Author’s Response

IF 0.2 4区哲学 0 RELIGION

International Journal of Systematic Theology Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.1111/ijst.12682

Katherine Sonderegger

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay aims to reply to the three essays devoted to Systematic Theology, volume 2. Common to all three essays is the conviction that my Trinitarian theology exhibits a kind of unicity that gives rise to inconsistencies of method and worries in matters of doctrine. My reply lays out several forms of unity and details how I hope to present proper uniformity in form and matter of dogmatics. A precis of my underlying Doctrine of Scripture and my forthcoming Christology is appended as well, as these prove central to the essayists' queries about the volume.

查看原文本刊更多论文

作者的回应

本文旨在对《系统神学》第二卷的三篇论文作出回应。这三篇文章的共同点是，我坚信我的三位一体神学表现出一种单一性，这导致了方法的不一致和对教义问题的担忧。我的答复列出了几种形式的统一，并详细说明了我希望如何在教条主义的形式和问题上表现出适当的统一。我的《圣经教义》和我即将出版的《基督论》的摘要也被附上，因为这些都是散文家对这本书的质疑的核心。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Systematic Theology RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Systematic Theology has acquired a world-wide reputation for publishing high-quality academic articles on systematic theology and for substantial reviews of major new works of scholarship. Systematic theology, which is concerned with the systematic articulation of the meaning, coherence and implications of Christian doctrine, is at the leading edge of contemporary academic theology. The discipline has undergone a remarkable transformation in the last three decades, and is now firmly established as a central area of academic teaching and research.