Estimation of alfalfa fall dormancy using spaced plant and sward trials across multiple environments

Scott A. Newell, Daniel J. Undersander, Donald Viands, Julie Hansen, Steve Orloff, Daniel H. Putnam, E. Charles Brummer
{"title":"Estimation of alfalfa fall dormancy using spaced plant and sward trials across multiple environments","authors":"Scott A. Newell,&nbsp;Daniel J. Undersander,&nbsp;Donald Viands,&nbsp;Julie Hansen,&nbsp;Steve Orloff,&nbsp;Daniel H. Putnam,&nbsp;E. Charles Brummer","doi":"10.1002/glr2.12042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Alfalfa is a globally important forage crop. Cultivars are characterized by fall dormancy (FD). FD affects biomass yield and winter survival and is used to identify appropriate growing regions of cultivars. It has historically been assessed by measuring the natural height of regrowth in autumn of spaced plants in the field. Because commercial alfalfa is normally grown as a solid planted sward, FD could be different if plants were grown under real production conditions. The objective of this experiment was to assess whether FD ratings obtained from swards were similar to those obtained on spaced plants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated 20 alfalfa cultivars in field trials established in 2015 at five locations in the United States. We harvested the trials in early autumn and measured regrowth plant height approximately 3 weeks later in 2015 and 2016.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Autumn plant height responded as expected for the established check cultivars in all locations. Fall dormancy ratings for cultivars under both management systems were highly correlated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Estimating FD from spaced plant height measurements in autumn is very robust, and using height data from sward plots gives equivalent results to that measured in spaced plant nurseries. This finding has many practical advantages.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100593,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"15-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/glr2.12042","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/glr2.12042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Alfalfa is a globally important forage crop. Cultivars are characterized by fall dormancy (FD). FD affects biomass yield and winter survival and is used to identify appropriate growing regions of cultivars. It has historically been assessed by measuring the natural height of regrowth in autumn of spaced plants in the field. Because commercial alfalfa is normally grown as a solid planted sward, FD could be different if plants were grown under real production conditions. The objective of this experiment was to assess whether FD ratings obtained from swards were similar to those obtained on spaced plants.

Methods

We evaluated 20 alfalfa cultivars in field trials established in 2015 at five locations in the United States. We harvested the trials in early autumn and measured regrowth plant height approximately 3 weeks later in 2015 and 2016.

Results

Autumn plant height responded as expected for the established check cultivars in all locations. Fall dormancy ratings for cultivars under both management systems were highly correlated.

Conclusions

Estimating FD from spaced plant height measurements in autumn is very robust, and using height data from sward plots gives equivalent results to that measured in spaced plant nurseries. This finding has many practical advantages.

Abstract Image

利用不同环境下的间隔植物和草地试验评估苜蓿秋季休眠
背景苜蓿是全球重要的饲料作物。品种具有秋季休眠的特点。FD影响生物量产量和冬季存活,并用于确定品种的适当生长区域。历史上,它是通过测量田地里间隔植物秋季再生的自然高度来评估的。由于商业苜蓿通常是作为固体种植的草地种植的,如果植物在实际生产条件下种植,FD可能会有所不同。本实验的目的是评估从草地上获得的FD评级是否与在间隔植物上获得的评级相似。方法我们在2015年在美国五个地点建立的田间试验中评估了20个苜蓿品种。我们在初秋收获了这些试验,并在大约3周后的2015年和2016年测量了再生植株的高度。结果在所有地区,已建立的对照品种的秋季株高均符合预期。两种管理制度下品种的秋季休眠等级高度相关。结论通过秋季的间隔株高测量来估计FD是非常稳健的,并且使用草地地块的高度数据可以得到与间隔苗圃中测量的结果相当的结果。这一发现具有许多实际优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信