Misleading images of ductal carcinoma in situ: 4 lymph nodes with metastasis

Q4 Medicine
Emilio I. Abecia Martínez , Andrea Carilla Sanromán , Liliana Leon , Lucas Sanz Monge , Beatriz Eizaguirre Zarza
{"title":"Misleading images of ductal carcinoma in situ: 4 lymph nodes with metastasis","authors":"Emilio I. Abecia Martínez ,&nbsp;Andrea Carilla Sanromán ,&nbsp;Liliana Leon ,&nbsp;Lucas Sanz Monge ,&nbsp;Beatriz Eizaguirre Zarza","doi":"10.1016/j.patol.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since sentinel lymph node examination became routine, findings of benign ectopic breast tissue in lymph nodes have increased. We report images of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in four lymph nodes in a 76-year-old woman with bilateral breast carcinoma. The right lumpectomy showed intermixed invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma, plus DCIS. 19 nodes were isolated in the axillary lymphadenectomy, 4 of which displayed solid and cribriform DCIS. Myosin and p63 immunohistochemical techniques were positive, suggesting an erroneous diagnosis of “metastatic DCIS”. A further three cases of DCIS in lymph nodes have been previously reported, all with a distinct layer of myoepithelial cells with actin, myosin or p63. Biologically, these images of DCIS in lymph nodes are not credible and three major hypotheses have been proposed to explain these findings: <em>Iatrogenic Mechanical Transport</em>, <em>Revertant DCIS</em>, and <em>primary DCIS of lymph nodes</em>. We consider the first one the most plausible explanation. Our case is unique as several, rare findings are simultaneously observed. More new cases, together with additional immunohistochemical techniques and molecular testing on previous cases, are needed to find a definitive explanation of this histologic finding.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39194,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola de Patologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola de Patologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699885523000508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since sentinel lymph node examination became routine, findings of benign ectopic breast tissue in lymph nodes have increased. We report images of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in four lymph nodes in a 76-year-old woman with bilateral breast carcinoma. The right lumpectomy showed intermixed invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma, plus DCIS. 19 nodes were isolated in the axillary lymphadenectomy, 4 of which displayed solid and cribriform DCIS. Myosin and p63 immunohistochemical techniques were positive, suggesting an erroneous diagnosis of “metastatic DCIS”. A further three cases of DCIS in lymph nodes have been previously reported, all with a distinct layer of myoepithelial cells with actin, myosin or p63. Biologically, these images of DCIS in lymph nodes are not credible and three major hypotheses have been proposed to explain these findings: Iatrogenic Mechanical Transport, Revertant DCIS, and primary DCIS of lymph nodes. We consider the first one the most plausible explanation. Our case is unique as several, rare findings are simultaneously observed. More new cases, together with additional immunohistochemical techniques and molecular testing on previous cases, are needed to find a definitive explanation of this histologic finding.

导管原位癌的错误图像:4个淋巴结转移。
自从前哨淋巴结检查成为常规检查以来,淋巴结中良性异位乳腺组织的发现增加了。我们报告了一位76岁的双侧乳腺癌妇女的四个淋巴结中的导管原位癌(DCIS)图像。右侧肿块切除术显示混合浸润性小叶和导管癌,并伴有DCIS。腋窝淋巴结清扫术中分离出19个淋巴结,其中4个表现为实性和筛状DCIS。肌球蛋白和p63免疫组化技术阳性,提示“转移性DCIS”的错误诊断。先前已经报道了另外三例淋巴结DCIS病例,所有病例都有一层带有肌动蛋白、肌球蛋白或p63的肌上皮细胞。从生物学角度来看,这些淋巴结DCIS的图像是不可信的,已经提出了三个主要假设来解释这些发现:医源性机械转运、还原性DCIS和淋巴结原发性DCIS。我们认为第一种解释是最合理的。我们的病例是独一无二的,因为同时观察到了几个罕见的发现。需要更多的新病例,再加上对先前病例的额外免疫组织化学技术和分子检测,才能找到对这一组织学发现的明确解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Espanola de Patologia
Revista Espanola de Patologia Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
34 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信