Avoiding unnecessary suffering: Towards a moral minimum standard for humans' responsibility for animal welfare

IF 3.6 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Thomas Köllen, Doris Schneeberger
{"title":"Avoiding unnecessary suffering: Towards a moral minimum standard for humans' responsibility for animal welfare","authors":"Thomas Köllen,&nbsp;Doris Schneeberger","doi":"10.1111/beer.12565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Animals are an important part of our social, economic and corporate world. Their wellbeing is significantly affected by the ways in which humans treat them. However, animals have long remained (and, indeed, continue to remain) effectively invisible in the business ethics and corporate responsibility discourse. This article argues in favor of the moral necessity of according animal welfare a higher priority in business. In line with most streams in both recent and traditional animal ethics, this article derives the <i>avoidance of unnecessary animal suffering</i> as the moral minimum standard for responsible management in the livestock industry. Based on a broad range of different interpretations of what animal suffering may be <i>necessary</i>, the article discusses three distinct ways in which humans working in the animal industry could meet their moral responsibility to avoid <i>unnecessary</i> suffering, and, with this, increase animal welfare: by ameliorating circumstances for animals, by aiming at a two-pronged transformation, or by transforming into a “zero-suffering” business. Considering animal welfare as a legitimate ethical value in and of itself is a first step towards overcoming the anthropocentric bias in today's sustainability and corporate responsibility debate.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/beer.12565","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12565","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals are an important part of our social, economic and corporate world. Their wellbeing is significantly affected by the ways in which humans treat them. However, animals have long remained (and, indeed, continue to remain) effectively invisible in the business ethics and corporate responsibility discourse. This article argues in favor of the moral necessity of according animal welfare a higher priority in business. In line with most streams in both recent and traditional animal ethics, this article derives the avoidance of unnecessary animal suffering as the moral minimum standard for responsible management in the livestock industry. Based on a broad range of different interpretations of what animal suffering may be necessary, the article discusses three distinct ways in which humans working in the animal industry could meet their moral responsibility to avoid unnecessary suffering, and, with this, increase animal welfare: by ameliorating circumstances for animals, by aiming at a two-pronged transformation, or by transforming into a “zero-suffering” business. Considering animal welfare as a legitimate ethical value in and of itself is a first step towards overcoming the anthropocentric bias in today's sustainability and corporate responsibility debate.

避免不必要的痛苦:实现人类对动物福利责任的道德最低标准
动物是我们社会、经济和企业世界的重要组成部分。人类对待它们的方式会严重影响它们的健康。然而,动物在商业道德和企业责任话语中长期以来(事实上,继续存在)实际上是隐形的。本文认为,在商业活动中,将动物福利置于更高的优先地位在道德上是必要的。根据现代和传统动物伦理的大多数观点,本文将避免不必要的动物痛苦作为畜牧业负责任管理的道德最低标准。基于对动物痛苦可能是必要的广泛不同解释,文章讨论了在动物行业工作的人类可以通过三种不同的方式来履行他们的道德责任,避免不必要的痛苦,并以此提高动物福利:通过改善动物的环境,通过双管齐下的转变,或者转型为“零痛苦”企业。将动物福利本身视为一种合法的道德价值观,是克服当今可持续发展和企业责任辩论中以人类为中心的偏见的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信