Comparison of calculation models for flexural capacity of RC beams strengthened with TRC in China and Germany

Ronghua Xu, Manfred Curbach
{"title":"Comparison of calculation models for flexural capacity of RC beams strengthened with TRC in China and Germany","authors":"Ronghua Xu,&nbsp;Manfred Curbach","doi":"10.1002/cend.202100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The new innovative composite material textile reinforced concrete (TRC) has been intensively investigated in Germany since the end 1990s. It has become increasingly important in the construction industry. Compared with conventional steel reinforcement, TRC has advantages such as higher load-bearing capacity, higher strength-to-weight ratio, better ductility, and non-corrosive behavior. This made them a subject of extensive research and diverse applications both nationally and internationally. In 2004, Xu et al. started research on bond properties of TRC in China in cooperation with Hans-Wolf Reinhardt et al. from the University of Stuttgart in Germany. Since then, there have been numerous researches on TRC in China. This article introduces a calculation method for the flexural capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with TRC in China. For comparison, the dimensioning procedure in Germany is also presented. Subsequently, the two models are compared with each other in a case study. Both models in China and Germany have the same mathematical background and also provide similar results. However, they have some differences in definitions of material characteristics (e.g., design concrete compressive strength, strain, and stress distribution) and consideration of the damage resulting from the preloading stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":100248,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Design","volume":"5 3-4","pages":"46-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cend.202100057","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cend.202100057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The new innovative composite material textile reinforced concrete (TRC) has been intensively investigated in Germany since the end 1990s. It has become increasingly important in the construction industry. Compared with conventional steel reinforcement, TRC has advantages such as higher load-bearing capacity, higher strength-to-weight ratio, better ductility, and non-corrosive behavior. This made them a subject of extensive research and diverse applications both nationally and internationally. In 2004, Xu et al. started research on bond properties of TRC in China in cooperation with Hans-Wolf Reinhardt et al. from the University of Stuttgart in Germany. Since then, there have been numerous researches on TRC in China. This article introduces a calculation method for the flexural capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) beams strengthened with TRC in China. For comparison, the dimensioning procedure in Germany is also presented. Subsequently, the two models are compared with each other in a case study. Both models in China and Germany have the same mathematical background and also provide similar results. However, they have some differences in definitions of material characteristics (e.g., design concrete compressive strength, strain, and stress distribution) and consideration of the damage resulting from the preloading stage.

Abstract Image

中德TRC加固RC梁抗弯承载力计算模型比较
自20世纪90年代末以来,德国对新型复合材料纺织钢筋混凝土(TRC)进行了深入的研究。它在建筑业中变得越来越重要。与传统钢筋相比,TRC具有承载能力高、强度重量比高、延性好、无腐蚀性等优点。这使它们成为国内外广泛研究和广泛应用的主题。2004年,徐等与德国斯图加特大学的Hans-Wolf-Reinhardt等合作,开始在中国开展TRC的键性质研究。从那时起,中国对TRC的研究就层出不穷。介绍了我国TRC加固钢筋混凝土梁的抗弯承载力计算方法。为了进行比较,还介绍了德国的尺寸标注程序。随后,在案例研究中对这两种模型进行了比较。中国和德国的两个模型都有相同的数学背景,也提供了相似的结果。然而,它们在材料特性的定义(例如,设计混凝土抗压强度、应变和应力分布)以及预压阶段造成的损伤的考虑方面存在一些差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信