Predictors and outcomes of engagement in an online depression prevention program for final year secondary school students

Hayley M. Jackson , Louise M. Farrer , Aliza Werner-Seidler , Yael Perry , Helen Christensen , Jeneva L. Ohan , Alison L. Calear , Philip J. Batterham
{"title":"Predictors and outcomes of engagement in an online depression prevention program for final year secondary school students","authors":"Hayley M. Jackson ,&nbsp;Louise M. Farrer ,&nbsp;Aliza Werner-Seidler ,&nbsp;Yael Perry ,&nbsp;Helen Christensen ,&nbsp;Jeneva L. Ohan ,&nbsp;Alison L. Calear ,&nbsp;Philip J. Batterham","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although school-based delivery of online interventions can effectively prevent depression and other common mental disorders, little is known about the characteristics of students who engage with these programs. This study aimed to identify predictors of two indicators of adolescent engagement (program usage and skill enactment) with a school-based online depression prevention program. The study also explored the association between skill enactment and mental health outcomes. Participants were 204 final-year secondary school students (<em>M</em> = 16.7 years, <em>SD</em> = 0.51 years; 111 females) from the intervention condition of a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in 10 selective and partially selective government schools in Australia between 2015 and 2016. Program usage was measured as number of modules completed and skill enactment was assessed using a self-report questionnaire at post-intervention to determine the frequency of implementing program strategies (e.g., cognitive restructuring, activity scheduling). Predictors of engagement included demographics, mental health-related variables, and psychological factors (e.g., mastery). Regressions indicated that possible history of depression predicted fewer modules completed, whereas higher baseline anxiety, mastery, and higher perceived level of learning from the program predicted greater skill enactment. Mixed models did not show a significant effect of skill enactment on symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety, social phobia, or personal stigma. Future work is needed to investigate whether the results apply to students enrolled in non-selective programs and examine the effects of skill enactment and other possible mechanisms on outcomes in order to guide the refinement of future interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100027"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004423000275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although school-based delivery of online interventions can effectively prevent depression and other common mental disorders, little is known about the characteristics of students who engage with these programs. This study aimed to identify predictors of two indicators of adolescent engagement (program usage and skill enactment) with a school-based online depression prevention program. The study also explored the association between skill enactment and mental health outcomes. Participants were 204 final-year secondary school students (M = 16.7 years, SD = 0.51 years; 111 females) from the intervention condition of a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in 10 selective and partially selective government schools in Australia between 2015 and 2016. Program usage was measured as number of modules completed and skill enactment was assessed using a self-report questionnaire at post-intervention to determine the frequency of implementing program strategies (e.g., cognitive restructuring, activity scheduling). Predictors of engagement included demographics, mental health-related variables, and psychological factors (e.g., mastery). Regressions indicated that possible history of depression predicted fewer modules completed, whereas higher baseline anxiety, mastery, and higher perceived level of learning from the program predicted greater skill enactment. Mixed models did not show a significant effect of skill enactment on symptoms of depression, generalized anxiety, social phobia, or personal stigma. Future work is needed to investigate whether the results apply to students enrolled in non-selective programs and examine the effects of skill enactment and other possible mechanisms on outcomes in order to guide the refinement of future interventions.

中学生参与在线抑郁症预防计划的预测因素和结果
尽管以学校为基础的在线干预可以有效预防抑郁症和其他常见的精神障碍,但人们对参与这些项目的学生的特点知之甚少。本研究旨在确定青少年参与学校在线抑郁症预防计划的两个指标(计划使用和技能制定)的预测因素。该研究还探讨了技能设定与心理健康结果之间的关系。2015年至2016年间,在澳大利亚10所选择性和部分选择性公立学校进行的一项集群随机对照试验的干预条件下,参与者为204名最后一年的中学生(M=16.7岁,SD=0.51岁;111名女性)。项目使用情况以完成的模块数量衡量,并在干预后使用自我报告问卷评估技能制定,以确定实施项目策略的频率(如认知结构调整、活动安排)。参与度的预测因素包括人口统计学、心理健康相关变量和心理因素(如掌握程度)。回归表明,可能的抑郁症病史预示着完成的模块更少,而更高的基线焦虑、掌握程度和更高的项目学习感知水平预示着更大的技能制定。混合模型没有显示技能设定对抑郁、普遍焦虑、社交恐惧症或个人污名症状的显著影响。未来的工作需要调查这些结果是否适用于非选择性项目的学生,并检查技能制定和其他可能的机制对结果的影响,以指导未来干预措施的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信