Sterilizing orthodontic appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the available methods.

Q2 Dentistry
Journal of Orthodontic Science Pub Date : 2023-09-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_53_23
Huda Abutayyem, Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Bushra Kanwal, Haytham J Alswairki, Yahya A Alogaibi
{"title":"Sterilizing orthodontic appliances: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the available methods.","authors":"Huda Abutayyem,&nbsp;Mohammad Khursheed Alam,&nbsp;Bushra Kanwal,&nbsp;Haytham J Alswairki,&nbsp;Yahya A Alogaibi","doi":"10.4103/jos.jos_53_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infection control is essential to protect both the doctor and the patient by preventing the spread of infectious diseases. There is no exception in the field of dentistry, particularly in orthodontics, where numerous appliances are used for a variety of functions and also because the mouth cavity has the highest concentration of bacteria of any body part. Through this systematic review, we aimed to assess the various methods of sterilization employed in an orthodontic setting. Using relevant keywords, reference searches, and citation searches, the databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus were all searched; a total of 206 documents were found, of which 113 were initially selected. The remaining 23 distinct papers were initially made available after 90 publications that were identical to or similar to one another were eliminated. The final selection was made from eight documents that met all inclusion and exclusion requirements. The existing methods of sterilization were found to be competent in dealing with the microorganisms found in a typical orthodontic setting. The chemical method of sterilization was the norm in most of the studies that we assessed, with glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid (PAA) being the most commonly employed compounds for disinfection. <b>PROSPERO Registration Number:</b> CRD42022380831.</p>","PeriodicalId":16604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/e2/JOS-12-51.PMC10597368.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_53_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infection control is essential to protect both the doctor and the patient by preventing the spread of infectious diseases. There is no exception in the field of dentistry, particularly in orthodontics, where numerous appliances are used for a variety of functions and also because the mouth cavity has the highest concentration of bacteria of any body part. Through this systematic review, we aimed to assess the various methods of sterilization employed in an orthodontic setting. Using relevant keywords, reference searches, and citation searches, the databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus were all searched; a total of 206 documents were found, of which 113 were initially selected. The remaining 23 distinct papers were initially made available after 90 publications that were identical to or similar to one another were eliminated. The final selection was made from eight documents that met all inclusion and exclusion requirements. The existing methods of sterilization were found to be competent in dealing with the microorganisms found in a typical orthodontic setting. The chemical method of sterilization was the norm in most of the studies that we assessed, with glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid (PAA) being the most commonly employed compounds for disinfection. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42022380831.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

消毒正畸矫治器:现有方法的系统综述和荟萃分析。
感染控制对于通过防止传染病传播来保护医生和患者至关重要。牙科领域也不例外,尤其是在正畸领域,许多器具被用于各种功能,还因为口腔中的细菌浓度是身体任何部位中最高的。通过这项系统综述,我们旨在评估正畸环境中使用的各种绝育方法。使用相关关键词、参考文献检索和引文检索,检索PubMed、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Cochrane和Scopus等数据库;共发现206份文件,其中113份是最初选定的。其余23篇不同的论文最初是在90篇彼此相同或相似的出版物被删除后提供的。最后的选择是从符合所有入选和排除要求的八份文件中选出的。现有的杀菌方法被发现能够处理在典型的正畸环境中发现的微生物。在我们评估的大多数研究中,化学灭菌方法是常态,戊二醛和过乙酸(PAA)是最常用的消毒化合物。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022380831。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthodontic Science
Journal of Orthodontic Science Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信