The quality of health data before and after the implementation of the electronic health management information system for the fistula program in Tanzania

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Edda Tandi Lwoga, Edwin Musheiguza
{"title":"The quality of health data before and after the implementation of the electronic health management information system for the fistula program in Tanzania","authors":"Edda Tandi Lwoga,&nbsp;Edwin Musheiguza","doi":"10.1002/isd2.12263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assessed the quality and challenges of health data before and after the implementation of the Hospital Information System (HIS) for the fistula program at the Comprehensive Community-based Rehabilitation Hospital in Tanzania. This was a mixed methods study. Data were collected at baseline and end-line (before and after the implementation of the HIS) study using quantitative Data Quality Assessment (DQA) checklists and individual interviews. At the baseline, the DQA checklists were assessed using files registered from 2017 to May 2019. At the end-line, the DQA checklists used data for a patient registered at the established HIS from June 2019 to December 2020. Interviews with clinical and non-clinical staff were conducted at both baseline and end-line studies. The study found that data quality improved after the implementation of the HIS. At baseline, data completeness declined from 85% in 2017 to 44.9% in 2019 while accuracy declined from 44% in 2017 to 31% in 2019. At the end-line, data completeness and accuracy were &gt;80% and 100% annually respectively. Data preciseness increased from 0% at baseline to 100% at the end-line. Both data completeness and accuracy had inconsistent tend over months, although preciseness could not be evaluated at baseline as no breakdown of indicators was reported. The major challenges related to data quality included language barrier, incompleteness of data, incorrect data entry, use of both manual and electronic systems, as well as unreliable electricity and network. In general, the HIS had improved rates of data quality in terms of completeness, accuracy, and preciseness of data as compared to the manual system. Policy-makers and hospital administrators should ensure that the HIS are integrated into national hospital information systems, build staff capacity, ensure reliable sources of electrical power, and regular training on data collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":46610,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/isd2.12263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the quality and challenges of health data before and after the implementation of the Hospital Information System (HIS) for the fistula program at the Comprehensive Community-based Rehabilitation Hospital in Tanzania. This was a mixed methods study. Data were collected at baseline and end-line (before and after the implementation of the HIS) study using quantitative Data Quality Assessment (DQA) checklists and individual interviews. At the baseline, the DQA checklists were assessed using files registered from 2017 to May 2019. At the end-line, the DQA checklists used data for a patient registered at the established HIS from June 2019 to December 2020. Interviews with clinical and non-clinical staff were conducted at both baseline and end-line studies. The study found that data quality improved after the implementation of the HIS. At baseline, data completeness declined from 85% in 2017 to 44.9% in 2019 while accuracy declined from 44% in 2017 to 31% in 2019. At the end-line, data completeness and accuracy were >80% and 100% annually respectively. Data preciseness increased from 0% at baseline to 100% at the end-line. Both data completeness and accuracy had inconsistent tend over months, although preciseness could not be evaluated at baseline as no breakdown of indicators was reported. The major challenges related to data quality included language barrier, incompleteness of data, incorrect data entry, use of both manual and electronic systems, as well as unreliable electricity and network. In general, the HIS had improved rates of data quality in terms of completeness, accuracy, and preciseness of data as compared to the manual system. Policy-makers and hospital administrators should ensure that the HIS are integrated into national hospital information systems, build staff capacity, ensure reliable sources of electrical power, and regular training on data collection.

坦桑尼亚瘘管病项目电子健康管理信息系统实施前后的健康数据质量
本研究评估了坦桑尼亚社区综合康复医院瘘管病项目医院信息系统实施前后健康数据的质量和挑战。这是一项混合方法研究。使用定量数据质量评估(DQA)检查表和个人访谈,在基线和终点线(HIS实施前后)收集数据。在基线时,使用2017年至2019年5月注册的文件对DQA检查表进行了评估。在最后一行,DQA检查表使用了2019年6月至2020年12月在已建立的HIS登记的患者的数据。在基线和终点研究中对临床和非临床工作人员进行了访谈。研究发现,HIS实施后,数据质量有所提高。基线时,数据完整性从2017年的85%下降到2019年的44.9%,准确率从2017年44%下降到2019的31%。在最后一行,数据的完整性和准确性 >;每年分别为80%和100%。数据精确性从基线时的0%提高到终点线时的100%。数据的完整性和准确性在几个月内都有不一致的趋势,尽管由于没有报告指标的细分,无法在基线评估准确性。与数据质量有关的主要挑战包括语言障碍、数据不完整、数据输入不正确、使用手动和电子系统以及电力和网络不可靠。总的来说,与手动系统相比,HIS在数据的完整性、准确性和准确性方面提高了数据质量。政策制定者和医院管理人员应确保HIS集成到国家医院信息系统中,建设员工能力,确保可靠的电源,并定期进行数据收集培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信