Predictors and moderators of treatment response in cognitive behavioural therapy for body dysmorphic disorder: A systematic review

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Hogg , P. Adamopoulos , G. Krebs
{"title":"Predictors and moderators of treatment response in cognitive behavioural therapy for body dysmorphic disorder: A systematic review","authors":"E. Hogg ,&nbsp;P. Adamopoulos ,&nbsp;G. Krebs","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span><span>Although Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is an effective </span>treatment for </span>Body Dysmorphic Disorder<span> (BDD), substantial variability exists in patient responses. The aim of this </span></span>systematic review was to synthesise the emerging literature on predictors and moderators of treatment response in CBT for BDD. EMBASE, MEDLINE®, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched for studies reporting predictor and/or moderator analyses in samples of individuals with diagnosed BDD who received CBT specifically for this disorder. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS). The search identified eleven studies, examining 56 predictor variables. Nine variables (e.g. insight, depression, BDD severity) emerged as significant predictors in some but not all studies. No variables were found to </span><em>consistently</em> predict outcome at post-treatment or follow-up. Only one study reported moderator analyses and found no significant effects. In summary, although certain variables, such as insight, depression, and BDD severity, may predict response to CBT for BDD, findings have been inconsistent and common methodological flaws (e.g. inadequate statistical power) reduce the strength of evidence. Further, methodologically-robust research is needed to identify predictors and moderators of responses to CBT for BDD, in order to inform optimisation of CBT and support clinical decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221136492300043X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), substantial variability exists in patient responses. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the emerging literature on predictors and moderators of treatment response in CBT for BDD. EMBASE, MEDLINE®, and PsycINFO databases were systematically searched for studies reporting predictor and/or moderator analyses in samples of individuals with diagnosed BDD who received CBT specifically for this disorder. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS). The search identified eleven studies, examining 56 predictor variables. Nine variables (e.g. insight, depression, BDD severity) emerged as significant predictors in some but not all studies. No variables were found to consistently predict outcome at post-treatment or follow-up. Only one study reported moderator analyses and found no significant effects. In summary, although certain variables, such as insight, depression, and BDD severity, may predict response to CBT for BDD, findings have been inconsistent and common methodological flaws (e.g. inadequate statistical power) reduce the strength of evidence. Further, methodologically-robust research is needed to identify predictors and moderators of responses to CBT for BDD, in order to inform optimisation of CBT and support clinical decision-making.

身体变形障碍认知行为疗法治疗反应的预测因素和调节因素:一项系统综述
尽管认知行为疗法(CBT)是治疗身体变形障碍(BDD)的有效方法,但患者的反应存在很大差异。本系统综述的目的是综合关于BDD CBT治疗反应的预测因素和调节因素的新兴文献。系统地搜索EMBASE、MEDLINE®和PsycINFO数据库,以寻找报告对诊断为BDD的个体样本进行预测和/或调节分析的研究,这些个体接受了专门针对该疾病的CBT。纳入研究的方法学质量使用非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)进行评估。搜索确定了11项研究,检查了56个预测变量。在一些但并非所有的研究中,九个变量(如洞察力、抑郁、BDD严重程度)成为重要的预测因素。没有发现任何变量能够一致预测治疗后或随访的结果。只有一项研究报告了调节因子分析,没有发现显著影响。总之,尽管某些变量,如洞察力、抑郁和BDD严重程度,可以预测BDD对CBT的反应,但研究结果并不一致,常见的方法缺陷(如统计能力不足)降低了证据的强度。此外,需要进行方法学上稳健的研究,以确定BDD对CBT反应的预测因素和调节因素,从而为CBT的优化提供信息并支持临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信