A Scoping Review on Work Experiences of Nurses After Being Diagnosed With Cancer.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Kai-Lin You, Meredith H Cummings, Catherine M Bender, Laura A Fennimore, Margaret Q Rosenzweig, Andrew M Dierkes, Ketki D Raina, Teresa Hagan Thomas
{"title":"A Scoping Review on Work Experiences of Nurses After Being Diagnosed With Cancer.","authors":"Kai-Lin You, Meredith H Cummings, Catherine M Bender, Laura A Fennimore, Margaret Q Rosenzweig, Andrew M Dierkes, Ketki D Raina, Teresa Hagan Thomas","doi":"10.1188/23.ONF.714-724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Problem identification: </strong>To map key concepts underpinning work-related studies about nurses with cancer and identify knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Literature review: </strong>A search was conducted in the PubMed®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® databases for articles about nurses with cancer and work-related topics published through March 2023.</p><p><strong>Data evaluation: </strong>The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist was used to report results, and the JBI critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of studies. Eleven articles were included.</p><p><strong>Synthesis: </strong>The following four critical concepts were identified: role adjustments at work, cancer impacts on work, organizational support, and translating insights gained from cancer experience into work. Research gaps identified by the scoping review were a lack of theoretical or conceptual frameworks, lack of syntheses of main ideas, and lack of clear data about participants' socioeconomic status across studies.</p><p><strong>Implications for research: </strong>Minimal research exists to map predictors, outcomes, or intervention targets to guide organizational strategies to support nurses' retention in the nursing workforce. A guiding framework, recruitment of diverse nurses, and focus on the four critical concepts identified in this scoping review are suggested for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":19549,"journal":{"name":"Oncology nursing forum","volume":"50 6","pages":"714-724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology nursing forum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1188/23.ONF.714-724","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem identification: To map key concepts underpinning work-related studies about nurses with cancer and identify knowledge gaps.

Literature review: A search was conducted in the PubMed®, CINAHL®, and PsycINFO® databases for articles about nurses with cancer and work-related topics published through March 2023.

Data evaluation: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist was used to report results, and the JBI critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of studies. Eleven articles were included.

Synthesis: The following four critical concepts were identified: role adjustments at work, cancer impacts on work, organizational support, and translating insights gained from cancer experience into work. Research gaps identified by the scoping review were a lack of theoretical or conceptual frameworks, lack of syntheses of main ideas, and lack of clear data about participants' socioeconomic status across studies.

Implications for research: Minimal research exists to map predictors, outcomes, or intervention targets to guide organizational strategies to support nurses' retention in the nursing workforce. A guiding framework, recruitment of diverse nurses, and focus on the four critical concepts identified in this scoping review are suggested for future research.

护士被诊断为癌症后工作经验的范围回顾。
问题识别:绘制癌症护士工作相关研究的关键概念,并确定知识差距。文献综述:在PubMed®、CINAHL®和PsycINFO®数据库中搜索截至2023年3月发表的关于癌症护士和与工作相关主题的文章。数据评估:系统评价的首选报告项目和范围界定评价的Meta-Analyses扩展检查表用于报告结果,JBI关键评估工具用于评估研究质量。收录了11篇文章。综合:确定了以下四个关键概念:工作中的角色调整、癌症对工作的影响、组织支持以及将从癌症经验中获得的见解转化为工作。范围界定审查发现的研究差距是缺乏理论或概念框架,缺乏主要思想的综合,以及缺乏关于参与者在研究中的社会经济地位的明确数据。研究意义:很少有研究绘制预测因素、结果或干预目标,以指导组织策略,支持护士在护理队伍中的保留。为未来的研究提出了一个指导框架,招聘不同的护士,并重点关注本范围审查中确定的四个关键概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology nursing forum
Oncology nursing forum 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Oncology Nursing Forum, an official publication of ONS, is to Convey research information related to practice, technology, education, and leadership. Disseminate oncology nursing research and evidence-based practice to enhance transdisciplinary quality cancer care. Stimulate discussion of critical issues relevant to oncology nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信