Remarks on solidarity in bankruptcy problems when agents merge or split

IF 0.5 4区经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS

Mathematical Social Sciences Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2023.07.004

Pedro Calleja , Francesc Llerena , Peter Sudhölter

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this note, we investigate the relationship between non-manipulability via merging (splitting) and strong non-manipulability via merging (splitting). Our analysis reveals that while these two non-manipulability axioms are generally not equivalent, they do coincide when the principle of solidarity is satisfied. This principle is fulfilled by a wide range of bankruptcy rules, including parametric rules.

查看原文本刊更多论文

论代理人合并或分立时破产问题的团结

在这篇文章中，我们研究了通过合并（分裂）的不可操作性和通过合并（分割）的强不可操纵性之间的关系。我们的分析表明，虽然这两个不可操作性公理通常不等价，但当团结原则得到满足时，它们确实一致。这一原则通过一系列破产规则来实现，包括参数规则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Mathematical Social Sciences 数学-数学跨学科应用

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

59 days

期刊介绍： The international, interdisciplinary journal Mathematical Social Sciences publishes original research articles, survey papers, short notes and book reviews. The journal emphasizes the unity of mathematical modelling in economics, psychology, political sciences, sociology and other social sciences. Topics of particular interest include the fundamental aspects of choice, information, and preferences (decision science) and of interaction (game theory and economic theory), the measurement of utility, welfare and inequality, the formal theories of justice and implementation, voting rules, cooperative games, fair division, cost allocation, bargaining, matching, social networks, and evolutionary and other dynamics models. Papers published by the journal are mathematically rigorous but no bounds, from above or from below, limits their technical level. All mathematical techniques may be used. The articles should be self-contained and readable by social scientists trained in mathematics.