Evaluating ethnically diverse patients' perspectives of considering participation in renal clinical research.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-12-07 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI:10.7748/nr.2023.e1904
Joy Oghogho Agbonmwandolor, Sarah Brand
{"title":"Evaluating ethnically diverse patients' perspectives of considering participation in renal clinical research.","authors":"Joy Oghogho Agbonmwandolor, Sarah Brand","doi":"10.7748/nr.2023.e1904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trial cohorts do not often reflect target patient populations because minority ethnic groups are underrepresented in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To increase minority ethnic groups' opportunities to participate in clinical trials, by evaluating ethnically diverse patients' perspectives of considering participation in renal clinical research.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The authors gave patients participating in at least one research study the opportunity to take part in a structured survey. The survey explored preferences, barriers and opportunities that patients considered when deciding whether to take part in a clinical trial. The authors included participants from multiple ethnic groups so they could compare data for different ethnicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participation was a positive experience for most patients, mostly because of the research team's flexibility and professionalism. Researchers' gender and ethnicity did not affect the participants' decision to participate. Cultural preferences were not obvious from the data as 80% of the participants were white.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Patients preferred a face-to-face approach and the expertise of the research team affected participation more than any other characteristics did. However, respondents were already research-engaged and conducting a similar study with those who have declined to participate in research may show different results.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2023.e1904","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trial cohorts do not often reflect target patient populations because minority ethnic groups are underrepresented in clinical trials.

Aim: To increase minority ethnic groups' opportunities to participate in clinical trials, by evaluating ethnically diverse patients' perspectives of considering participation in renal clinical research.

Discussion: The authors gave patients participating in at least one research study the opportunity to take part in a structured survey. The survey explored preferences, barriers and opportunities that patients considered when deciding whether to take part in a clinical trial. The authors included participants from multiple ethnic groups so they could compare data for different ethnicities.

Conclusion: Participation was a positive experience for most patients, mostly because of the research team's flexibility and professionalism. Researchers' gender and ethnicity did not affect the participants' decision to participate. Cultural preferences were not obvious from the data as 80% of the participants were white.

Implications for practice: Patients preferred a face-to-face approach and the expertise of the research team affected participation more than any other characteristics did. However, respondents were already research-engaged and conducting a similar study with those who have declined to participate in research may show different results.

评估不同种族患者考虑参与肾脏临床研究的观点。
背景:临床试验队列通常不能反映目标患者群体,因为少数民族在临床试验中的代表性不足。目的:通过评估不同种族患者对参与肾脏临床研究的看法,增加少数民族参与临床试验的机会。讨论:作者让至少参与一项研究的患者有机会参加结构化调查。该调查探讨了患者在决定是否参加临床试验时所考虑的偏好、障碍和机会。作者包括了来自多个种族群体的参与者,以便他们可以比较不同种族的数据。结论:参与对大多数患者来说是一种积极的体验,主要是因为研究团队的灵活性和专业性。研究人员的性别和种族并没有影响参与者的参与决定。数据显示,文化偏好并不明显,因为80%的参与者是白人。对实践的影响:患者更喜欢面对面的方法,研究团队的专业知识对参与的影响比任何其他特征都大。然而,受访者已经参与了研究,与那些拒绝参与研究的人进行类似的研究可能会显示出不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信