Broadcast nitrogen application can negatively affect maize leaf area index and grain yield components under weed competition

Henrique Rasera Raniro , Francielli Oliveira , João Otávio Araujo , Pedro Jacob Christoffoleti
{"title":"Broadcast nitrogen application can negatively affect maize leaf area index and grain yield components under weed competition","authors":"Henrique Rasera Raniro ,&nbsp;Francielli Oliveira ,&nbsp;João Otávio Araujo ,&nbsp;Pedro Jacob Christoffoleti","doi":"10.1016/j.farsys.2023.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nitrogen (N) application and weed control play critical roles in the development of crops. In maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) cultivation, surface broadcast N application aiming at higher productivities is a common practice. However, N addition under weed competition could promote weeds rather than maize. To investigate this, a field study was developed over a Brazilian eutric nitisol for summer maize. We manipulated the presence (+) or absence (−) of surface broadcast N fertilization (N<sub>S</sub>) at the recommended dose (90 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup> N) and weed control (W<sub>C</sub>), obtaining the treatments N<sub>S</sub>+W<sub>C</sub>+, N<sub>S</sub>+W<sub>C</sub>−, N<sub>S</sub>−W<sub>C</sub>+, N<sub>S</sub>−W<sub>C</sub>−. We aimed to determine 1) whether maize could profit from N application even under weed competition, and 2) how treatments would affect maize's leaf area index and all grain yield components (cobs area<sup>−1</sup>, rows cob<sup>−1</sup>, grains row<sup>−1</sup> and individual grain weight). We hypothesized that broadcast N application could jeopardize maize productivity by favoring weed development. Under no weed control, N application increased weed biomass by ∼58%, which resulted in reductions of 57% in leaf area index, 6.9% in rows per cob, 48% in grains per row, and 18.7% in grain weight. Ultimately, the grain yield (8216 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup>) of the best performing treatment (N<sub>S</sub>+W<sub>C</sub>+) was 66% higher than that with the worst performance (N<sub>S</sub>+W<sub>C</sub>−), of 2797.3 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup>. We conclude that in fertilized areas, weed control should be a priority, since the N applied under weed competition could be detrimental to maize's leaf area index, and affect most yield components and overall productivity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100522,"journal":{"name":"Farming System","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farming System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949911923000497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) application and weed control play critical roles in the development of crops. In maize (Zea mays L.) cultivation, surface broadcast N application aiming at higher productivities is a common practice. However, N addition under weed competition could promote weeds rather than maize. To investigate this, a field study was developed over a Brazilian eutric nitisol for summer maize. We manipulated the presence (+) or absence (−) of surface broadcast N fertilization (NS) at the recommended dose (90 ​kg ​ha−1 N) and weed control (WC), obtaining the treatments NS+WC+, NS+WC−, NS−WC+, NS−WC−. We aimed to determine 1) whether maize could profit from N application even under weed competition, and 2) how treatments would affect maize's leaf area index and all grain yield components (cobs area−1, rows cob−1, grains row−1 and individual grain weight). We hypothesized that broadcast N application could jeopardize maize productivity by favoring weed development. Under no weed control, N application increased weed biomass by ∼58%, which resulted in reductions of 57% in leaf area index, 6.9% in rows per cob, 48% in grains per row, and 18.7% in grain weight. Ultimately, the grain yield (8216 ​kg ​ha−1) of the best performing treatment (NS+WC+) was 66% higher than that with the worst performance (NS+WC−), of 2797.3 ​kg ​ha−1. We conclude that in fertilized areas, weed control should be a priority, since the N applied under weed competition could be detrimental to maize's leaf area index, and affect most yield components and overall productivity.

Abstract Image

在杂草竞争条件下,施氮对玉米叶面积指数和籽粒产量构成因素产生负面影响
氮的施用和杂草的控制在作物的发育中起着至关重要的作用。在玉米(Zea mays L.)栽培中,旨在提高生产力的地表施氮是一种常见的做法。然而,在杂草竞争下添加N可以促进杂草而不是玉米。为了对此进行研究,对巴西的一种用于夏玉米的富镍钛溶胶进行了实地研究。我们在推荐剂量(90​kg​ha−1 N)和杂草控制(WC),获得处理NS+WC+、NS+WC-、NS−WC+、NS−WC−。我们的目的是确定1)即使在杂草竞争的情况下,玉米是否可以从施氮中获利,以及2)处理如何影响玉米的叶面积指数和所有谷物产量组成部分(玉米芯面积−1、行玉米芯−1、粒行−1和单粒重)。我们假设,施用氮肥有利于杂草的生长,从而危害玉米的生产力。在无杂草控制下,施氮使杂草生物量增加了~58%,导致叶面积指数下降57%,每穗行数下降6.9%,每行粒数下降48%,粒重下降18.7%。最终,粮食产量(8216​kg​ha−1)比表现最差的处理(NS+WC−)高66%,为2797.3​kg​ha−1。我们得出的结论是,在施肥区,杂草控制应该是优先事项,因为在杂草竞争下施用的N可能不利于玉米的叶面积指数,并影响大多数产量组成部分和整体生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信