Adverse Childhood Experiences and Preventive Cervical Cancer Screening Behavior.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Arica A Brandford, Elizabeth Nancy Williams, Gang Han, Cynthia Weston, Nancy R Downing
{"title":"Adverse Childhood Experiences and Preventive Cervical Cancer Screening Behavior.","authors":"Arica A Brandford,&nbsp;Elizabeth Nancy Williams,&nbsp;Gang Han,&nbsp;Cynthia Weston,&nbsp;Nancy R Downing","doi":"10.1188/23.ONF.679-691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine associations between a history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and receiving preventive cervical cancer screening and to investigate whether number and type of ACE exposures were predictive of cervical cancer screening uptake.</p><p><strong>Sample & setting: </strong>Data were from 11,042 adults who completed the 2020 Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines were used to indicate whether individuals had received cervical cancer screening at recommended intervals.</p><p><strong>Methods & variables: </strong>Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to predict the likelihood of not having received the recommended preventive cancer screening by number and type of ACE exposures. Chi-square analysis was used to determine associations among demographic characteristics, cancer screening uptake, and ACE number and type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with one to three ACEs and those with six or more ACEs were statistically more likely not to have received the recommended cervical cancer screenings compared to those with zero ACEs. A history of physical ACEs was associated with 3.88 times the likelihood of not having received the recommended cervical cancer screening.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing: </strong>To promote timely cervical cancer screening and prevent retraumatization of patients with a history of ACEs, providers should implement trauma-informed care principles in their healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19549,"journal":{"name":"Oncology nursing forum","volume":"50 6","pages":"679-691"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology nursing forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.679-691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine associations between a history of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and receiving preventive cervical cancer screening and to investigate whether number and type of ACE exposures were predictive of cervical cancer screening uptake.

Sample & setting: Data were from 11,042 adults who completed the 2020 Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines were used to indicate whether individuals had received cervical cancer screening at recommended intervals.

Methods & variables: Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to predict the likelihood of not having received the recommended preventive cancer screening by number and type of ACE exposures. Chi-square analysis was used to determine associations among demographic characteristics, cancer screening uptake, and ACE number and type.

Results: Individuals with one to three ACEs and those with six or more ACEs were statistically more likely not to have received the recommended cervical cancer screenings compared to those with zero ACEs. A history of physical ACEs was associated with 3.88 times the likelihood of not having received the recommended cervical cancer screening.

Implications for nursing: To promote timely cervical cancer screening and prevent retraumatization of patients with a history of ACEs, providers should implement trauma-informed care principles in their healthcare settings.

不良童年经历与预防子宫颈癌筛查行为。
目的:研究不良儿童经历史(ACEs)与接受预防性宫颈癌症筛查之间的关系,并研究ACE暴露的数量和类型是否可以预测宫颈癌症筛查的接受。样本和设置:数据来自11042名完成2020年德克萨斯州行为风险因素监测系统调查的成年人。美国预防服务特别工作组的指导方针用于说明个人是否按照建议的时间间隔接受了宫颈癌症筛查。方法和变量:采用多元逻辑回归分析,根据ACE暴露的数量和类型预测未接受推荐的癌症预防性筛查的可能性。采用卡方分析来确定人口统计学特征、癌症筛查率、ACE数量和类型之间的相关性。结果:与无ACEs的患者相比,具有1至3个ACEs的个人和具有6个或6个以上ACEs的人在统计上更有可能没有接受推荐的宫颈癌症筛查。身体ACEs病史与未接受推荐的宫颈癌症筛查的可能性的3.88倍相关。对护理的影响:为了促进癌症筛查的及时进行,并防止有ACEs病史的患者再次受伤,提供者应在其医疗环境中实施创伤形成护理原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology nursing forum
Oncology nursing forum 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Oncology Nursing Forum, an official publication of ONS, is to Convey research information related to practice, technology, education, and leadership. Disseminate oncology nursing research and evidence-based practice to enhance transdisciplinary quality cancer care. Stimulate discussion of critical issues relevant to oncology nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信