The Efficacy and Safety of Using Opioids in Acute Pancreatitis: an Update on Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohamed Almulhim, Qasem Ahmed Almulihi, Hamzah Sadiq Almumtin, Mohammed Hajay Alghanim, Doaa Ali AlAbdulbaqi, Fatimah Ahmed Ali Almulihi
{"title":"The Efficacy and Safety of Using Opioids in Acute Pancreatitis: an Update on Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Almulhim,&nbsp;Qasem Ahmed Almulihi,&nbsp;Hamzah Sadiq Almumtin,&nbsp;Mohammed Hajay Alghanim,&nbsp;Doaa Ali AlAbdulbaqi,&nbsp;Fatimah Ahmed Ali Almulihi","doi":"10.5455/medarh.2023.77.281-287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) suffer from abdominal pain that requires immediate pain relief, and there are various medication choices available, with opioids being the most prescribed analgesics.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our objective is to compare the use of opioids with other medications in emergency settings for managing pain in patients with AP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systemic search was conducted in electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar) from inception to Feb 2023. All statistical analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.4.1. The study's inclusion criteria was then selected. Only those Randomized Controlled Trials were involved that included patients having AP in an emergency setting. A random-effect model was used when heterogeneity was seen to pool the studies, and the result was reported in the Odds Ratio (OR) and Mean Difference (MD) along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Narrative analysis was conducted for those variables which did not have sufficient data be included in the quantitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We include eight Randomized Controlled Trials in our study. The Pooled result showed non-significant differences in adverse effects between the two interventions (OR 1.42 [95% CI 0.62, 3.23]; p value= 0.40; I2= 20%). While overall, significantly additional drugs were used in the control group (OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.06, 0.85]; p value= 0.03; I2= 72%). Pain score and severity levels were also analyzed. We used a narrative approach to analyze the length of stay, mean time to reach significant decrease in pain, and mortality, which were all non-conclusive. We also narratively assessed the Pediatric population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opioids do not provide significant superiority over other medications and should be avoided due to their addictive nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":94135,"journal":{"name":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","volume":"77 4","pages":"281-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bd/15/medarch-77-281.PMC10591254.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2023.77.281-287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) suffer from abdominal pain that requires immediate pain relief, and there are various medication choices available, with opioids being the most prescribed analgesics.

Objective: Our objective is to compare the use of opioids with other medications in emergency settings for managing pain in patients with AP.

Methods: A systemic search was conducted in electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Google Scholar) from inception to Feb 2023. All statistical analyses were conducted in Review Manager 5.4.1. The study's inclusion criteria was then selected. Only those Randomized Controlled Trials were involved that included patients having AP in an emergency setting. A random-effect model was used when heterogeneity was seen to pool the studies, and the result was reported in the Odds Ratio (OR) and Mean Difference (MD) along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Narrative analysis was conducted for those variables which did not have sufficient data be included in the quantitative analysis.

Results: We include eight Randomized Controlled Trials in our study. The Pooled result showed non-significant differences in adverse effects between the two interventions (OR 1.42 [95% CI 0.62, 3.23]; p value= 0.40; I2= 20%). While overall, significantly additional drugs were used in the control group (OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.06, 0.85]; p value= 0.03; I2= 72%). Pain score and severity levels were also analyzed. We used a narrative approach to analyze the length of stay, mean time to reach significant decrease in pain, and mortality, which were all non-conclusive. We also narratively assessed the Pediatric population.

Conclusion: Opioids do not provide significant superiority over other medications and should be avoided due to their addictive nature.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿片类药物治疗急性胰腺炎的疗效和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析的最新进展。
背景:大多数急性胰腺炎(AP)患者都患有腹痛,需要立即缓解疼痛,有多种药物可供选择,阿片类药物是处方最多的止痛药。目的:我们的目的是比较阿片类药物与其他药物在急诊环境中用于治疗AP患者疼痛的情况。方法:从开始到2023年2月,在电子数据库(PubMed/Medline、Cochrane Library、Embase和Google Scholar)中进行系统搜索。所有统计分析均在审查经理5.4.1中进行。然后选择该研究的纳入标准。只有那些随机对照试验包括在紧急情况下患有AP的患者。当发现异质性时,使用随机效应模型来汇集研究,结果以比值比(OR)和平均差(MD)以及相应的95%置信区间(CI)报告。对那些没有足够数据纳入定量分析的变量进行了叙述性分析。结果:我们的研究包括八项随机对照试验。综合结果显示,两种干预措施之间的不良反应无显著差异(OR 1.42[95%CI 0.62,3.23];p值=0.40;I2=20%)。总体而言,对照组使用了显著额外的药物(OR 0.22[95%CI 0.060.85];p值=0.03;I2=72%)。还分析了疼痛评分和严重程度。我们使用叙述方法来分析住院时间、疼痛显著减轻的平均时间和死亡率,这些都不是决定性的。我们还对儿科人群进行了叙述性评估。结论:阿片类药物与其他药物相比没有显著的优势,由于其成瘾性,应避免使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信