Meta-analysis of movement-based interventions to aid academic and behavioral outcomes: A taxonomy of relevance and integration

IF 9.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Myrto F. Mavilidi , Caterina Pesce , Valentin Benzing , Mirko Schmidt , Fred Paas , Anthony D. Okely , Spyridoula Vazou
{"title":"Meta-analysis of movement-based interventions to aid academic and behavioral outcomes: A taxonomy of relevance and integration","authors":"Myrto F. Mavilidi ,&nbsp;Caterina Pesce ,&nbsp;Valentin Benzing ,&nbsp;Mirko Schmidt ,&nbsp;Fred Paas ,&nbsp;Anthony D. Okely ,&nbsp;Spyridoula Vazou","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of movement strategies during academic time, on children's and adolescents' cognitive processing, memory, behavioral control, and academic skills. We used a 2 </span><span><math><mrow><mo>×</mo></mrow></math></span><span><span> 2 design to categorize studies, based on their level of integration with (low vs. high) and relevance to the learning content (low vs high). Meta-analyses were conducted per overarching outcome constructs. Age was explored as a potential moderator. A total of 83 studies involving 25,641 participants were included. The high integration-high relevance movement strategy applied in longer-term (i.e., chronic) physical activity interventions had positive effects with the largest effect (ES = 0.94) on memory. The low integration-low relevance movement strategy had large effects on behavioral control measures for longer-term physical activity (ES = 1.42) and single (i.e., acute) bouts of physical activity; ES = 1.15). A nuanced pattern of results emerged in the other categories (high-low and low-high). A theory-based mapping of studies was used to disentangle the effects of different types of movement strategies during academic time on selective outcomes. Consistencies were identified and explained referring to </span>theories grounded<span> in educational psychology and exercise and cognition research.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X22000471","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of movement strategies during academic time, on children's and adolescents' cognitive processing, memory, behavioral control, and academic skills. We used a 2 × 2 design to categorize studies, based on their level of integration with (low vs. high) and relevance to the learning content (low vs high). Meta-analyses were conducted per overarching outcome constructs. Age was explored as a potential moderator. A total of 83 studies involving 25,641 participants were included. The high integration-high relevance movement strategy applied in longer-term (i.e., chronic) physical activity interventions had positive effects with the largest effect (ES = 0.94) on memory. The low integration-low relevance movement strategy had large effects on behavioral control measures for longer-term physical activity (ES = 1.42) and single (i.e., acute) bouts of physical activity; ES = 1.15). A nuanced pattern of results emerged in the other categories (high-low and low-high). A theory-based mapping of studies was used to disentangle the effects of different types of movement strategies during academic time on selective outcomes. Consistencies were identified and explained referring to theories grounded in educational psychology and exercise and cognition research.

以运动为基础的干预以帮助学术和行为结果的荟萃分析:相关性和整合的分类
本荟萃分析的目的是评估学习期间运动策略对儿童和青少年认知加工、记忆、行为控制和学习技能的影响。我们使用2 × 2设计对研究进行分类,基于它们与学习内容的整合水平(低与高)和相关性(低与高)。根据总体结果结构进行meta分析。年龄是一个潜在的调节因素。共纳入83项研究,涉及25,641名参与者。在长期(即慢性)体育活动干预中应用高整合-高相关性运动策略对记忆有积极影响,其中对记忆的影响最大(ES = 0.94)。低整合-低相关运动策略对长期体育活动(ES = 1.42)和单次(即急性)体育活动的行为控制措施有较大影响;es = 1.15)。在其他类别(高-低和低-高)中出现了微妙的结果模式。一个基于理论的研究映射被用来解开在学习期间不同类型的运动策略对选择结果的影响。根据教育心理学和运动与认知研究的理论,对一致性进行了识别和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research Review
Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信