Title 42 and the power to exclude: Asylum seekers and the denial of entry into the United States

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Denise N. Obinna
{"title":"Title 42 and the power to exclude: Asylum seekers and the denial of entry into the United States","authors":"Denise N. Obinna","doi":"10.1111/polp.12542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Debates to “secure the border” have often dominated immigration legislation. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, this rhetoric has intensified with the use of the Title 42 program to “expel” asylum seekers without hearing the merits of their case. This article outlines how the Title 42 policy has exacerbated dangerous border crossings while advancing discriminatory policies which disproportionately affect non-White asylum seekers. Using the framework of Critical Race Theory, this article examines the impact(s) of race, ethnicity, and nationality within the immigration bureaucracy. It suggests that “race neutral” polices in immigration perpetuate racial subordination and exclusion for immigrants racialized as non-White. Intertwined with xenophobia and anti-immigrant bias, this work also suggests that public health rationales have long been used to exclude “unfit” or “unclean” migrants due to the “fear of contamination” and infection. The Title 42 program is a violation of human rights, immigration laws, and stipulations in the United Nations Charter which prohibits refugees from being expelled to countries where their lives or freedoms are threatened.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Garrett, Terence M. 2020. “The Security Apparatus, Federal Magistrate Courts, and Detention Centers as Simulacra: The Effects of Trump's Zero Tolerance Policy on Migrants and Refugees in the Rio Grande Valley.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 48(2): 372–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12348.</p>\n \n <p>Garrett, Terence M., and Arthur J. Sementelli. 2022. “COVID-19, Asylum Seekers, and Migrants on the Mexico–U.S. Border: Creating States of Exception.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 50(4): 872–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12484.</p>\n \n <p>Silverman, Stephanie J. 2012. “‘Regrettable but Necessary?’ A Historical and Theoretical Study of the Rise of the U.K. Immigration Detention Estate and Its Opposition.” <i>Politics &amp; Policy</i> 40(6): 1131–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00393.x.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"51 4","pages":"508-523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Debates to “secure the border” have often dominated immigration legislation. Since the COVID-19 pandemic began, this rhetoric has intensified with the use of the Title 42 program to “expel” asylum seekers without hearing the merits of their case. This article outlines how the Title 42 policy has exacerbated dangerous border crossings while advancing discriminatory policies which disproportionately affect non-White asylum seekers. Using the framework of Critical Race Theory, this article examines the impact(s) of race, ethnicity, and nationality within the immigration bureaucracy. It suggests that “race neutral” polices in immigration perpetuate racial subordination and exclusion for immigrants racialized as non-White. Intertwined with xenophobia and anti-immigrant bias, this work also suggests that public health rationales have long been used to exclude “unfit” or “unclean” migrants due to the “fear of contamination” and infection. The Title 42 program is a violation of human rights, immigration laws, and stipulations in the United Nations Charter which prohibits refugees from being expelled to countries where their lives or freedoms are threatened.

Related Articles

Garrett, Terence M. 2020. “The Security Apparatus, Federal Magistrate Courts, and Detention Centers as Simulacra: The Effects of Trump's Zero Tolerance Policy on Migrants and Refugees in the Rio Grande Valley.” Politics & Policy 48(2): 372–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12348.

Garrett, Terence M., and Arthur J. Sementelli. 2022. “COVID-19, Asylum Seekers, and Migrants on the Mexico–U.S. Border: Creating States of Exception.” Politics & Policy 50(4): 872–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12484.

Silverman, Stephanie J. 2012. “‘Regrettable but Necessary?’ A Historical and Theoretical Study of the Rise of the U.K. Immigration Detention Estate and Its Opposition.” Politics & Policy 40(6): 1131–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00393.x.

第42条和排除的权力:寻求庇护者和拒绝进入美国
关于“边境安全”的争论经常主导移民立法。自新冠肺炎大流行开始以来,随着使用第42条计划在没有听取案件案情的情况下“驱逐”寻求庇护者,这种言论愈演愈烈。这篇文章概述了第42条政策如何加剧了危险的过境点,同时推进了歧视性政策,对非白人寻求庇护者产生了不成比例的影响。本文运用批判性种族理论的框架,考察了种族、民族和国籍在移民官僚机构中的影响。它表明,移民中的“种族中立”政策使非白人移民的种族从属和排斥永久化。这项工作与仇外心理和反移民偏见交织在一起,还表明,由于“担心污染”和感染,公共卫生理由长期以来一直被用来排除“不适合”或“不干净”的移民。第42条计划违反了人权、移民法和《联合国宪章》中禁止将难民驱逐到其生命或自由受到威胁的国家的规定。相关文章Garrett,Terence M.2020。“模拟安全机构、联邦治安法院和拘留中心:特朗普对格兰德河流域移民和难民的零容忍政策的影响”;政策48(2):372-35。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12348.Garrett、Terence M.和Arthur J.Sementelli。2022.“新冠肺炎、寻求庇护者和墨西哥-美国边境的移民:创造例外状态”;政策50(4):872–86。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12484.西尔弗曼,斯蒂芬妮J.2012。“‘遗憾但必要?’英国移民拘留所兴起及其反对的历史与理论研究”;政策40(6):1131-57。https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2012.00393.x.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Politics & Policy
Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信