Henrique Rasera Raniro , Francielli Oliveira , João Otávio Araujo , Pedro Jacob Christoffoleti
{"title":"Broadcast nitrogen application can negatively affect maize leaf area index and grain yield components under weed competition","authors":"Henrique Rasera Raniro , Francielli Oliveira , João Otávio Araujo , Pedro Jacob Christoffoleti","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nitrogen (N) application and weed control play critical roles in the development of crops. In maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) cultivation, surface broadcast N application aiming at higher productivities is a common practice. However, N addition under weed competition could promote weeds rather than maize. To investigate this, a field study was developed over a Brazilian eutric nitisol for summer maize. We manipulated the presence (+) or absence (−) of surface broadcast N fertilization (N<sub>S</sub>) at the recommended dose (90 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> N) and weed control (W<sub>C</sub>), obtaining the treatments N<sub>S</sub>+W<sub>C</sub>+, N<sub>S</sub>+W<sub>C</sub>−, N<sub>S</sub>−W<sub>C</sub>+, N<sub>S</sub>−W<sub>C</sub>−. We aimed to determine 1) whether maize could profit from N application even under weed competition, and 2) how treatments would affect maize's leaf area index and all grain yield components (cobs area<sup>−1</sup>, rows cob<sup>−1</sup>, grains row<sup>−1</sup> and individual grain weight). We hypothesized that broadcast N application could jeopardize maize productivity by favoring weed development. Under no weed control, N application increased weed biomass by ∼58%, which resulted in reductions of 57% in leaf area index, 6.9% in rows per cob, 48% in grains per row, and 18.7% in grain weight. Ultimately, the grain yield (8216 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) of the best performing treatment (N<sub>S</sub>+W<sub>C</sub>+) was 66% higher than that with the worst performance (N<sub>S</sub>+W<sub>C</sub>−), of 2797.3 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>. We conclude that in fertilized areas, weed control should be a priority, since the N applied under weed competition could be detrimental to maize's leaf area index, and affect most yield components and overall productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) application and weed control play critical roles in the development of crops. In maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation, surface broadcast N application aiming at higher productivities is a common practice. However, N addition under weed competition could promote weeds rather than maize. To investigate this, a field study was developed over a Brazilian eutric nitisol for summer maize. We manipulated the presence (+) or absence (−) of surface broadcast N fertilization (NS) at the recommended dose (90 kg ha−1 N) and weed control (WC), obtaining the treatments NS+WC+, NS+WC−, NS−WC+, NS−WC−. We aimed to determine 1) whether maize could profit from N application even under weed competition, and 2) how treatments would affect maize's leaf area index and all grain yield components (cobs area−1, rows cob−1, grains row−1 and individual grain weight). We hypothesized that broadcast N application could jeopardize maize productivity by favoring weed development. Under no weed control, N application increased weed biomass by ∼58%, which resulted in reductions of 57% in leaf area index, 6.9% in rows per cob, 48% in grains per row, and 18.7% in grain weight. Ultimately, the grain yield (8216 kg ha−1) of the best performing treatment (NS+WC+) was 66% higher than that with the worst performance (NS+WC−), of 2797.3 kg ha−1. We conclude that in fertilized areas, weed control should be a priority, since the N applied under weed competition could be detrimental to maize's leaf area index, and affect most yield components and overall productivity.