Evaluation of ecological buffer zone based on landscape pattern for non-point source pollution control: A case study in Hanjiang River basin, China

IF 5.9 1区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Weifeng Xie , Jiake Li , Yiwen Liu , Kai Peng , Ke Zhang
{"title":"Evaluation of ecological buffer zone based on landscape pattern for non-point source pollution control: A case study in Hanjiang River basin, China","authors":"Weifeng Xie ,&nbsp;Jiake Li ,&nbsp;Yiwen Liu ,&nbsp;Kai Peng ,&nbsp;Ke Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.130341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The deterioration of ecological environment caused by non-point source pollution (NPS) has seriously threatened human health and socioeconomic development. Effective identification of critical source areas and selecting appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for watersheds are the keys to controlling NPS. This paper, using Hanjiang River basin, the vital water source for the South-to-North Water Division, China, as a case study, presents a method for accurate critical source areas dentification according to the spatial distribution characteristics of underlying surface and pollution load by coupling NPS risk index (NPPRI), Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model, and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). In this research, ten single and three combined scenarios are set up in the critical source areas, including three non-engineering management practices, two engineering management practices, and five ecological buffer zones. Finally, the effect of BMPs for non-point source pollution is assessed by using landscape pattern theory and information entropy method. Furthermore, the influences of the five ecological buffer zones on the characteristics of landscape in watershed and the response relationship between the landscape pattern and NPS are analyzed. The following findings are obtained: (1) The critical source areas were mainly located in the south-central and southeastern part of the study area, accounting for 35.9 % of the total watershed area, and yielding 54.2 % and 60.7 % of the total nitrogen(TN) and total phosphorus(TP) loads in the watershed; (2) All ecological buffer zones play a positive role in NPS control with an average reduction rate of 32.1 % for TN and 46.7 % for TP, and the control effectiveness for TP are better than that for TN; (3) The deployment of the five ecological buffer zones have a significant impact on the interspersion juxtaposition index (IJI), the connectivity of the “sink” landscape is enhanced, the diversity of the “source” landscape is reduced and the “sink” landscape’s ability of interception is boosted; (4) The calculation result of information entropy shows the highest attribute value of practices in the ecological buffer zones is Buffer 200 m. Overall, the findings serve as a reference for NPS control and water environment management in the watershed and strengthen the feasibility of implementing of BMPs in the watershed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"626 ","pages":"Article 130341"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169423012830","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The deterioration of ecological environment caused by non-point source pollution (NPS) has seriously threatened human health and socioeconomic development. Effective identification of critical source areas and selecting appropriate best management practices (BMPs) for watersheds are the keys to controlling NPS. This paper, using Hanjiang River basin, the vital water source for the South-to-North Water Division, China, as a case study, presents a method for accurate critical source areas dentification according to the spatial distribution characteristics of underlying surface and pollution load by coupling NPS risk index (NPPRI), Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) Model, and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). In this research, ten single and three combined scenarios are set up in the critical source areas, including three non-engineering management practices, two engineering management practices, and five ecological buffer zones. Finally, the effect of BMPs for non-point source pollution is assessed by using landscape pattern theory and information entropy method. Furthermore, the influences of the five ecological buffer zones on the characteristics of landscape in watershed and the response relationship between the landscape pattern and NPS are analyzed. The following findings are obtained: (1) The critical source areas were mainly located in the south-central and southeastern part of the study area, accounting for 35.9 % of the total watershed area, and yielding 54.2 % and 60.7 % of the total nitrogen(TN) and total phosphorus(TP) loads in the watershed; (2) All ecological buffer zones play a positive role in NPS control with an average reduction rate of 32.1 % for TN and 46.7 % for TP, and the control effectiveness for TP are better than that for TN; (3) The deployment of the five ecological buffer zones have a significant impact on the interspersion juxtaposition index (IJI), the connectivity of the “sink” landscape is enhanced, the diversity of the “source” landscape is reduced and the “sink” landscape’s ability of interception is boosted; (4) The calculation result of information entropy shows the highest attribute value of practices in the ecological buffer zones is Buffer 200 m. Overall, the findings serve as a reference for NPS control and water environment management in the watershed and strengthen the feasibility of implementing of BMPs in the watershed.

基于景观格局的非点源污染控制生态缓冲区评价——以汉江流域为例
非点源污染引起的生态环境恶化已严重威胁到人类健康和社会经济发展。有效识别关键源区和选择适当的流域最佳管理实践是控制NPS的关键。以中国南水北调重要水源地汉江流域为例,提出了一种基于下垫面和污染负荷空间分布特征的NPS风险指数(NPPRI)、最小累积阻力(MCR)模型和水土评价工具(SWAT)耦合的临界水源地识别方法。本研究在关键源区设置了10个单一情景和3个组合情景,包括3个非工程管理实践、2个工程管理实践和5个生态缓冲区。最后,运用景观格局理论和信息熵法评价了生态系统对非点源污染的治理效果。此外,还分析了5个生态缓冲区对流域景观特征的影响,以及景观格局与NPS的响应关系。结果表明:(1)关键源区主要分布在研究区中南部和东南部,占流域总面积的35.9%,占流域总氮(TN)和总磷(TP)负荷的54.2%和60.7%;(2)各生态缓冲区对NPS均有积极的控制作用,TN和TP的平均减少率分别为32.1%和46.7%,TP的控制效果优于TN;(3) 5个生态缓冲区的布置对景观的穿插并置指数(IJI)有显著影响,“汇”景观的连通性增强,“源”景观的多样性降低,“汇”景观的截留能力增强;(4)信息熵计算结果表明,生态缓冲区内的实践活动属性值最高的是缓冲区200 m。研究结果可为流域NPS控制和水环境管理提供参考,增强流域实施bmp的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology
Journal of Hydrology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
1309
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信