Acquired Thrombocytopenia in Contemporary Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prosthesis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-25 DOI:10.1055/a-2198-1235
Asen Petrov, Ali Taghizadeh-Waghefi, Abdel-Hannan Diab, Linda Breuer, Sebastian Arzt, Klaus Ehrhard Matschke, Konstantin Alexiou
{"title":"Acquired Thrombocytopenia in Contemporary Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prosthesis.","authors":"Asen Petrov, Ali Taghizadeh-Waghefi, Abdel-Hannan Diab, Linda Breuer, Sebastian Arzt, Klaus Ehrhard Matschke, Konstantin Alexiou","doi":"10.1055/a-2198-1235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Postprocedural thrombocytopenia is a known phenomenon following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether postinterventional platelet kinetics differ when comparing the current generation of balloon-expandable valve (BEV) and self-expanding valve (SEV) prostheses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TAVI at our facility between 2017 and 2019. Patients were stratified according to the type of prosthesis used: BEV or SEV. Hematocrit-corrected platelet counts were calculated to account for dilution. Nadir platelet counts (lowest recorded platelet count), drop platelet counts (DPC; highest relative platelet drop from baseline), and severity of thrombocytopenia during the discourse and at discharge were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the 277 included patients, 212 received SEV and 65 BEV. BEV patients were younger (81.8 ± 4.4 years vs 79.7 ± 6.8 years, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Further demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Implanted SEV were larger (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and had shorter procedural times (<i>p</i> < 0.01). There were no significant differences in postprocedural discourse. Postinterventional platelet drop was more pronounced in BEV patients in several evaluated metrics: mean DPC (24.3 ± 10.9% vs 18.8 ± 14.8%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), patients with DPC > 30% (<i>n</i> = 19, 29.2%, vs <i>n</i> = 33, 15.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.02), and also when comparing platelet kinetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Despite improvements in outcome, the current generation of balloon-expandable TAVI prostheses carries a predisposition for postprocedural thrombocytopenia even when the effects of dilution are accounted for.</p>","PeriodicalId":23057,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"264-271"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2198-1235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Postprocedural thrombocytopenia is a known phenomenon following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study is to evaluate whether postinterventional platelet kinetics differ when comparing the current generation of balloon-expandable valve (BEV) and self-expanding valve (SEV) prostheses.

Methods:  We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing TAVI at our facility between 2017 and 2019. Patients were stratified according to the type of prosthesis used: BEV or SEV. Hematocrit-corrected platelet counts were calculated to account for dilution. Nadir platelet counts (lowest recorded platelet count), drop platelet counts (DPC; highest relative platelet drop from baseline), and severity of thrombocytopenia during the discourse and at discharge were assessed.

Results:  Of the 277 included patients, 212 received SEV and 65 BEV. BEV patients were younger (81.8 ± 4.4 years vs 79.7 ± 6.8 years, p = 0.03). Further demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Implanted SEV were larger (p < 0.001) and had shorter procedural times (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in postprocedural discourse. Postinterventional platelet drop was more pronounced in BEV patients in several evaluated metrics: mean DPC (24.3 ± 10.9% vs 18.8 ± 14.8%, p < 0.01), patients with DPC > 30% (n = 19, 29.2%, vs n = 33, 15.6%, p = 0.02), and also when comparing platelet kinetics.

Conclusion:  Despite improvements in outcome, the current generation of balloon-expandable TAVI prostheses carries a predisposition for postprocedural thrombocytopenia even when the effects of dilution are accounted for.

当代经导管主动脉瓣修复术中的获得性血小板减少症。
背景:术后血小板减少症是经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的一种已知现象。本研究的目的是评估在比较当前一代可膨胀球囊(BEV)和自膨胀瓣膜假体(SEV)时,常规后血小板动力学是否不同。方法:我们对2017年至2019年间在我们机构接受TAVI的患者进行了回顾性分析。根据所用假体的类型(BEV或SEV)对患者进行分层。计算红细胞压积校正的血小板计数以说明稀释。评估讨论期间和出院时的Nadir血小板计数(记录的最低血小板计数)、血小板下降计数(DPC-与基线相比的最高相对血小板下降)和血小板减少症的严重程度。结果:277例纳入患者中,212例接受了SEV,65例接受了BEV。BEV患者更年轻(81.8±4.4岁vs 79.7±6.8岁,p=0.03)。两组之间的进一步人口统计学特征相似。植入的SEV更大(p30%(n=19,29.2%vs n=33,15.6%,p=0.02),在比较血小板动力学时也是如此。结论:尽管结果有所改善,但即使考虑到稀释的影响,当前一代球囊扩张TAVI假体也有术后血小板减少的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
365
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon publishes articles of the highest standard from internationally recognized thoracic and cardiovascular surgeons, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, physiologists, and pathologists. This journal is an essential resource for anyone working in this field. Original articles, short communications, reviews and important meeting announcements keep you abreast of key clinical advances, as well as providing the theoretical background of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. Case reports are published in our Open Access companion journal The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信