The co-benefits of biodiversity citizen science for well-being and nature relatedness

IF 3.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Anne C. Eichholtzer, Don A. Driscoll, Rebecca Patrick, Lorenzo Galletta, Justin Lawson
{"title":"The co-benefits of biodiversity citizen science for well-being and nature relatedness","authors":"Anne C. Eichholtzer,&nbsp;Don A. Driscoll,&nbsp;Rebecca Patrick,&nbsp;Lorenzo Galletta,&nbsp;Justin Lawson","doi":"10.1111/aphw.12502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human well-being is dependent on the health of our planet. Biodiversity-related citizen science supports conservation research, and there is increasing interest in its potential as a health co-benefits intervention.</p><p>This randomized controlled study investigates the health co-benefits of biodiversity citizen science participation. Seventy participants were randomly assigned to a citizen science project or control group for an 8-month period. Both groups completed pre- and post-intervention surveys, evaluating nature relatedness, self-efficacy related to biodiversity loss, subjective well-being, and climate change anxiety. A subset (<i>N</i> = 13) of participants engaged in the citizen science project also took part in focus group discussions.</p><p>The intervention group reported a significant increase in nature relatedness and self-efficacy to help address issues of biodiversity loss. Although no significant changes were observed for other well-being or anxiety scales, most participants reported positive outcomes related to mental or physical well-being in focus groups. There were stronger positive effects for participants without previous environmental volunteering experience.</p><p>These results suggest that citizen science participation has the potential to contribute to Planetary Health goals, with sustained co-benefits for well-being and nature relatedness. Future interventions evaluating co-benefits should consider previous environmental volunteering experience and focus on participants with little experience to maximize health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8127,"journal":{"name":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aphw.12502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied psychology. Health and well-being","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aphw.12502","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human well-being is dependent on the health of our planet. Biodiversity-related citizen science supports conservation research, and there is increasing interest in its potential as a health co-benefits intervention.

This randomized controlled study investigates the health co-benefits of biodiversity citizen science participation. Seventy participants were randomly assigned to a citizen science project or control group for an 8-month period. Both groups completed pre- and post-intervention surveys, evaluating nature relatedness, self-efficacy related to biodiversity loss, subjective well-being, and climate change anxiety. A subset (N = 13) of participants engaged in the citizen science project also took part in focus group discussions.

The intervention group reported a significant increase in nature relatedness and self-efficacy to help address issues of biodiversity loss. Although no significant changes were observed for other well-being or anxiety scales, most participants reported positive outcomes related to mental or physical well-being in focus groups. There were stronger positive effects for participants without previous environmental volunteering experience.

These results suggest that citizen science participation has the potential to contribute to Planetary Health goals, with sustained co-benefits for well-being and nature relatedness. Future interventions evaluating co-benefits should consider previous environmental volunteering experience and focus on participants with little experience to maximize health outcomes.

Abstract Image

生物多样性的共同利益公民科学的福祉和自然关系。
人类的福祉取决于我们星球的健康。与生物多样性相关的公民科学支持保护研究,人们对其作为健康共益干预措施的潜力越来越感兴趣。这项随机对照研究调查了生物多样性公民科学参与对健康的共同益处。70名参与者被随机分配到一个公民科学项目或对照组,为期8个月。两组都完成了干预前和干预后的调查,评估了自然相关性、与生物多样性丧失相关的自我效能感、主观幸福感和气候变化焦虑。子集(N = 13) 参与公民科学项目的参与者也参加了焦点小组讨论。干预小组报告称,在帮助解决生物多样性丧失问题方面,自然相关性和自我效能显著提高。尽管在其他幸福感或焦虑量表中没有观察到显著变化,但大多数参与者报告了与焦点组的心理或身体幸福感相关的积极结果。对于没有环境志愿服务经验的参与者来说,有更强的积极影响。这些结果表明,公民科学的参与有可能为行星健康目标做出贡献,为福祉和自然关系带来持续的共同利益。未来评估共同利益的干预措施应考虑以前的环境志愿服务经验,并将重点放在经验不足的参与者身上,以最大限度地提高健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being is a triannual peer-reviewed academic journal published by Wiley-Blackwell on behalf of the International Association of Applied Psychology. It was established in 2009 and covers applied psychology topics such as clinical psychology, counseling, cross-cultural psychology, and environmental psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信