Combined subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker devices in complex congenital heart disease: a single-center experienced based study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Berardo Sarubbi, Giovanni Domenico Ciriello, Giovanni Papaccioli, Anna Correra, Emanuele Romeo, Nicola Grimaldi, Diego Colonna, Michela Palma
{"title":"Combined subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator and pacemaker devices in complex congenital heart disease: a single-center experienced based study.","authors":"Berardo Sarubbi, Giovanni Domenico Ciriello, Giovanni Papaccioli, Anna Correra, Emanuele Romeo, Nicola Grimaldi, Diego Colonna, Michela Palma","doi":"10.1007/s10840-023-01670-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD) are widely accepted therapy in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients at risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death (SCD) when pacing is not required. Occasionally, pacemaker (PM)-dependent CHD patients will subsequently develop an indication for a cardioverter defibrillator. The use of S-ICD in complex CHD patients who have had already PM devices implanted implies some specific considerations, as the safety for these patients in unknown and recommendations among physicians may vary widely.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We review the data and studied the indications for S-ICD in complex CHD with previous PM and discuss its usefulness in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a large cohort of 345 patients enrolled in the S-ICD Monaldi care registry, which encompass all the patients implanted in the Monaldi Hospital of Naples, we considered 11 consecutive complex CHD patients (10M/1F aged 40.4 ±18.4 years) who underwent S-ICD implant after a previous PM implant, from February 2015 to October 2022. Mean follow-up was 25.5 ± 22 months. All the patients showed a good compliance to the device system with no complications (infections or skin erosions).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In complex CHD with already implanted PM devices, S-ICD implant appears to be a safe alternative to PM upgrading to transvenous ICD system, avoiding abandoned leads or life-threatening lead extraction. However, there are important issues with regard to testing and programming that need to be addressed at the time of implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"737-747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01670-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICD) are widely accepted therapy in congenital heart disease (CHD) patients at risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death (SCD) when pacing is not required. Occasionally, pacemaker (PM)-dependent CHD patients will subsequently develop an indication for a cardioverter defibrillator. The use of S-ICD in complex CHD patients who have had already PM devices implanted implies some specific considerations, as the safety for these patients in unknown and recommendations among physicians may vary widely.

Methods: We review the data and studied the indications for S-ICD in complex CHD with previous PM and discuss its usefulness in clinical practice.

Results: From a large cohort of 345 patients enrolled in the S-ICD Monaldi care registry, which encompass all the patients implanted in the Monaldi Hospital of Naples, we considered 11 consecutive complex CHD patients (10M/1F aged 40.4 ±18.4 years) who underwent S-ICD implant after a previous PM implant, from February 2015 to October 2022. Mean follow-up was 25.5 ± 22 months. All the patients showed a good compliance to the device system with no complications (infections or skin erosions).

Conclusions: In complex CHD with already implanted PM devices, S-ICD implant appears to be a safe alternative to PM upgrading to transvenous ICD system, avoiding abandoned leads or life-threatening lead extraction. However, there are important issues with regard to testing and programming that need to be addressed at the time of implantation.

Abstract Image

复合皮下植入式心律转复除颤器和起搏器装置在复杂先天性心脏病中的应用:一项单中心经验研究
背景:皮下植入式心律转复除颤器(S-ICD)是一种广泛接受的治疗先天性心脏病(CHD)患者的方法,当不需要起搏时,这些患者有可能出现危及生命的室性心律失常或心源性猝死(SCD)。偶尔,依赖起搏器(PM)的CHD患者随后会出现心律转复除颤器的指征。在已经植入PM装置的复杂CHD患者中使用S-ICD意味着一些特定的考虑因素,因为这些患者的安全性未知,医生的建议可能差异很大。方法:我们回顾性研究了S-ICD在既往PM的复杂CHD中的适应证,并讨论了其在临床实践中的作用。结果:在纳入S-ICD Monaldi护理注册中心的345名患者中,包括在那不勒斯Monaldi医院植入的所有患者,我们考虑了2015年2月至2022年10月期间在前一次PM植入后接受S-ICD植入的11名连续复杂冠心病患者(10M/1F,年龄40.4±18.4岁)。平均随访25.5±22个月。所有患者对器械系统表现出良好的依从性,没有并发症(感染或皮肤侵蚀)。结论:在已经植入PM装置的复杂CHD中,S-ICD植入物似乎是PM升级为经静脉ICD系统的安全替代方案,避免了废弃导线或危及生命的导线提取。然而,在植入时需要解决测试和编程方面的一些重要问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信