Ground glass nodules with scattered or eccentric island-shaped consolidations may have poor outcomes

Cancer Innovation Pub Date : 2023-02-23 DOI:10.1002/cai2.48
Ming Li, Junjie Xi, Huan Zhang, Xing Jin, Zhuoyang Fan, Cheng Zhan, Mingxiang Feng, Lijie Tan, Qun Wang
{"title":"Ground glass nodules with scattered or eccentric island-shaped consolidations may have poor outcomes","authors":"Ming Li,&nbsp;Junjie Xi,&nbsp;Huan Zhang,&nbsp;Xing Jin,&nbsp;Zhuoyang Fan,&nbsp;Cheng Zhan,&nbsp;Mingxiang Feng,&nbsp;Lijie Tan,&nbsp;Qun Wang","doi":"10.1002/cai2.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To explore the effect of scattered or eccentric shaped types of ground glass opacity (GGO) on outcomes of patients with solid-dominant peripheral lung adenocarcinoma.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated patients with solid-dominant peripheral lung adenocarcinoma, who underwent radical surgery at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between January 2013 and December 2015. Morphologically heterogeneous solid-dominant lung adenocarcinoma in imaging findings was based on the last preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to estimate survival differences. Impact factors were assessed by univariable logistic regression analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively collected data from 200 patients, including 170 patients with central island-shaped CT imaging, 18 patients with scattered shaped CT imaging, and 12 patients with eccentric shaped CT imaging. Eleven patients experienced recurrence or metastases. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed significant survival differences between the central island-shaped type and scattered shaped or eccentric shaped type for OS (c-stage IA: 5-year OS: 100% vs. 92.1%; HR = 0.019, <i>p</i> = 0.0025; p-stage IA: 100% vs. 95.2%; HR = 0.146, <i>p</i> = 0.1139) and RFS (c-stage IA: 5-year RFS: 100% vs. 59.7%; HR = 0.001, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; p-stage IA: 100% vs. 64.5%; HR &lt; 0.001, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Univariable logistic regression analysis showed that scattered and eccentric shaped types were related to poor outcomes (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.012, odds ratio = 18.8).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Relative spatial position of GGO and solid components may affect patient outcomes. Patients with scattered or eccentric shaped GGO may have a poor prognosis.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100212,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Innovation","volume":"2 2","pages":"148-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cai2.48","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cai2.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

To explore the effect of scattered or eccentric shaped types of ground glass opacity (GGO) on outcomes of patients with solid-dominant peripheral lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

We evaluated patients with solid-dominant peripheral lung adenocarcinoma, who underwent radical surgery at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between January 2013 and December 2015. Morphologically heterogeneous solid-dominant lung adenocarcinoma in imaging findings was based on the last preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to estimate survival differences. Impact factors were assessed by univariable logistic regression analysis.

Results

We retrospectively collected data from 200 patients, including 170 patients with central island-shaped CT imaging, 18 patients with scattered shaped CT imaging, and 12 patients with eccentric shaped CT imaging. Eleven patients experienced recurrence or metastases. Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed significant survival differences between the central island-shaped type and scattered shaped or eccentric shaped type for OS (c-stage IA: 5-year OS: 100% vs. 92.1%; HR = 0.019, p = 0.0025; p-stage IA: 100% vs. 95.2%; HR = 0.146, p = 0.1139) and RFS (c-stage IA: 5-year RFS: 100% vs. 59.7%; HR = 0.001, p < 0.0001; p-stage IA: 100% vs. 64.5%; HR < 0.001, p < 0.0001). Univariable logistic regression analysis showed that scattered and eccentric shaped types were related to poor outcomes (p < 0.012, odds ratio = 18.8).

Conclusions

Relative spatial position of GGO and solid components may affect patient outcomes. Patients with scattered or eccentric shaped GGO may have a poor prognosis.

Abstract Image

磨玻璃结节伴有散在或偏心的岛状固结可能预后不佳
背景探讨散在型或偏心型磨玻璃样混浊(GGO)对实体优势型周围型肺腺癌患者预后的影响。方法我们评估了2013年1月至2015年12月在复旦大学中山医院接受根治性手术的实体型显性周围型肺腺癌患者。形态异质性实体优势肺腺癌的影像学表现基于术前最后一次计算机断层扫描。终点为无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。Kaplan–Meier分析和对数秩检验用于估计生存差异。通过单变量逻辑回归分析评估影响因素。结果我们回顾性收集了200例患者的数据,其中170例为中心岛状CT成像,18例为散射状CT成像和12例为偏心状CT成像。11名患者出现复发或转移。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,OS的中心岛型和分散型或偏心型之间存在显著的生存差异(c期IA:5年OS:100%对92.1%;HR = 0.019,p = 0.0025;p-阶段IA:100%对95.2%;小时 = 0.146,p = 0.1139)和RFS(c期IA:5年RFS:100%对59.7%;HR = 0.001,p <; 0.0001;p阶段IA:100%对64.5%;小时 <; 0.001,p <; 0.0001)。单变量逻辑回归分析显示,分散型和偏心型与不良预后有关(p <; 0.012,比值比 = 18.8)。结论GGO和固体成分的相对空间位置可能影响患者的预后。GGO呈分散型或偏心型的患者预后可能较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信