A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education

IF 9.6 1区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Educational Research Review Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489

Seyyed Kazem Banihashem , Omid Noroozi , Stan van Ginkel , Leah P. Macfadyen , Harm J.A. Biemans

{"title":"A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in enhancing feedback practices in higher education","authors":"Seyyed Kazem Banihashem , Omid Noroozi , Stan van Ginkel , Leah P. Macfadyen , Harm J.A. Biemans","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Learning analytics (LA) offers new opportunities to enrich feedback practices in higher education, but little is understood about the ways different LA can enhance feedback practices for educators and students. This systematic literature review maps the current state of implementation of LA to improve feedback practices in technology-mediated learning environments in higher education. We used strict inclusion criteria to select relevant studies that have investigated the role of LA on feedback practices. To identify common features of LA for feedback studies, we coded relevant publications using an analytical framework that identifies four key dimensions of LA systems: what (types of data), how (analytic methods), why (objectives), and how educators and students are served by LA (stakeholders). Based on findings, we propose a conceptual framework that can guide the implementation of LA for feedback systems and also suggest future empirical research in this area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X22000586/pdfft?md5=7b80988498f028ea0cad863106e9d88e&pid=1-s2.0-S1747938X22000586-main.pdf","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X22000586","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 27

Abstract

Learning analytics (LA) offers new opportunities to enrich feedback practices in higher education, but little is understood about the ways different LA can enhance feedback practices for educators and students. This systematic literature review maps the current state of implementation of LA to improve feedback practices in technology-mediated learning environments in higher education. We used strict inclusion criteria to select relevant studies that have investigated the role of LA on feedback practices. To identify common features of LA for feedback studies, we coded relevant publications using an analytical framework that identifies four key dimensions of LA systems: what (types of data), how (analytic methods), why (objectives), and how educators and students are served by LA (stakeholders). Based on findings, we propose a conceptual framework that can guide the implementation of LA for feedback systems and also suggest future empirical research in this area.

查看原文本刊更多论文

学习分析在加强高等教育反馈实践中的作用的系统回顾

学习分析(LA)为丰富高等教育中的反馈实践提供了新的机会，但人们对不同的LA如何增强教育工作者和学生的反馈实践知之甚少。这篇系统的文献综述描绘了在高等教育技术中介学习环境中改进反馈实践的LA实施现状。我们使用严格的纳入标准来选择调查了LA在反馈实践中的作用的相关研究。为了确定反馈研究的洛杉矶学习的共同特征，我们使用一个分析框架对相关出版物进行编码，该框架确定了洛杉矶学习系统的四个关键维度:什么(数据类型)、如何(分析方法)、为什么(目标)以及洛杉矶学习如何为教育者和学生服务(利益相关者)。基于这些发现，我们提出了一个概念框架，可以指导反馈系统的LA实施，并建议该领域未来的实证研究。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Educational Research Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

19.40

自引率

0.90%

发文量

审稿时长

57 days

期刊介绍： Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格