Ancient and modern wheat varieties: A trade-off between soil CO2 emissions and grain yield?

Laly Rouch, Stéphane Follain, Eric Pimet, Florian Bizouard, Elodie Cognard, Olivier Mathieu, Manuel Blouin
{"title":"Ancient and modern wheat varieties: A trade-off between soil CO2 emissions and grain yield?","authors":"Laly Rouch,&nbsp;Stéphane Follain,&nbsp;Eric Pimet,&nbsp;Florian Bizouard,&nbsp;Elodie Cognard,&nbsp;Olivier Mathieu,&nbsp;Manuel Blouin","doi":"10.1002/sae2.12048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Humanity is facing two great challenges: producing enough food for a growing population and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, we investigated the choice of specific wheat varieties to improve carbon storage in soil while producing enough grain to assure food security. We hypothesize that ancient wheat varieties could store more carbon than modern ones, due to a likely bigger and deeper root system or to more recalcitrant root organic matter.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a field experiment with four modern and four ancient wheat varieties, on four different sites with contrasted soil properties. Root morphology was assessed by image analysis and potential CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by incubation for 60 days. Since in situ carbon storage differences between ancient and modern varieties were expected to be weak and not cumulated due to rotation, we estimated expected CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from root biomass and potential CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. The grain yield was also measured.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The breeding type (ancient vs. modern varieties) affected root length in two of our four sites, with longer roots for ancient varieties, but it did not affect other root traits such as biomass. The breeding type also affected CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, with higher measured CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for modern than ancient varieties in Arenic Cambisol conditions (Morvan), and higher estimated (considering root biomass variations) CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for modern varieties in Rendzic Leptosol conditions (Saint Romain). Root traits and estimated CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were also dependent on the soil properties of the different sites. We did not find any significant differences in grain yield between ancient and modern varieties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A possible trade-off between carbon storage and grain production was expected, but our results suggest that some types of soil can support both high grain yield and C storage, especially those with an important depth, a neutral pH and a fine texture.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sae2.12048","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sae2.12048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Humanity is facing two great challenges: producing enough food for a growing population and mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. In this study, we investigated the choice of specific wheat varieties to improve carbon storage in soil while producing enough grain to assure food security. We hypothesize that ancient wheat varieties could store more carbon than modern ones, due to a likely bigger and deeper root system or to more recalcitrant root organic matter.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a field experiment with four modern and four ancient wheat varieties, on four different sites with contrasted soil properties. Root morphology was assessed by image analysis and potential CO2 emissions by incubation for 60 days. Since in situ carbon storage differences between ancient and modern varieties were expected to be weak and not cumulated due to rotation, we estimated expected CO2 emissions from root biomass and potential CO2 emissions. The grain yield was also measured.

Results

The breeding type (ancient vs. modern varieties) affected root length in two of our four sites, with longer roots for ancient varieties, but it did not affect other root traits such as biomass. The breeding type also affected CO2 emissions, with higher measured CO2 emissions for modern than ancient varieties in Arenic Cambisol conditions (Morvan), and higher estimated (considering root biomass variations) CO2 emissions for modern varieties in Rendzic Leptosol conditions (Saint Romain). Root traits and estimated CO2 emissions were also dependent on the soil properties of the different sites. We did not find any significant differences in grain yield between ancient and modern varieties.

Conclusion

A possible trade-off between carbon storage and grain production was expected, but our results suggest that some types of soil can support both high grain yield and C storage, especially those with an important depth, a neutral pH and a fine texture.

Abstract Image

古代和现代小麦品种:土壤二氧化碳排放和粮食产量之间的权衡?
引言人类面临两大挑战:为不断增长的人口生产足够的粮食和减少温室气体排放。在这项研究中,我们调查了特定小麦品种的选择,以提高土壤中的碳储量,同时生产足够的粮食来确保粮食安全。我们假设,由于根系可能更大、更深,或者根系有机质更难分解,古代小麦品种可能比现代小麦品种储存更多的碳。材料和方法我们在四个不同的地点对四个现代和四个古代小麦品种进行了田间试验,并对土壤性质进行了对比。通过图像分析评估根形态,并通过培养60天评估潜在的CO2排放。由于古代和现代品种之间的原位碳储存差异预计很小,不会因轮作而累积,我们估计了根系生物量的预期二氧化碳排放量和潜在二氧化碳排放量。还测定了粮食产量。结果育种类型(古代品种与现代品种)影响了我们四个地点中的两个地点的根长,古代品种的根较长,但不影响其他根系性状,如生物量。育种类型也影响CO2排放,在Arenic Cambisol条件下(Morvan),现代品种的测量CO2排放量高于古代品种,在Rendzic Leptosol条件下(Saint-Romain),现代变种的估计CO2排放量(考虑到根系生物量的变化)更高。根系特征和估计的二氧化碳排放量也取决于不同地点的土壤特性。我们没有发现古代和现代品种之间的粮食产量有任何显著差异。结论碳储存和粮食生产之间可能存在权衡,但我们的研究结果表明,某些类型的土壤既能支持粮食高产,又能支持碳储存,尤其是那些深度重要、pH值中性、质地细腻的土壤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信