Orofacial Myofunctional Aspects of Nursing Infants and Preschoolers.

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2023-10-23 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1759576
Andréa Monteiro Correia Medeiros, Herick Santos Assis, Maria Vanessa Martins Alves, Yasmin Fernandes Silva Santana, William José E Silva-Filho, Íkaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto, Giédre Berretin-Felix
{"title":"Orofacial Myofunctional Aspects of Nursing Infants and Preschoolers.","authors":"Andréa Monteiro Correia Medeiros,&nbsp;Herick Santos Assis,&nbsp;Maria Vanessa Martins Alves,&nbsp;Yasmin Fernandes Silva Santana,&nbsp;William José E Silva-Filho,&nbsp;Íkaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto,&nbsp;Giédre Berretin-Felix","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1759576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Clinical assessment in orofacial motricity is required for the speech therapist to diagnose and treat disorders involving the stomatognathic system. Validated tools can help establish a prognosis and outline intervention methods connected to human development. <b>Objective</b>  The goal of the present study was to examine the domains of the oromyofunctional assessment of nursing infants and preschoolers according to sex and age group, as well as the application of the MMBGR Protocol - Nursing Infants and Preschool Children. <b>Methods</b>  A quantitative technique was used to conduct an analytical and cross-sectional investigation. The present study included a total of 214 healthy breastfeeding infants and preschoolers of both sexes. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the medians. The Spearman correlation of each test domain was determined. R Core Team 2021 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) was used, and the significance threshold was set at 5%. <b>Results</b>  In intraoral and extraoral examinations, there was a difference between sexes for tongue scores in nursing infants (d = - 0.428; <i>p</i>  = 0.045), worse in males. When the orofacial functions were considered in nursing infants, there were differences between the sexes for the liquid/solid/semisolid deglutition scores (d = 0.479; <i>p</i>  = 0.031), with females performing worse. There were sex differences in solid/semisolid deglutition (d = - 0.335; <i>p</i>  = 0.043), and speech in preschoolers (d = - 0.478; <i>p</i>  = 0.034), including the production of phones/phonemes (d = - 0.599; <i>p</i>  = 0.007), which were always worse in males. <b>Conclusion</b>  The research revealed sex disparities and related the domains of oromyofunctional assessment, according to scores, of the domains of myofunctional assessment, as recorded in a standardized oromyofunctional assessment protocol by age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"27 4","pages":"e680-e686"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/3a/10-1055-s-0042-1759576.PMC10593519.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1759576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Clinical assessment in orofacial motricity is required for the speech therapist to diagnose and treat disorders involving the stomatognathic system. Validated tools can help establish a prognosis and outline intervention methods connected to human development. Objective  The goal of the present study was to examine the domains of the oromyofunctional assessment of nursing infants and preschoolers according to sex and age group, as well as the application of the MMBGR Protocol - Nursing Infants and Preschool Children. Methods  A quantitative technique was used to conduct an analytical and cross-sectional investigation. The present study included a total of 214 healthy breastfeeding infants and preschoolers of both sexes. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the medians. The Spearman correlation of each test domain was determined. R Core Team 2021 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria) was used, and the significance threshold was set at 5%. Results  In intraoral and extraoral examinations, there was a difference between sexes for tongue scores in nursing infants (d = - 0.428; p  = 0.045), worse in males. When the orofacial functions were considered in nursing infants, there were differences between the sexes for the liquid/solid/semisolid deglutition scores (d = 0.479; p  = 0.031), with females performing worse. There were sex differences in solid/semisolid deglutition (d = - 0.335; p  = 0.043), and speech in preschoolers (d = - 0.478; p  = 0.034), including the production of phones/phonemes (d = - 0.599; p  = 0.007), which were always worse in males. Conclusion  The research revealed sex disparities and related the domains of oromyofunctional assessment, according to scores, of the domains of myofunctional assessment, as recorded in a standardized oromyofunctional assessment protocol by age group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

哺乳婴儿和学龄前儿童的口面部肌功能方面。
介绍 言语治疗师需要对口腔颌面运动进行临床评估,以诊断和治疗涉及口腔颌面系统的疾病。经过验证的工具可以帮助建立预后,并概述与人类发展相关的干预方法。客观的 本研究的目的是根据性别和年龄组检查护理婴儿和学龄前儿童的口肌功能评估领域,以及MMBGR方案——护理婴儿和学前儿童的应用。方法 采用定量技术进行分析和横断面调查。本研究共包括214名健康的母乳喂养婴儿和学龄前儿童。Mann-Whitney检验用于比较中位数。确定了每个测试域的Spearman相关性。使用R核心团队2021(奥地利维也纳R基金会),显著性阈值设定为5%。后果 在口腔内和口腔外检查中,哺乳期婴儿的舌头评分存在性别差异(d = - 0.428;p = 0.045),男性更差。当在护理婴儿时考虑到口腔面部功能时,液体/固体/半固体吞咽得分在性别之间存在差异(d = 0.479;p = 0.031),女性表现更差。固体/半固体吞咽存在性别差异(d = - 0.335;p = 0.043),以及学龄前儿童的言语(d = - 0.478;p = 0.034),包括生产电话/音素(d = - 0.599;p = 0.007),而男性的情况总是更糟。结论 这项研究揭示了性别差异,并根据年龄组标准化口腔功能评估方案中记录的肌肉功能评估领域的得分,将口腔功能评估领域联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信