Huifen Ye, Yunrui Ye, Yiting Wang, Tong Tong, Su Yao, Yao Xu, Qingru Hu, Yulin Liu, Changhong Liang, Guangyi Wang, Ke Zhao, Xinjuan Fan, Yanfen Cui, Zaiyi Liu
{"title":"Automated assessment of necrosis tumor ratio in colorectal cancer using an artificial intelligence-based digital pathology analysis","authors":"Huifen Ye, Yunrui Ye, Yiting Wang, Tong Tong, Su Yao, Yao Xu, Qingru Hu, Yulin Liu, Changhong Liang, Guangyi Wang, Ke Zhao, Xinjuan Fan, Yanfen Cui, Zaiyi Liu","doi":"10.1002/med4.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>With the advance in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered approaches, necrosis is proposed as a marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, most previous studies quantified necrosis merely as a tissue type and patch-level segmentation. Thus, it was worth exploring and validating the prognostic and predictive value of necrosis proportion with a pixel-level segmentation in large multicenter cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A semantic segmentation model was trained with 12 tissue types labeled by pathologists. Segmentation was performed using the U-net model with a subsequently derived necrosis tumor ratio (NTR). We proposed the NTR score (NTR-low or NTR-high) to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of necrosis for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the development (<i>N</i> = 443) and validation cohorts (<i>N</i> = 333) using 75% as a threshold.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The 2-category NTR was an independent prognostic factor and NTR-low was associated with significant prolonged DFS (unadjusted HR for high vs. low 1.72 [95% CI 1.19–2.49] and 1.98 [1.22–3.23] in the development and validation cohorts). Similar trends were observed for OS. The prognostic value of NTR was maintained in the multivariate analysis for both cohorts. Furthermore, a stratified analysis showed that NTR-high was a high risk with adjuvant chemotherapy for OS in stage II CRC (<i>p</i> = 0.047).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>AI-based pixel-level quantified NTR has a stable prognostic value in CRC associated with unfavorable survival. Additionally, adjuvant chemotherapy provided survival benefits for patients with a high NTR score in stage II CRC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100913,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/med4.9","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/med4.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
With the advance in digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered approaches, necrosis is proposed as a marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, most previous studies quantified necrosis merely as a tissue type and patch-level segmentation. Thus, it was worth exploring and validating the prognostic and predictive value of necrosis proportion with a pixel-level segmentation in large multicenter cohorts.
Methods
A semantic segmentation model was trained with 12 tissue types labeled by pathologists. Segmentation was performed using the U-net model with a subsequently derived necrosis tumor ratio (NTR). We proposed the NTR score (NTR-low or NTR-high) to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of necrosis for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the development (N = 443) and validation cohorts (N = 333) using 75% as a threshold.
Results
The 2-category NTR was an independent prognostic factor and NTR-low was associated with significant prolonged DFS (unadjusted HR for high vs. low 1.72 [95% CI 1.19–2.49] and 1.98 [1.22–3.23] in the development and validation cohorts). Similar trends were observed for OS. The prognostic value of NTR was maintained in the multivariate analysis for both cohorts. Furthermore, a stratified analysis showed that NTR-high was a high risk with adjuvant chemotherapy for OS in stage II CRC (p = 0.047).
Conclusion
AI-based pixel-level quantified NTR has a stable prognostic value in CRC associated with unfavorable survival. Additionally, adjuvant chemotherapy provided survival benefits for patients with a high NTR score in stage II CRC.