Towards establishing what linguists think the general public should know about language: Salient versus important issues in linguistics

IF 2.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Tomas Lehecka, Jan-Ola Östman
{"title":"Towards establishing what linguists think the general public should know about language: Salient versus important issues in linguistics","authors":"Tomas Lehecka,&nbsp;Jan-Ola Östman","doi":"10.1111/lnc3.12482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In order to develop effective strategies of science communication and public outreach in linguistics, one needs to choose what topics to prioritise in such efforts. We carried out a global online survey study among experts in linguistics (<i>n</i> = 538) asking what they perceive as the most important facts about language that the general public should be aware of. We used two distinct methods to collect the respondents' opinions: open-ended text responses and rating questions. In this paper, we compare the findings from the two tasks and we discuss the differences between them. Thus, the paper constitutes a methodologically-laden commentary on the nature of linguists' opinions on what everyone should know about language. We argue that both open-ended responses and rating questions provide valuable information about linguists' views, but from different perspectives. In particular, we see a need to distinguish between what issues are the most salient to linguists, and what issues are perceived as the most important. The aim of our study is to provide a starting point for a rich and methodologically diverse line of research—and, consequently, for an empirically-based debate—on the public relevance of language-related knowledge and the role of linguists as science communicators in disseminating that knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":47472,"journal":{"name":"Language and Linguistics Compass","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Linguistics Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to develop effective strategies of science communication and public outreach in linguistics, one needs to choose what topics to prioritise in such efforts. We carried out a global online survey study among experts in linguistics (n = 538) asking what they perceive as the most important facts about language that the general public should be aware of. We used two distinct methods to collect the respondents' opinions: open-ended text responses and rating questions. In this paper, we compare the findings from the two tasks and we discuss the differences between them. Thus, the paper constitutes a methodologically-laden commentary on the nature of linguists' opinions on what everyone should know about language. We argue that both open-ended responses and rating questions provide valuable information about linguists' views, but from different perspectives. In particular, we see a need to distinguish between what issues are the most salient to linguists, and what issues are perceived as the most important. The aim of our study is to provide a starting point for a rich and methodologically diverse line of research—and, consequently, for an empirically-based debate—on the public relevance of language-related knowledge and the role of linguists as science communicators in disseminating that knowledge.

建立语言学家认为公众应该了解的语言:语言学中的突出问题与重要问题
为了制定有效的语言学科学传播和公众宣传策略,人们需要选择在这些努力中优先考虑哪些主题。我们在语言学专家(n=538)中进行了一项全球在线调查研究,询问他们认为公众应该意识到的关于语言的最重要的事实是什么。我们使用了两种不同的方法来收集受访者的意见:开放式文本回答和评级问题。在本文中,我们比较了这两项任务的发现,并讨论了它们之间的差异。因此,本文对语言学家关于每个人都应该了解的语言的观点的本质进行了方法论的评论。我们认为,开放式回答和评级问题都提供了关于语言学家观点的宝贵信息,但视角不同。特别是,我们认为有必要区分哪些问题对语言学家来说最突出,哪些问题被认为是最重要的。我们研究的目的是为丰富和方法多样的研究提供一个起点,从而进行基于经验的辩论,研究语言相关知识的公共相关性以及语言学家作为科学传播者在传播这些知识中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language and Linguistics Compass
Language and Linguistics Compass LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Language and Linguistics Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Language and Linguistics Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Language and Linguistics Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信