Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) Orders' Awareness and Perception Among Physicians: a National Survey.

Sarah Alahmadi, Mohammed Al Shahrani, Maan Albehair, Abdulrahman Alghamdi, Faten Alwayel, Alaa Turkistani, Abdullah Alahmadi, Zainab Shehab
{"title":"Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) Orders' Awareness and Perception Among Physicians: a National Survey.","authors":"Sarah Alahmadi,&nbsp;Mohammed Al Shahrani,&nbsp;Maan Albehair,&nbsp;Abdulrahman Alghamdi,&nbsp;Faten Alwayel,&nbsp;Alaa Turkistani,&nbsp;Abdullah Alahmadi,&nbsp;Zainab Shehab","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2023.77.288-292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders began when medical and surgical interventions increased the possibility of resuscitation in dying patients. Healthcare providers should start to care more about the quality of life rather than quantity. The acceptance of signing DNR orders varies among physicians owing to different reasons and conceptions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this national survey was to evaluate the extent of physicians' knowledge and attitude towards do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in different hospitals and specialties in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia and other Arab Gulf countries between March 2019 and May 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 409 physicians completed the questionnaire (53.3% male, 47% of the participants were less than 30 years of age). Most participants had their residency medical training in Saudi Arabia (73.6%, n=281); 33.5% were emergency medicine (EM) physicians. Among 409 patients, 92.7% (n=379 ) were familiar with the DNR (do-not-resuscitate) ter. Half of the participants had never discussed a DNR status with the patient or family (n=215, 52.6%), however, only 38.4% had read the policy. A total of 275 (67.2%) participants were aware that their institute had a DNR policy, and a lack of patient/family understanding was the most common barrier for the majority to initiate DNR orders (53.9%, n=222). Most of the participants (65.8%, n=269) acknowledged a lack of training and understanding of the concepts of DNR orders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most physicians who participated in this study were aware of the DNR order concept; however, half of them had never discussed or signed a DNR order. Patients and their families' misunderstandings were considered the main barriers. In addition, the lack of training in the concepts of DNR orders was considered a major obstacle.</p>","PeriodicalId":94135,"journal":{"name":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","volume":"77 4","pages":"288-292"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3c/18/medarch-77-288.PMC10591250.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2023.77.288-292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The concept of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders began when medical and surgical interventions increased the possibility of resuscitation in dying patients. Healthcare providers should start to care more about the quality of life rather than quantity. The acceptance of signing DNR orders varies among physicians owing to different reasons and conceptions.

Objective: The aim of this national survey was to evaluate the extent of physicians' knowledge and attitude towards do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders in different hospitals and specialties in Saudi Arabia.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Saudi Arabia and other Arab Gulf countries between March 2019 and May 2021.

Results: A total of 409 physicians completed the questionnaire (53.3% male, 47% of the participants were less than 30 years of age). Most participants had their residency medical training in Saudi Arabia (73.6%, n=281); 33.5% were emergency medicine (EM) physicians. Among 409 patients, 92.7% (n=379 ) were familiar with the DNR (do-not-resuscitate) ter. Half of the participants had never discussed a DNR status with the patient or family (n=215, 52.6%), however, only 38.4% had read the policy. A total of 275 (67.2%) participants were aware that their institute had a DNR policy, and a lack of patient/family understanding was the most common barrier for the majority to initiate DNR orders (53.9%, n=222). Most of the participants (65.8%, n=269) acknowledged a lack of training and understanding of the concepts of DNR orders.

Conclusion: Most physicians who participated in this study were aware of the DNR order concept; however, half of them had never discussed or signed a DNR order. Patients and their families' misunderstandings were considered the main barriers. In addition, the lack of training in the concepts of DNR orders was considered a major obstacle.

医生对不抢救(DNR)指令的认识和感知:一项全国调查。
背景:当医疗和外科干预增加了垂死患者复苏的可能性时,“不复苏”(DNR)命令的概念就开始了。医疗保健提供者应该开始更加关心生活质量,而不是数量。由于不同的原因和观念,医生对签署DNR命令的接受程度各不相同。目的:这项全国性调查的目的是评估沙特阿拉伯不同医院和专业的医生对不复苏(DNR)命令的了解程度和态度。方法:2019年3月至2021年5月,在沙特阿拉伯和其他阿拉伯海湾国家进行了一项横断面研究。结果:共有409名医生完成了问卷调查(53.3%为男性,47%的参与者年龄在30岁以下)。大多数参与者在沙特阿拉伯接受了住院医学培训(73.6%,n=281);急诊医生占33.5%。409例患者中,92.7%(n=379)熟悉DNR(不复苏)仪。一半的参与者从未与患者或家人讨论过DNR状态(n=215,52.6%),然而,只有38.4%的人阅读过该政策。共有275名(67.2%)参与者知道他们的研究所有DNR政策,缺乏患者/家人的理解是大多数人启动DNR订单的最常见障碍(53.9%,n=222)。大多数参与者(65.8%,n=269)承认缺乏对DNR订单概念的培训和理解。结论:参与本研究的大多数医生都知道DNR顺序的概念;然而,其中一半人从未讨论或签署过DNR命令。患者及其家人的误解被认为是主要障碍。此外,缺乏DNR命令概念方面的培训被认为是一个主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信