Comment on “Emerging and Near Future Challenges of Higher Education in East Asia”

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Jong-Wha Lee
{"title":"Comment on “Emerging and Near Future Challenges of Higher Education in East Asia”","authors":"Jong-Wha Lee","doi":"10.1111/aepr.12418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>East Asian economies have achieved strong progress in tertiary education since the second half of the 20th century. They have established higher education systems and institutions that are now accessible to most students. Partially thanks to the higher education systems, they have accumulated strong human capital which is pointed out as one of the major contributing factors for their astonishing economic and social developments.</p><p>Horta (<span>2023</span>) describes the rapid changes in the East Asian higher education systems and institutions driven by massification and globalization. It also identifies new challenges facing them, such as how to address decreasing enrollments and shrinking resources, how to embrace new technologies, and how to develop a long-term collaborative science base. This paper must be a useful reference for readers who want to understand the status and future challenges of higher education in the East Asia region.</p><p>I have some comments. First, Horta (<span>2023</span>) focuses on the seven economies in East Asia, such as China, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Japan, Mongolia, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan. It would be more useful to the readers of this journal if this paper added more discussion of higher education systems in other Asian economies in the South and Southeast Asian regions and pointed out variations across Asian economies. Despite some useful discussions, the paper is limited in providing an insightful analysis when comparing the characteristics of higher education across Asia. For instance, the claim that “East Asian higher education systems are at the end of the massification era and have attained universal higher education” may not apply to many countries in other Asian regions.</p><p>Second, a further discussion of the role of higher education in Asia's economic achievements, both in economic growth and income equality, would be helpful. In most Asian economies, alongside income growth, income inequality has increased in the past decades. Highly educated and skilled workers have contributed to economic growth through human capital accumulation and technological progress (Barro &amp; Lee, <span>2015</span>). In addition, the change in human capital distribution is related to income distribution. For instance, Lee and Lee (<span>2018</span>) show that educational expansion and educational inequality are significantly related to income distribution in Asian economies.</p><p>Third, one important question regarding higher education is its returns in the labor market. It is necessary to conduct a careful evaluation on the change and determinants of the returns to college education (ie college wage premium) in individual Asian economies. Horta (<span>2023</span>) asserts that “the earning premiums for those with tertiary education have been declining” in most (advanced) economies. Horta conjectures that such a decline is due to the increase in the relative supply of college-educated workers. However, studies show that the college wage premium has not declined monotonically. The college wage premium is determined by changes in the relative demand for high-skilled labor due to technological development and trade expansion, in addition to changes in relative supply.</p><p>Fourth, Horta (<span>2023</span>) rightly points out embracing new technologies as a key challenge for East Asia's higher education. Under rapidly changing technologies, education and vocational training should serve a vital role in equipping people with the adequate skills, knowledge, and attitudes they need not just for today, but also for tomorrow. Better technical skills and science knowledge can help people embrace new technologies and help economies nurture innovation-based growth. Unfortunately, current tertiary education systems in East Asian countries often fail to produce graduates with adequate skills and technical competencies relevant to the industry's needs. Education-skill mismatch is prevailing across many Asian economies.</p><p>In this regard, Horta (<span>2023</span>) suggests that universities teach bachelor-degree students in all subjects some transversal technical knowledge (such as the basics of engineering). Horta also notes that the changes, which should be effective in higher education settings, must be initiated in the early childhood period and throughout primary and secondary education. It cannot be overemphasized that basic education must be redesigned to equip all students with basic digital knowledge as well as solid cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Good-quality pre-primary, primary, and secondary education are essential for reaping more benefits from subsequent education and training. In addition, life-long learning activities should be strengthened to provide better employment opportunities for the whole population, especially the elderly. As pointed out by the author, hybrid learning modes and international collaboration can help tertiary education institutions adapt to complex demands and tackle diverse challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":45430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Economic Policy Review","volume":"18 2","pages":"194-195"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aepr.12418","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Economic Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aepr.12418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

East Asian economies have achieved strong progress in tertiary education since the second half of the 20th century. They have established higher education systems and institutions that are now accessible to most students. Partially thanks to the higher education systems, they have accumulated strong human capital which is pointed out as one of the major contributing factors for their astonishing economic and social developments.

Horta (2023) describes the rapid changes in the East Asian higher education systems and institutions driven by massification and globalization. It also identifies new challenges facing them, such as how to address decreasing enrollments and shrinking resources, how to embrace new technologies, and how to develop a long-term collaborative science base. This paper must be a useful reference for readers who want to understand the status and future challenges of higher education in the East Asia region.

I have some comments. First, Horta (2023) focuses on the seven economies in East Asia, such as China, Hong Kong SAR, Macau SAR, Japan, Mongolia, the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan. It would be more useful to the readers of this journal if this paper added more discussion of higher education systems in other Asian economies in the South and Southeast Asian regions and pointed out variations across Asian economies. Despite some useful discussions, the paper is limited in providing an insightful analysis when comparing the characteristics of higher education across Asia. For instance, the claim that “East Asian higher education systems are at the end of the massification era and have attained universal higher education” may not apply to many countries in other Asian regions.

Second, a further discussion of the role of higher education in Asia's economic achievements, both in economic growth and income equality, would be helpful. In most Asian economies, alongside income growth, income inequality has increased in the past decades. Highly educated and skilled workers have contributed to economic growth through human capital accumulation and technological progress (Barro & Lee, 2015). In addition, the change in human capital distribution is related to income distribution. For instance, Lee and Lee (2018) show that educational expansion and educational inequality are significantly related to income distribution in Asian economies.

Third, one important question regarding higher education is its returns in the labor market. It is necessary to conduct a careful evaluation on the change and determinants of the returns to college education (ie college wage premium) in individual Asian economies. Horta (2023) asserts that “the earning premiums for those with tertiary education have been declining” in most (advanced) economies. Horta conjectures that such a decline is due to the increase in the relative supply of college-educated workers. However, studies show that the college wage premium has not declined monotonically. The college wage premium is determined by changes in the relative demand for high-skilled labor due to technological development and trade expansion, in addition to changes in relative supply.

Fourth, Horta (2023) rightly points out embracing new technologies as a key challenge for East Asia's higher education. Under rapidly changing technologies, education and vocational training should serve a vital role in equipping people with the adequate skills, knowledge, and attitudes they need not just for today, but also for tomorrow. Better technical skills and science knowledge can help people embrace new technologies and help economies nurture innovation-based growth. Unfortunately, current tertiary education systems in East Asian countries often fail to produce graduates with adequate skills and technical competencies relevant to the industry's needs. Education-skill mismatch is prevailing across many Asian economies.

In this regard, Horta (2023) suggests that universities teach bachelor-degree students in all subjects some transversal technical knowledge (such as the basics of engineering). Horta also notes that the changes, which should be effective in higher education settings, must be initiated in the early childhood period and throughout primary and secondary education. It cannot be overemphasized that basic education must be redesigned to equip all students with basic digital knowledge as well as solid cognitive and non-cognitive skills. Good-quality pre-primary, primary, and secondary education are essential for reaping more benefits from subsequent education and training. In addition, life-long learning activities should be strengthened to provide better employment opportunities for the whole population, especially the elderly. As pointed out by the author, hybrid learning modes and international collaboration can help tertiary education institutions adapt to complex demands and tackle diverse challenges.

评“东亚高等教育的新挑战和近期挑战”
自20世纪下半叶以来,东亚经济体在高等教育方面取得了长足进步。他们建立了现在大多数学生都能接受的高等教育体系和机构。部分归功于高等教育制度,他们积累了强大的人力资本,这被认为是他们惊人的经济和社会发展的主要因素之一。Horta(2023)描述了在大众化和全球化的驱动下,东亚高等教育体系和机构的快速变化。它还确定了他们面临的新挑战,例如如何应对入学人数减少和资源萎缩的问题,如何接受新技术,以及如何发展长期合作的科学基础。这篇论文对于想要了解东亚地区高等教育的现状和未来挑战的读者来说一定是一个有用的参考。我有一些意见。首先,Horta(2023)关注东亚七个经济体,如中国、香港特别行政区、澳门特别行政区,日本、蒙古、大韩民国和台湾。如果本文增加对南亚和东南亚地区其他亚洲经济体高等教育系统的更多讨论,并指出亚洲经济体之间的差异,对本杂志的读者将更有用。尽管进行了一些有益的讨论,但在比较亚洲高等教育的特点时,本文仅限于提供有见地的分析。例如,“东亚高等教育体系正处于大众化时代的末期,已经实现了普及高等教育”的说法可能不适用于亚洲其他地区的许多国家。其次,进一步讨论高等教育在亚洲经济成就中的作用,包括在经济增长和收入平等方面,将是有益的。在过去几十年中,在大多数亚洲经济体,除了收入增长之外,收入不平等现象也在加剧。受过高等教育的技术工人通过人力资本积累和技术进步为经济增长做出了贡献(Barro&;Lee,2015)。此外,人力资本分配的变化与收入分配有关。例如,Lee和Lee(2018)表明,教育扩张和教育不平等与亚洲经济体的收入分配显著相关。第三,关于高等教育的一个重要问题是它在劳动力市场上的回报。有必要对亚洲个别经济体的大学教育回报率(即大学工资溢价)的变化和决定因素进行仔细评估。Horta(2023)断言,在大多数(发达)经济体中,“受过高等教育的人的收入溢价一直在下降”。Horta推测,这种下降是由于受过大学教育的工人的相对供应增加。然而,研究表明,大学工资溢价并没有单调下降。大学工资溢价是由技术发展和贸易扩张导致的对高技能劳动力的相对需求的变化以及相对供应的变化决定的。第四,Horta(2023)正确地指出,接受新技术是东亚高等教育的一个关键挑战。在快速变化的技术下,教育和职业培训应发挥至关重要的作用,使人们具备足够的技能、知识和态度,不仅是今天所需,也是明天所需。更好的技术技能和科学知识可以帮助人们接受新技术,帮助经济体培育基于创新的增长。不幸的是,东亚国家目前的高等教育体系往往无法培养出具有与行业需求相关的足够技能和技术能力的毕业生。许多亚洲经济体普遍存在教育技能不匹配现象。在这方面,Horta(2023)建议大学向所有学科的学士学位学生教授一些横向技术知识(如工程基础)。Horta还指出,这些变化应该在高等教育环境中有效,必须在幼儿期以及整个中小学教育中开始。无论如何强调都不为过,必须重新设计基础教育,使所有学生具备基本的数字知识以及扎实的认知和非认知技能。优质的学前、小学和中学教育对于从后续教育和培训中获得更多好处至关重要。此外,应加强终身学习活动,为全体人口,特别是老年人提供更好的就业机会。正如作者所指出的,混合学习模式和国际合作可以帮助高等教育机构适应复杂的需求,应对各种挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The goal of the Asian Economic Policy Review is to become an intellectual voice on the current issues of international economics and economic policy, based on comprehensive and in-depth analyses, with a primary focus on Asia. Emphasis is placed on identifying key issues at the time - spanning international trade, international finance, the environment, energy, the integration of regional economies and other issues - in order to furnish ideas and proposals to contribute positively to the policy debate in the region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信