Tell Me More: A content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom

IF 3.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Kecia Williams Smith
{"title":"Tell Me More: A content analysis of expanded auditor reporting in the United Kingdom","authors":"Kecia Williams Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.aos.2023.101456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Examining the implementation of ISA 700 (UK and Ireland) provides unique insights into auditors’ word choice and tone when creating expanded audit reports. Focusing on the first two years of ISA 700 implementation, I evaluate readability and tone to determine if ISA 700 audit reports are associated with greater reading ease and increased risk discussion. I find that ISA 700 audit reports are easier to read and better reflect the risk-related nature of the audit. Results show that improvements are concentrated in the initial year of implementation. Additionally, audit reports include more general versus discipline-specific terms noted in management-developed communications. Using an information readability metric, I find that post-ISA 700 audit reports are readable even when more risks are disclosed. Overall, these results show that expanded audit reports can be crafted in a manner that is easier to understand while communicating the underlying risks in a financial statement audit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48379,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Organizations and Society","volume":"108 ","pages":"Article 101456"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Organizations and Society","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361368223000272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Examining the implementation of ISA 700 (UK and Ireland) provides unique insights into auditors’ word choice and tone when creating expanded audit reports. Focusing on the first two years of ISA 700 implementation, I evaluate readability and tone to determine if ISA 700 audit reports are associated with greater reading ease and increased risk discussion. I find that ISA 700 audit reports are easier to read and better reflect the risk-related nature of the audit. Results show that improvements are concentrated in the initial year of implementation. Additionally, audit reports include more general versus discipline-specific terms noted in management-developed communications. Using an information readability metric, I find that post-ISA 700 audit reports are readable even when more risks are disclosed. Overall, these results show that expanded audit reports can be crafted in a manner that is easier to understand while communicating the underlying risks in a financial statement audit.

告诉我更多:英国扩大审计师报告的内容分析
检查ISA 700(英国和爱尔兰)的实施情况,可以对审计师在创建扩展审计报告时的措辞和语气提供独特的见解。重点关注ISA 700实施的前两年,我评估了ISA 700审计报告的可读性和基调,以确定ISA 700审计报表是否与更易于阅读和增加风险讨论有关。我发现ISA 700审计报告更容易阅读,更好地反映了审计的风险相关性质。结果表明,改进集中在执行的最初一年。此外,审计报告包括管理层制定的沟通中提到的更一般而非特定学科的术语。使用信息可读性度量,我发现即使披露了更多风险,ISA 700后的审计报告也是可读的。总的来说,这些结果表明,在传达财务报表审计中的潜在风险时,可以以更容易理解的方式编制扩展审计报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Accounting, Organizations & Society is a major international journal concerned with all aspects of the relationship between accounting and human behaviour, organizational structures and processes, and the changing social and political environment of the enterprise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信