Restorations of Class II Cavities Evaluated for Marginal Leakage When Restored with Composites or a Giomer Using Different Bonding Agents.

Natasha Gupta, Neelam Singh
{"title":"Restorations of Class II Cavities Evaluated for Marginal Leakage When Restored with Composites or a Giomer Using Different Bonding Agents.","authors":"Natasha Gupta, Neelam Singh","doi":"10.11607/prd.4866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the marginal leakage of three different types of bonding agents used with two posterior composites and a giomer, available commercially.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Class II box-only cavities were prepared on 90 mandibular first molars with margins extending 1 mm beyond the cementoenamel junction. The samples were divided into nine groups based on three different bonding agents, two different composites, and a giomer. Cavities were restored per the manufacturer's description. Teeth were subjected to a thermocycling procedure (500×, 5°C to 55°C) and dye penetration by immersing in a 2% methylene blue solution (Merck Specialties) for 24 hours. The marginal adaptation was evaluated as a continuous margin at the gingival level under a stereomicroscope. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the groups with the total-etch technique showed no statistical difference between the nanohybrid Filtek Z250 XT (3M ESPE) and fine hybrid SwissTEC composite (Coltène\\Whaledent AG). The groups with the self-etch technique showed no statistical difference when used with either of the two composites. The acid-etch technique showed better marginal adaptation than the self-etch technique. When the giomer (Beautifil II, Shofu) was used with the total-etch technique, it showed better adaptation than when used with the self-etch technique but overall showed more marginal leakage than the composites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total-etch technique provided better marginal adaptation for the composites and giomer compared to the self-etch technique.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The demand for esthetic restorations continues to increase, and composite restorations are now considered the material of choice for Class II cavities. There are various concerns with composite restorations, one of them being good marginal adaptation to increase the life of the restoration. This study evaluated marginal leakage with the nanohybrid composite Filtek Z250 XT, fine hybrid composite SwissTEC, and a giomer when used with the total-etch technique and self-etch technique and reported satisfactory adaptation with the total-etch technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":94231,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the marginal leakage of three different types of bonding agents used with two posterior composites and a giomer, available commercially.

Material and methods: Class II box-only cavities were prepared on 90 mandibular first molars with margins extending 1 mm beyond the cementoenamel junction. The samples were divided into nine groups based on three different bonding agents, two different composites, and a giomer. Cavities were restored per the manufacturer's description. Teeth were subjected to a thermocycling procedure (500×, 5°C to 55°C) and dye penetration by immersing in a 2% methylene blue solution (Merck Specialties) for 24 hours. The marginal adaptation was evaluated as a continuous margin at the gingival level under a stereomicroscope. The results were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: The results of the groups with the total-etch technique showed no statistical difference between the nanohybrid Filtek Z250 XT (3M ESPE) and fine hybrid SwissTEC composite (Coltène\Whaledent AG). The groups with the self-etch technique showed no statistical difference when used with either of the two composites. The acid-etch technique showed better marginal adaptation than the self-etch technique. When the giomer (Beautifil II, Shofu) was used with the total-etch technique, it showed better adaptation than when used with the self-etch technique but overall showed more marginal leakage than the composites.

Conclusion: The total-etch technique provided better marginal adaptation for the composites and giomer compared to the self-etch technique.

Clinical significance: The demand for esthetic restorations continues to increase, and composite restorations are now considered the material of choice for Class II cavities. There are various concerns with composite restorations, one of them being good marginal adaptation to increase the life of the restoration. This study evaluated marginal leakage with the nanohybrid composite Filtek Z250 XT, fine hybrid composite SwissTEC, and a giomer when used with the total-etch technique and self-etch technique and reported satisfactory adaptation with the total-etch technique.

用复合材料或Giomer使用不同粘合剂修复时,评估边缘泄漏的II类空腔修复。
目的:评估三种不同类型的粘合剂与两种后部复合材料和一种市售giomer一起使用的边际渗漏。材料和方法:在90颗下颌第一磨牙上制备II类纯盒型牙洞,其边缘延伸超过牙骨质-釉连接处1mm。基于三种不同的结合剂、两种不同的复合材料和一种焦聚物,将样品分为九组。根据制造商的说明修复了气穴。牙齿接受热循环程序(500×,5°C至55°C),并通过浸入2%亚甲蓝溶液(Merck Specialties)中24小时进行染料渗透。在立体显微镜下,边缘适应被评估为牙龈水平的连续边缘。使用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U检验对结果进行分析。结果:采用全蚀刻技术的组的结果显示,纳米杂化Filtek Z250 XT(3M ESPE)和精细杂化SwissTEC复合材料(Coltène\Whaledent AG)之间没有统计学差异。当与两种复合材料中的任何一种一起使用时,采用自蚀刻技术的组没有显示出统计学差异。酸性蚀刻技术显示出比自蚀刻技术更好的边缘适应性。当giomer(Beautifil II,Shofu)与全蚀刻技术一起使用时,它显示出比与自蚀刻技术一起时更好的适应性,但总体上显示出比复合材料更多的边际泄漏。结论:与自蚀刻技术相比,全蚀刻技术为复合材料和焦默提供了更好的边缘适应性。临床意义:对美观修复体的需求持续增加,复合修复体现在被认为是II类蛀牙的首选材料。复合修复体有各种各样的问题,其中之一是良好的边缘适应,以增加修复体的寿命。本研究评估了纳米混合复合材料Filtek Z250 XT、精细混合复合材料SwissTEC和giomer在与全蚀刻技术和自蚀刻技术一起使用时的边际泄漏,并报告了与全蚀刻方法的令人满意的适应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信