Assessing the validity of self-report social media use: Evidence of No relationship with objective smartphone use

IF 12.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Computers in Human Behavior Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-17 DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107567
Tamsin Mahalingham , Peter M. McEvoy , Patrick J.F. Clarke
{"title":"Assessing the validity of self-report social media use: Evidence of No relationship with objective smartphone use","authors":"Tamsin Mahalingham ,&nbsp;Peter M. McEvoy ,&nbsp;Patrick J.F. Clarke","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2022.107567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social media use research remains dominated by self-report measures, despite concerns they may not accurately reflect objective social media use. The association between commonly employed self-report measures and objective social media use remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of association between an objective and commonly employed subjective measures of social media use. The study specifically examined a single-estimate self-report measure, a problematic social media use scale, and objective use derived from smartphone data, in a sample of 209 individuals. The findings showed a very weak non-significant relationship between the objective measure and the single-estimate measure, (r = −.04, <em>p</em> = .58, BF<sub>10</sub> = 0.18), and a weak significant relationship between the objective measure and the problematic social media use scale (r = .19, <em>p</em> = .01, BF<sub>10</sub> = 3.04). These findings converge with other recent research to suggest there is very little shared variance between subjective estimates of social media use and objective use. This highlights the possibility that subjective social media use may be largely unrelated to objective use, which has implications for ensuring the rigor of future research and raising potential concerns regarding the veracity of previous research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":"140 ","pages":"Article 107567"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563222003879","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Social media use research remains dominated by self-report measures, despite concerns they may not accurately reflect objective social media use. The association between commonly employed self-report measures and objective social media use remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the degree of association between an objective and commonly employed subjective measures of social media use. The study specifically examined a single-estimate self-report measure, a problematic social media use scale, and objective use derived from smartphone data, in a sample of 209 individuals. The findings showed a very weak non-significant relationship between the objective measure and the single-estimate measure, (r = −.04, p = .58, BF10 = 0.18), and a weak significant relationship between the objective measure and the problematic social media use scale (r = .19, p = .01, BF10 = 3.04). These findings converge with other recent research to suggest there is very little shared variance between subjective estimates of social media use and objective use. This highlights the possibility that subjective social media use may be largely unrelated to objective use, which has implications for ensuring the rigor of future research and raising potential concerns regarding the veracity of previous research.

评估自我报告社交媒体使用的有效性:与客观智能手机使用无关的证据
社交媒体使用研究仍然以自我报告措施为主,尽管人们担心这些措施可能无法准确反映客观的社交媒体使用情况。常用的自我报告措施与客观的社交媒体使用之间的联系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定社交媒体使用的客观和常用主观衡量标准之间的关联程度。这项研究特别检查了209名样本中的单一估计自我报告量表、有问题的社交媒体使用量表和来自智能手机数据的客观使用情况。研究结果显示,客观测量和单一估计测量之间存在非常微弱的非显著关系,(r=−.04,p=.58,BF10=0.18),客观测量与有问题的社交媒体使用量表之间存在微弱的显著关系(r=.19,p=.01,BF10=3.04)。这些发现与最近的其他研究一致,表明社交媒体使用的主观估计与客观使用之间几乎没有共同的差异。这突出了主观社交媒体使用可能在很大程度上与客观使用无关的可能性,这对确保未来研究的严谨性和引发对先前研究真实性的潜在担忧具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
381
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书