Thought Work: The Hesitant Transition to Nationalism in China's 1980s

0 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sociology Lens Pub Date : 2023-06-20 DOI:10.1111/johs.12428
Luyang Zhou
{"title":"Thought Work: The Hesitant Transition to Nationalism in China's 1980s","authors":"Luyang Zhou","doi":"10.1111/johs.12428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many scholars note that since the early 1990s, the CCP has been invoking Chinese nationalism to rescue the party's declining ideological legitimacy. Probing China's political indoctrination (thought work), this article makes two contributions to such conventional consensus. First, empirically it argues that the rise of nationalism in the 1990s was not altogether new. Instead, from the early 1980s, the CCP had been switching to “patriotism.” Second, this article argues that the communist regime's transition to nationalism was hesitant. It was an interactive process whereby multiple layers of the society and elite, confused alike, worked together to explore whether and how to embrace nationalism. The nation-building also bore the imprint of the revolutionary and state-socialist past. This article suggests that though the nation-state has become the dominant political format of the world, as a pattern it fuses with a society's traditions, preconditions, and internal struggles. Such fusions made nation-building in the non-Western world unseparated from quasi-national legacies such as revolution and socialism and could yield consequences other than capitalism and democracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Lens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.12428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many scholars note that since the early 1990s, the CCP has been invoking Chinese nationalism to rescue the party's declining ideological legitimacy. Probing China's political indoctrination (thought work), this article makes two contributions to such conventional consensus. First, empirically it argues that the rise of nationalism in the 1990s was not altogether new. Instead, from the early 1980s, the CCP had been switching to “patriotism.” Second, this article argues that the communist regime's transition to nationalism was hesitant. It was an interactive process whereby multiple layers of the society and elite, confused alike, worked together to explore whether and how to embrace nationalism. The nation-building also bore the imprint of the revolutionary and state-socialist past. This article suggests that though the nation-state has become the dominant political format of the world, as a pattern it fuses with a society's traditions, preconditions, and internal struggles. Such fusions made nation-building in the non-Western world unseparated from quasi-national legacies such as revolution and socialism and could yield consequences other than capitalism and democracy.

思想工作:20世纪80年代中国向民族主义的犹豫过渡
许多学者指出,自20世纪90年代初以来,中国共产党一直在援引中国民族主义来拯救该党日益衰落的意识形态合法性。本文探讨了中国的政治教化(思想工作),对这一传统共识作出了两点贡献。首先,从经验上讲,它认为20世纪90年代民族主义的兴起并不完全是新的。相反,从20世纪80年代初开始,中国共产党就开始转向“爱国主义”。其次,本文认为,共产党政权向民族主义的过渡是犹豫不决的。这是一个互动的过程,社会的多个层面和精英阶层,同样困惑,共同探索是否以及如何拥抱民族主义。国家建设也带有革命和国家社会主义历史的印记。本文认为,尽管民族国家已经成为世界的主导政治形式,但作为一种模式,它与社会的传统、先决条件和内部斗争相融合。这种融合使非西方世界的国家建设与革命和社会主义等准国家遗产分离开来,并可能产生资本主义和民主以外的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信