Aldo Serenelli, Achim Weiss, Conny Aerts, George C. Angelou, David Baroch, Nate Bastian, Paul G. Beck, Maria Bergemann, Joachim M. Bestenlehner, Ian Czekala, Nancy Elias-Rosa, Ana Escorza, Vincent Van Eylen, Diane K. Feuillet, Davide Gandolfi, Mark Gieles, Léo Girardi, Yveline Lebreton, Nicolas Lodieu, Marie Martig, Marcelo M. Miller Bertolami, Joey S. G. Mombarg, Juan Carlos Morales, Andrés Moya, Benard Nsamba, Krešimir Pavlovski, May G. Pedersen, Ignasi Ribas, Fabian R. N. Schneider, Victor Silva Aguirre, Keivan G. Stassun, Eline Tolstoy, Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay, Konstanze Zwintz
{"title":"Weighing stars from birth to death: mass determination methods across the HRD","authors":"Aldo Serenelli, Achim Weiss, Conny Aerts, George C. Angelou, David Baroch, Nate Bastian, Paul G. Beck, Maria Bergemann, Joachim M. Bestenlehner, Ian Czekala, Nancy Elias-Rosa, Ana Escorza, Vincent Van Eylen, Diane K. Feuillet, Davide Gandolfi, Mark Gieles, Léo Girardi, Yveline Lebreton, Nicolas Lodieu, Marie Martig, Marcelo M. Miller Bertolami, Joey S. G. Mombarg, Juan Carlos Morales, Andrés Moya, Benard Nsamba, Krešimir Pavlovski, May G. Pedersen, Ignasi Ribas, Fabian R. N. Schneider, Victor Silva Aguirre, Keivan G. Stassun, Eline Tolstoy, Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay, Konstanze Zwintz","doi":"10.1007/s00159-021-00132-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The mass of a star is the most fundamental parameter for its structure, evolution, and final fate. It is particularly important for any kind of stellar archaeology and characterization of exoplanets. There exist a variety of methods in astronomy to estimate or determine it. In this review we present a significant number of such methods, beginning with the most direct and model-independent approach using detached eclipsing binaries. We then move to more indirect and model-dependent methods, such as the quite commonly used isochrone or stellar track fitting. The arrival of quantitative asteroseismology has opened a completely new approach to determine stellar masses and to complement and improve the accuracy of other methods. We include methods for different evolutionary stages, from the pre-main sequence to evolved (super)giants and final remnants. For all methods uncertainties and restrictions will be discussed. We provide lists of altogether more than 200 benchmark stars with relative mass accuracies between <span>\\([0.3,2]\\%\\)</span> for the covered mass range of <span>\\(M\\in [0.1,16]\\,M_\\odot\\)</span>, <span>\\(75\\%\\)</span> of which are stars burning hydrogen in their core and the other <span>\\(25\\%\\)</span> covering all other evolved stages. We close with a recommendation how to combine various methods to arrive at a “mass-ladder” for stars.</p>","PeriodicalId":785,"journal":{"name":"The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":27.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00159-021-00132-9","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00159-021-00132-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
The mass of a star is the most fundamental parameter for its structure, evolution, and final fate. It is particularly important for any kind of stellar archaeology and characterization of exoplanets. There exist a variety of methods in astronomy to estimate or determine it. In this review we present a significant number of such methods, beginning with the most direct and model-independent approach using detached eclipsing binaries. We then move to more indirect and model-dependent methods, such as the quite commonly used isochrone or stellar track fitting. The arrival of quantitative asteroseismology has opened a completely new approach to determine stellar masses and to complement and improve the accuracy of other methods. We include methods for different evolutionary stages, from the pre-main sequence to evolved (super)giants and final remnants. For all methods uncertainties and restrictions will be discussed. We provide lists of altogether more than 200 benchmark stars with relative mass accuracies between \([0.3,2]\%\) for the covered mass range of \(M\in [0.1,16]\,M_\odot\), \(75\%\) of which are stars burning hydrogen in their core and the other \(25\%\) covering all other evolved stages. We close with a recommendation how to combine various methods to arrive at a “mass-ladder” for stars.
期刊介绍:
The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review is a journal that covers all areas of astronomy and astrophysics. It includes subjects related to other fields such as laboratory or particle physics, cosmic ray physics, studies in the solar system, astrobiology, instrumentation, and computational and statistical methods with specific astronomical applications. The frequency of review articles depends on the level of activity in different areas. The journal focuses on publishing review articles that are scientifically rigorous and easily comprehensible. These articles serve as a valuable resource for scientists, students, researchers, and lecturers who want to explore new or unfamiliar fields. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases including the Astrophysics Data System (ADS), BFI List, CNKI, CNPIEC, Current Contents/Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences, Dimensions, EBSCO Academic Search, EI Compendex, Japanese Science and Technology, and more.