Collections-based systematics in the new age of discovery: Celebrating the legacy and life of Professor Wen-Tsai Wang

IF 3.7 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Jun Wen, Lei Xie, Zhi-Yun Zhang, Yan Liang, Song Ge
{"title":"Collections-based systematics in the new age of discovery: Celebrating the legacy and life of Professor Wen-Tsai Wang","authors":"Jun Wen,&nbsp;Lei Xie,&nbsp;Zhi-Yun Zhang,&nbsp;Yan Liang,&nbsp;Song Ge","doi":"10.1111/jse.12945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Professor Wen-Tsai Wang (王文采, June 5, 1926–November 16, 2022) was an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and a legendary plant taxonomist at the Institute of Botany of CAS (Fig. 1). Herein, we organize a virtual special issue in <i>Journal of Systematics and Evolution</i> (JSE) to celebrate the legacy and life of Professor Wang, who was a leading plant taxonomist in China and made important contributions toward advancing the understanding of the flora of China, the biogeography of eastern Asia, and biodiversity research in the vast Hengduan Mountains. He served as the Editor-in-Chief of <i>Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica</i> (now <i>JSE</i>) for 6 years from 1982 to 1988, and trained several generations of plant taxonomists in China (Li, <span>2001</span>).</p><p>Professor Wang graduated from Beijing Normal University in 1949 and joined the Institute of Plant Taxonomy (now Institute of Botany), CAS, as a research assistant in 1950. He was promoted to the professor rank in 1982, and was elected as an academician of CAS in 1993. Professor Wang had a long, productive career at the Herbarium of the Institute of Botany, CAS (Fig. 2), and published more than 250 taxonomic and floristic papers and several monographs (Fig. 3). He described 28 new genera, 303 new taxa at the tribal, sectional, and series ranks, ca. 1370 new species, and 242 new combinations.</p><p>Professor Wang was one of the most important participants in the compilation of the enormous 8-volume series <i>Iconographia Cormophytorum Sinicorum</i> (Institute of Botany, CAS, <span>1972</span>–1983) (Fig. 4). He was first assigned to be in charge of the preparation of the book series <i>Iconographia Cormophytorum Sinicorum</i> in 1965 to set the foundation for preparing <i>Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae</i> (FRPS) and help with plant identifications in China. The book series included 11 000 higher plant species of China with brief descriptions on morphology, ecology, distribution, and uses, 9082 of which had line drawings. He contributed the treatments of several families in this book series, including Boraginaceae, Geraniaceae, Gesneriaceae, Papaveraceae, Proteaceae, Ranunculaceae, Urticaceae, and Vitaceae. This book series has been widely used by scientific institutions, colleges, and universities to train botanists and young students in biology throughout China and became the most important botanical classics from China.</p><p>Professor Wang was a taxonomic authority on several difficult plant families in China, including Boraginaceae, Rubiaceae, Ranunculaceae, Gesneriaceae, Urticaceae, and Vitaceae, through his extensive herbarium and field research (Fig. 5). He contributed several treatments to <i>Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae</i>, treating part of the Ranunculaceae (<i>Aconitum</i>, <i>Delphinium</i>, <i>Anemone</i>, and several small genera) (Wang, <span>1979</span>, <span>1980</span>), Gesneriaceae (Wang, <span>1990</span>), Boraginaceae (Kung &amp; Wang, <span>1989</span>; Wang, <span>1993</span>), and Urticaceae (Wang &amp; Chen, <span>1995</span>; Wang, <span>2014</span>, <span>2016</span>). Professor Wang retired in 1986, but he continued his research on Ranunculaceae, Boraginaceae, Urticaceae, and Gesneriaceae. From the early 1990s to the early 2000s, he visited several major herbaria abroad in Europe and United States, including BM, E, G, GH, K, LE, MHA, MO, NY, P, S, UPS, and US. He published 77 papers after he turned 85 years old, and only stopped his research quite recently in the spring of 2021 (e.g., Wang, <span>1993</span>, <span>1994</span>, <span>2000</span>,  <span>2002</span>, <span>2003</span>, <span>2004</span>, <span>2006</span>, <span>2014</span>, <span>2016</span>, <span>2018</span>, <span>2019</span>, <span>2020</span>, <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Professor Wang also contributed to the collaborative <i>Flora of China</i> project and treated Ranunculaceae (in collaboration with De-Zhi Fu and Liang-Qian Li) and Gesneriaceae (in collaboration with Kai-Yu Pan and Zhen-Yu Li). In 1996, he visited the United States National Herbarium (US) at the Smithsonian Institution, the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University (GH), the New York Botanical Garden (NY), and the Missouri Botanical Garden Herbarium (MO). During this trip, he completed the revision of Gesneriaceae for <i>Flora of China</i> with Dr. Laurence E. Skog (Smithsonian Institution) (Wang et al., <span>1998</span>).</p><p>Beyond his taxonomic and floristic studies, Professor Wang published several important papers on distribution patterns and migration routes in the Eastern Asiatic Region (Wang, <span>1989</span>, <span>1992</span>). These papers have inspired many studies on eastern Asian biogeography (Wen et al., <span>2014</span>; Nie et al., <span>2016</span>; Liu et al., <span>2021</span>; Mao et al., <span>2021</span>; Zhang et al., <span>2022</span>). The two volumes on vascular plants of the Hengduan Mountains that he edited (Wang et al., <span>1993</span>, <span>1994</span>) documented all the plants collected in this vast region based on specimens created by Chinese and western collectors. This was a major achievement at the time when herbarium collections were not easily available online or digitized. The completion of the two volumes set the foundation for systematic, biogeographic, and conservation work in this vast evolutionary hotspot in Asia.</p><p>Professor Wang trained numerous students and workers in plant taxonomy through his courses at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and many colleges, universities, and research institutes (Fig. 6). He was always humble, modest, and approachable, and taught many younger colleagues on plant taxonomy informally at the PE Herbarium (Fig. 7). He was well known for training the taxonomists in PE such as Professor De-Zhi Fu, Professor Liang-Qian Li, Professor Zhen-Yu Li, and numerous other students (Fig. 8).</p><p>Professor Wang joined the editorial board of <i>Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica</i> (now JSE) in 1973. In May 1981, as the Deputy Editor-in-Chief, he chaired a standing board meeting to reach some important agreements for the journal, such as publishing research with significant academic value or innovation, soliciting high-quality manuscripts, and adopting a strict peer-review process, which have been implemented for the journal until today. He was the Editor-in-Chief of JSE from 1982 to 1988, and after leaving the position, he continued to serve the journal in various ways. In April 1995, he wrote to the editorial office to suggest that type specimens of new species should be deposited in a recognized herbarium that is committed to long-term maintenance. He helped revise and approve Latin description or diagnosis for some JSE authors even when he was in his 80s.</p><p>Professor Wang received numerous awards and honors, such as the most prestigious First Prize of National Natural Science Award of China twice (in 1987 and 2009) (Figs. 9, 10), the Qiu Shi Science &amp; Technologies Foundation in 1996, and the Science and Technology Achievement Award from the Ho Leung Ho Lee Foundation in 1997. In 2018, Professor Wang was named the Lifetime Honorary Professor by the Institute of Botany, CAS. In 2019, he received the Commemorative Badge for Celebrating the 70th Anniversary of the Founding of the People′s Republic of China from the Chinese government.</p><p>To honor Professor Wang′s contributions to plant taxonomy, floristics, and eastern Asian biogeography and his efforts to train next-generation taxonomists, herein, we have selected 16 scientific papers recently published in JSE in the last 3 years on collections-based systematics to celebrate his life and legacy. The articles that we have selected showcase the advances in collections-based plant taxonomy, biogeography, and floristics in the new age of discovery (Wen et al., <span>2015</span>, <span>2017</span>; Funk, <span>2018</span>).</p><p>Professor Wang dedicated his career to understanding of the flora of China. We present and discuss four papers that emphasize floristic diversity and assembly in Asia. Hu et al. (<span>2020</span>) provided an updated phylogenetic tree of Chinese vascular plants, generating a mega-phylogenetic tree with 15 092 tips and 14 878 species, including 13 663 species (44.0%) and 2953 genera (95.7%) that are native to China. Beyond the tremendous scientific value of the phylogenetic framework of the Chinese flora, the study also identified hotspots of phylogenetic diversity for the Chinese angiosperms at both the genus and species levels; hence, the paper is also of great conservation significance utilizing information of phylogenetic diversity. Xie et al. (<span>2021</span>) reviewed and analyzed the floristic data from <i>The Species Catalogue of China: Volume 1: Plants</i> (SCCP), a comprehensive inventory of Chinese higher plants. The database is freely accessible at: http://www.sp2000.org.cn/, and includes entries of 478 families, 4052 genera, and 41 687 specific and infraspecific taxa. Mao et al. (<span>2021</span>) reviewed the evolutionary origin of species diversity on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), a well-known biodiversity hotspot in Asia. The authors discussed issues and advances on circumscribing and naming the QTP, the QTP uplifts, dating of molecular phylogenetic trees, and processes of species diversification and high-altitude adaptation. Low et al. (<span>2021</span>) used a phylogenetic framework of the tropical genus <i>Typhonium</i> s.s. of Araceae to reconstruct the biogeographic origin of the Asian paleotropical flora. <i>Typhonium</i> s.s. was inferred to have originated in Indochina during the early–middle Miocene and subsequent diversification within the genus may have been triggered by the intensification of the Asian monsoons around the middle Miocene. The study provides an important framework as well as a set of hypotheses for studying the origin and evolution of the Asian paleotropical floristic elements.</p><p>The tree of life or phylogenetics has become the foundation for classification and taxonomy (Wen et al., <span>2017</span>). Phylogenetic systematics has progressed tremendously in the last decade with the additional sampling of characteristics (e.g., genomics) as well as taxa, especially with the collaboration of team colleagues (Zimmer &amp; Wen, <span>2015</span>). We have selected five papers to discuss the advances in phylogenetic systematics, especially in the realm of taxonomy and classification. Soreng et al. (<span>2022</span>) updated the worldwide phylogenetic classification of the large and economically important grass family Poaceae. This revised classification includes 12 subfamilies, 7 supertribes, 54 tribes, 5 supersubtribes, 109 subtribes, and an updated list of the number of species in each of the 787 accepted genera, setting the phylogenetic framework for the conservation and scientific investigations of the grass family. In another landmark paper, Larridon et al. (<span>2021</span>) used phylogenomic data based on target enrichment sequences in conjunction with morphology and other traditional sources of data to propose a classification of the large family Cyperaceae with new tribal rearrangements and re-circumscriptions. Roalson et al. (<span>2021</span>) re-evaluated the infrageneric classification of the large and taxonomically challenging genus <i>Carex</i> using a phylogenetic framework and organizing principles that will serve as a roadmap toward ongoing progress on <i>Carex</i> classification, to reflect the current state of our knowledge while progress is being made. The hybrid classification framework organized <i>Carex</i> into six subgenera, which were then classified into 62 sections plus 49 informal groups. Wang et al. (<span>2021</span>) used target enrichment phylogenomic data, and the species tree and species network approaches to infer the phylogeny of Caprifoliaceae. They also integrated evidence from divergence times and morphology, and described Zabelioideae as a new subfamily in Caprifoliaceae. Jiang et al. (<span>2022</span>) report a case study focused on assessment of the monotypic <i>Pseudobartsia yunnanensis</i> (Orobanchaceae), which is known from a single specimen. The authors obtained chloroplast genome and nuclear ribosome sequence data from the herbarium specimen collected in 1940, and the phylogenetic analyses of Orobanchaceae using plastomes support reinstatement of <i>Pseudobartsia</i>. The study showcases the importance of herbarium collections in today′s phylogenomic and biodiversity research.</p><p>Two papers that we have selected provided insights into species delimitations (Li et al., <span>2021</span>; Lin et al., <span>2022</span>). One of the major goals of systematics is to discover and describe species; yet, species delimitation has remained highly controversial due to phenotypic plasticity, an indistinguishable morphology, and complex hybridizations (Wiens, <span>2007</span>; Wen et al., <span>2018</span>; Hillis et al., <span>2021</span>). Li et al. (<span>2021</span>) examined the cryptic diversity of the widespread <i>Roscoea tibetica</i> in the Hengduan Mountains using genotyping by sequencing, morphological traits, species distribution models, and simulating demographic history. Phylogenomic and genetic structure inferences supported two distinct lineages within <i>R. tibetica</i>, and the two lineages were also supported by several morphological characteristics discovered from field and common garden observations, as well as ecological divergence based on species distribution models. Phylogenomic, morphological, and ecological evidence was hence in support of two distinct species, but recent contact likely occurred between the two lineages. However, phenotypic plasticity in heterogeneous environments and morphological convergence in similar habitats complicated the variational patterns. Lin et al. (<span>2022</span>) explored the species delimitation of a species complex, the <i>Stewartia sinensis</i> complex (Theaceae), showing the continuum of phenotypic variations. They integrated data from phylogenomics, ecology, and morphology. The multispecies coalescent-based species delimitation using 572 nuclear orthologs based on anchored enrichment supported reciprocal (but not sister) monophyly of the northern lineage (NL) and the southern lineage (SL). Significant climatic niche differentiation was also detected between NL and SL populations, and species distribution modeling further supported their separation. Morphometric analyses also suggested significant differentiation of multiple traits. Hence, two distinct species were suggested: <i>Stewartia gemmata</i> for SL and <i>S. sinensis</i> for NL. The two studies highlight the importance of applying an integrative approach in assessing species delimitations in plants.</p><p>To honor Professor Wang′s contributions to biogeography, we have selected five recent papers that discussed the biogeographic origin and patterns in Asia and the Northern Hemisphere. Zhou et al. (<span>2021</span>) sequenced 20 single-copy nuclear genes and 14 chloroplast regions of all species in the genus <i>Paeonia</i> of Paeoniaceae to infer the phylogeny and biogeography and document the parents of tetraploids. Paeoniaceae was dated to the late Cretaceous and diverged into two clades, woody and herbaceous clades in the late Oligocene or early Miocene. They survived and diverged in the Pan-Himalaya, from where they migrated to eastern Asia and then further to Northwestern America, Middle Asia, and Europe. The glacial and interglacial cycles in Europe in the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene promoted polyploidy speciation including both allotetraploids and autotetraploids. Xu et al. (<span>2021</span>) used karst endemic genus <i>Primulina</i> as a model to identify hotspot areas in the Nanling Mountains in north Guangdong and northeast Guangxi and southeast Yungui Plateau in north and southwest Guangxi. The categorical analysis of neo- and paleoendemism suggested the karst areas in southern China as both “museums” and “cradles” of plant evolution that deserve conservation priority. Lu et al. (<span>2021</span>) supported the hypothesis that southern Japan–East China probably served as both the ancestral area and the diversification cradle for <i>Carex</i> sects. <i>Confertiflorae</i> and <i>Molliculae</i>. This study highlights the geographic heterogeneity and importance of eastern Asia for <i>Carex</i> diversification. Dong et al. (<span>2022</span>) utilized nuclear SNPs and plastome data to explore the phylogenetics of <i>Magnolia</i> and revealed extensive cytonuclear discordances. Their analyses also suggested hybridization events within sect. <i>Yulania</i>, and sect. <i>Magnolia</i>. Dating and biogeographic inferences suggested three tropical <i>Magnolia</i> disjunctions tracing to the mid to late Eocene, and two temperate disjunctions occurred much later in the Miocene, supporting the boreotropical flora hypothesis of <i>Magnolia</i> (Nie et al., <span>2008</span>). Yao et al. (<span>2021</span>) constructed the biogeographic history of the holly genus, <i>Ilex</i> (Aquifoliaceae). <i>Ilex</i> was inferred to have originated in subtropical Asia and colonized South America by c. 30 million years ago (Ma), North America by 23 Ma, Australia by 8 Ma, Europe by 6 Ma, and Africa by 4 Ma, with South and North America colonized multiple times. The genus has used efficient seed dispersal mechanisms to rapidly colonize suitable mesic areas. The near-cosmopolitan distribution of the genus reflected the dynamic balance of dispersal, diversification, and extinction, and the significance of long-distance dispersal (Wen et al., <span>2013</span>).</p><p>Professor Wang′s scientific achievements have been well known in the botanical community. Finally, we would like to share what was said about Professor Wang by one of his American friends Hayden Wetzel from Washington, DC: “<i>he was the most delightful guest and friend—gentle, direct, always positive and helpful. Almost every evening when I came home he had prepared dinner (always the same beef dish, which was fine with me). When I was traveling for about a week he told me afterward that while I was gone the house seemed lonely and he always ate at a local Chinese restaurant. What a sweet guy! A few years later, when I visited Beijing, he showed up at my hotel every morning and took me around town, until he tired out in the late afternoon. I have the most fond and pleasant memories of this lovely man</i>.”</p>","PeriodicalId":17087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systematics and Evolution","volume":"61 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jse.12945","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systematics and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jse.12945","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Professor Wen-Tsai Wang (王文采, June 5, 1926–November 16, 2022) was an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and a legendary plant taxonomist at the Institute of Botany of CAS (Fig. 1). Herein, we organize a virtual special issue in Journal of Systematics and Evolution (JSE) to celebrate the legacy and life of Professor Wang, who was a leading plant taxonomist in China and made important contributions toward advancing the understanding of the flora of China, the biogeography of eastern Asia, and biodiversity research in the vast Hengduan Mountains. He served as the Editor-in-Chief of Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (now JSE) for 6 years from 1982 to 1988, and trained several generations of plant taxonomists in China (Li, 2001).

Professor Wang graduated from Beijing Normal University in 1949 and joined the Institute of Plant Taxonomy (now Institute of Botany), CAS, as a research assistant in 1950. He was promoted to the professor rank in 1982, and was elected as an academician of CAS in 1993. Professor Wang had a long, productive career at the Herbarium of the Institute of Botany, CAS (Fig. 2), and published more than 250 taxonomic and floristic papers and several monographs (Fig. 3). He described 28 new genera, 303 new taxa at the tribal, sectional, and series ranks, ca. 1370 new species, and 242 new combinations.

Professor Wang was one of the most important participants in the compilation of the enormous 8-volume series Iconographia Cormophytorum Sinicorum (Institute of Botany, CAS, 1972–1983) (Fig. 4). He was first assigned to be in charge of the preparation of the book series Iconographia Cormophytorum Sinicorum in 1965 to set the foundation for preparing Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (FRPS) and help with plant identifications in China. The book series included 11 000 higher plant species of China with brief descriptions on morphology, ecology, distribution, and uses, 9082 of which had line drawings. He contributed the treatments of several families in this book series, including Boraginaceae, Geraniaceae, Gesneriaceae, Papaveraceae, Proteaceae, Ranunculaceae, Urticaceae, and Vitaceae. This book series has been widely used by scientific institutions, colleges, and universities to train botanists and young students in biology throughout China and became the most important botanical classics from China.

Professor Wang was a taxonomic authority on several difficult plant families in China, including Boraginaceae, Rubiaceae, Ranunculaceae, Gesneriaceae, Urticaceae, and Vitaceae, through his extensive herbarium and field research (Fig. 5). He contributed several treatments to Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, treating part of the Ranunculaceae (Aconitum, Delphinium, Anemone, and several small genera) (Wang, 19791980), Gesneriaceae (Wang, 1990), Boraginaceae (Kung & Wang, 1989; Wang, 1993), and Urticaceae (Wang & Chen, 1995; Wang, 20142016). Professor Wang retired in 1986, but he continued his research on Ranunculaceae, Boraginaceae, Urticaceae, and Gesneriaceae. From the early 1990s to the early 2000s, he visited several major herbaria abroad in Europe and United States, including BM, E, G, GH, K, LE, MHA, MO, NY, P, S, UPS, and US. He published 77 papers after he turned 85 years old, and only stopped his research quite recently in the spring of 2021 (e.g., Wang, 199319942000,  2002200320042006201420162018201920202021).

Professor Wang also contributed to the collaborative Flora of China project and treated Ranunculaceae (in collaboration with De-Zhi Fu and Liang-Qian Li) and Gesneriaceae (in collaboration with Kai-Yu Pan and Zhen-Yu Li). In 1996, he visited the United States National Herbarium (US) at the Smithsonian Institution, the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University (GH), the New York Botanical Garden (NY), and the Missouri Botanical Garden Herbarium (MO). During this trip, he completed the revision of Gesneriaceae for Flora of China with Dr. Laurence E. Skog (Smithsonian Institution) (Wang et al., 1998).

Beyond his taxonomic and floristic studies, Professor Wang published several important papers on distribution patterns and migration routes in the Eastern Asiatic Region (Wang, 19891992). These papers have inspired many studies on eastern Asian biogeography (Wen et al., 2014; Nie et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2021; Mao et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022). The two volumes on vascular plants of the Hengduan Mountains that he edited (Wang et al., 19931994) documented all the plants collected in this vast region based on specimens created by Chinese and western collectors. This was a major achievement at the time when herbarium collections were not easily available online or digitized. The completion of the two volumes set the foundation for systematic, biogeographic, and conservation work in this vast evolutionary hotspot in Asia.

Professor Wang trained numerous students and workers in plant taxonomy through his courses at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and many colleges, universities, and research institutes (Fig. 6). He was always humble, modest, and approachable, and taught many younger colleagues on plant taxonomy informally at the PE Herbarium (Fig. 7). He was well known for training the taxonomists in PE such as Professor De-Zhi Fu, Professor Liang-Qian Li, Professor Zhen-Yu Li, and numerous other students (Fig. 8).

Professor Wang joined the editorial board of Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica (now JSE) in 1973. In May 1981, as the Deputy Editor-in-Chief, he chaired a standing board meeting to reach some important agreements for the journal, such as publishing research with significant academic value or innovation, soliciting high-quality manuscripts, and adopting a strict peer-review process, which have been implemented for the journal until today. He was the Editor-in-Chief of JSE from 1982 to 1988, and after leaving the position, he continued to serve the journal in various ways. In April 1995, he wrote to the editorial office to suggest that type specimens of new species should be deposited in a recognized herbarium that is committed to long-term maintenance. He helped revise and approve Latin description or diagnosis for some JSE authors even when he was in his 80s.

Professor Wang received numerous awards and honors, such as the most prestigious First Prize of National Natural Science Award of China twice (in 1987 and 2009) (Figs. 9, 10), the Qiu Shi Science & Technologies Foundation in 1996, and the Science and Technology Achievement Award from the Ho Leung Ho Lee Foundation in 1997. In 2018, Professor Wang was named the Lifetime Honorary Professor by the Institute of Botany, CAS. In 2019, he received the Commemorative Badge for Celebrating the 70th Anniversary of the Founding of the People′s Republic of China from the Chinese government.

To honor Professor Wang′s contributions to plant taxonomy, floristics, and eastern Asian biogeography and his efforts to train next-generation taxonomists, herein, we have selected 16 scientific papers recently published in JSE in the last 3 years on collections-based systematics to celebrate his life and legacy. The articles that we have selected showcase the advances in collections-based plant taxonomy, biogeography, and floristics in the new age of discovery (Wen et al., 20152017; Funk, 2018).

Professor Wang dedicated his career to understanding of the flora of China. We present and discuss four papers that emphasize floristic diversity and assembly in Asia. Hu et al. (2020) provided an updated phylogenetic tree of Chinese vascular plants, generating a mega-phylogenetic tree with 15 092 tips and 14 878 species, including 13 663 species (44.0%) and 2953 genera (95.7%) that are native to China. Beyond the tremendous scientific value of the phylogenetic framework of the Chinese flora, the study also identified hotspots of phylogenetic diversity for the Chinese angiosperms at both the genus and species levels; hence, the paper is also of great conservation significance utilizing information of phylogenetic diversity. Xie et al. (2021) reviewed and analyzed the floristic data from The Species Catalogue of China: Volume 1: Plants (SCCP), a comprehensive inventory of Chinese higher plants. The database is freely accessible at: http://www.sp2000.org.cn/, and includes entries of 478 families, 4052 genera, and 41 687 specific and infraspecific taxa. Mao et al. (2021) reviewed the evolutionary origin of species diversity on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), a well-known biodiversity hotspot in Asia. The authors discussed issues and advances on circumscribing and naming the QTP, the QTP uplifts, dating of molecular phylogenetic trees, and processes of species diversification and high-altitude adaptation. Low et al. (2021) used a phylogenetic framework of the tropical genus Typhonium s.s. of Araceae to reconstruct the biogeographic origin of the Asian paleotropical flora. Typhonium s.s. was inferred to have originated in Indochina during the early–middle Miocene and subsequent diversification within the genus may have been triggered by the intensification of the Asian monsoons around the middle Miocene. The study provides an important framework as well as a set of hypotheses for studying the origin and evolution of the Asian paleotropical floristic elements.

The tree of life or phylogenetics has become the foundation for classification and taxonomy (Wen et al., 2017). Phylogenetic systematics has progressed tremendously in the last decade with the additional sampling of characteristics (e.g., genomics) as well as taxa, especially with the collaboration of team colleagues (Zimmer & Wen, 2015). We have selected five papers to discuss the advances in phylogenetic systematics, especially in the realm of taxonomy and classification. Soreng et al. (2022) updated the worldwide phylogenetic classification of the large and economically important grass family Poaceae. This revised classification includes 12 subfamilies, 7 supertribes, 54 tribes, 5 supersubtribes, 109 subtribes, and an updated list of the number of species in each of the 787 accepted genera, setting the phylogenetic framework for the conservation and scientific investigations of the grass family. In another landmark paper, Larridon et al. (2021) used phylogenomic data based on target enrichment sequences in conjunction with morphology and other traditional sources of data to propose a classification of the large family Cyperaceae with new tribal rearrangements and re-circumscriptions. Roalson et al. (2021) re-evaluated the infrageneric classification of the large and taxonomically challenging genus Carex using a phylogenetic framework and organizing principles that will serve as a roadmap toward ongoing progress on Carex classification, to reflect the current state of our knowledge while progress is being made. The hybrid classification framework organized Carex into six subgenera, which were then classified into 62 sections plus 49 informal groups. Wang et al. (2021) used target enrichment phylogenomic data, and the species tree and species network approaches to infer the phylogeny of Caprifoliaceae. They also integrated evidence from divergence times and morphology, and described Zabelioideae as a new subfamily in Caprifoliaceae. Jiang et al. (2022) report a case study focused on assessment of the monotypic Pseudobartsia yunnanensis (Orobanchaceae), which is known from a single specimen. The authors obtained chloroplast genome and nuclear ribosome sequence data from the herbarium specimen collected in 1940, and the phylogenetic analyses of Orobanchaceae using plastomes support reinstatement of Pseudobartsia. The study showcases the importance of herbarium collections in today′s phylogenomic and biodiversity research.

Two papers that we have selected provided insights into species delimitations (Li et al., 2021; Lin et al., 2022). One of the major goals of systematics is to discover and describe species; yet, species delimitation has remained highly controversial due to phenotypic plasticity, an indistinguishable morphology, and complex hybridizations (Wiens, 2007; Wen et al., 2018; Hillis et al., 2021). Li et al. (2021) examined the cryptic diversity of the widespread Roscoea tibetica in the Hengduan Mountains using genotyping by sequencing, morphological traits, species distribution models, and simulating demographic history. Phylogenomic and genetic structure inferences supported two distinct lineages within R. tibetica, and the two lineages were also supported by several morphological characteristics discovered from field and common garden observations, as well as ecological divergence based on species distribution models. Phylogenomic, morphological, and ecological evidence was hence in support of two distinct species, but recent contact likely occurred between the two lineages. However, phenotypic plasticity in heterogeneous environments and morphological convergence in similar habitats complicated the variational patterns. Lin et al. (2022) explored the species delimitation of a species complex, the Stewartia sinensis complex (Theaceae), showing the continuum of phenotypic variations. They integrated data from phylogenomics, ecology, and morphology. The multispecies coalescent-based species delimitation using 572 nuclear orthologs based on anchored enrichment supported reciprocal (but not sister) monophyly of the northern lineage (NL) and the southern lineage (SL). Significant climatic niche differentiation was also detected between NL and SL populations, and species distribution modeling further supported their separation. Morphometric analyses also suggested significant differentiation of multiple traits. Hence, two distinct species were suggested: Stewartia gemmata for SL and S. sinensis for NL. The two studies highlight the importance of applying an integrative approach in assessing species delimitations in plants.

To honor Professor Wang′s contributions to biogeography, we have selected five recent papers that discussed the biogeographic origin and patterns in Asia and the Northern Hemisphere. Zhou et al. (2021) sequenced 20 single-copy nuclear genes and 14 chloroplast regions of all species in the genus Paeonia of Paeoniaceae to infer the phylogeny and biogeography and document the parents of tetraploids. Paeoniaceae was dated to the late Cretaceous and diverged into two clades, woody and herbaceous clades in the late Oligocene or early Miocene. They survived and diverged in the Pan-Himalaya, from where they migrated to eastern Asia and then further to Northwestern America, Middle Asia, and Europe. The glacial and interglacial cycles in Europe in the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene promoted polyploidy speciation including both allotetraploids and autotetraploids. Xu et al. (2021) used karst endemic genus Primulina as a model to identify hotspot areas in the Nanling Mountains in north Guangdong and northeast Guangxi and southeast Yungui Plateau in north and southwest Guangxi. The categorical analysis of neo- and paleoendemism suggested the karst areas in southern China as both “museums” and “cradles” of plant evolution that deserve conservation priority. Lu et al. (2021) supported the hypothesis that southern Japan–East China probably served as both the ancestral area and the diversification cradle for Carex sects. Confertiflorae and Molliculae. This study highlights the geographic heterogeneity and importance of eastern Asia for Carex diversification. Dong et al. (2022) utilized nuclear SNPs and plastome data to explore the phylogenetics of Magnolia and revealed extensive cytonuclear discordances. Their analyses also suggested hybridization events within sect. Yulania, and sect. Magnolia. Dating and biogeographic inferences suggested three tropical Magnolia disjunctions tracing to the mid to late Eocene, and two temperate disjunctions occurred much later in the Miocene, supporting the boreotropical flora hypothesis of Magnolia (Nie et al., 2008). Yao et al. (2021) constructed the biogeographic history of the holly genus, Ilex (Aquifoliaceae). Ilex was inferred to have originated in subtropical Asia and colonized South America by c. 30 million years ago (Ma), North America by 23 Ma, Australia by 8 Ma, Europe by 6 Ma, and Africa by 4 Ma, with South and North America colonized multiple times. The genus has used efficient seed dispersal mechanisms to rapidly colonize suitable mesic areas. The near-cosmopolitan distribution of the genus reflected the dynamic balance of dispersal, diversification, and extinction, and the significance of long-distance dispersal (Wen et al., 2013).

Professor Wang′s scientific achievements have been well known in the botanical community. Finally, we would like to share what was said about Professor Wang by one of his American friends Hayden Wetzel from Washington, DC: “he was the most delightful guest and friend—gentle, direct, always positive and helpful. Almost every evening when I came home he had prepared dinner (always the same beef dish, which was fine with me). When I was traveling for about a week he told me afterward that while I was gone the house seemed lonely and he always ate at a local Chinese restaurant. What a sweet guy! A few years later, when I visited Beijing, he showed up at my hotel every morning and took me around town, until he tired out in the late afternoon. I have the most fond and pleasant memories of this lovely man.”

Abstract Image

新发现时代的集合系统学——纪念王教授的遗产与生平
王教授(王文采, 1926年6月5日至2022年11月16日)是中国科学院(CAS)院士和CAS植物研究所的传奇植物分类学家(图1)。在此,我们在《系统学与进化杂志》(JSE)上组织了一期虚拟特刊,以庆祝王教授的遗产和生命,他是我国著名的植物分类学家,为深入了解中国植物区系、东亚生物地理学和横断山区生物多样性研究做出了重要贡献。1982年至1988年任《植物分类学报》主编6年,培养了我国几代植物分类学家(李,2001)。王教授1949年毕业于北京师范大学,1950年进入CAS植物分类研究所(现植物研究所)任研究助理。1982年晋升教授级,1993年当选为CAS院士。王教授在CAS植物研究所植物标本馆有着漫长而富有成效的职业生涯(图2),发表了250多篇分类学和区系论文以及多部专著(图3)。他描述了28个新属,303个部落、科和系级新分类群,约1370个新物种,242个新组合。王教授是8卷本巨著《中华植物志》系列丛书(CAS植物研究所,1972-1983)(图4)的最重要参与者之一。1965年,他首次被指派负责《中华植物图》系列丛书的编写,为《中国植物志》的编写奠定了基础并帮助在中国进行植物鉴定。该系列丛书包括11本 000种中国高等植物,并对其形态、生态学、分布和用途进行了简要描述,其中9082种有白描。他在这本书系列中贡献了几个科的治疗方法,包括紫草科、Geraniaceae、苦苣苔科、罂粟科、蛋白质科、毛茛科、荨麻科和维生素科。该系列丛书已被中国各地的科研机构、高等院校广泛用于培养植物学家和生物学青年学生,成为中国最重要的植物学经典。王教授是中国几个疑难植物科的分类学权威,包括紫草科、茜草科、毛茛科、苦苣苔科、荨麻科和维生素科,通过他广泛的植物标本馆和实地研究(图5)。他为《中华人民共和国植物志》贡献了几种治疗方法,治疗毛茛科的一部分(乌头属、飞燕草属、银莲花属和几个小属)(王,19791980)、苦苣苔科(王,1990)、紫草科(龚和王,1989;王,1993)和荨麻科(王和陈,1995;王,20142016)。王教授于1986年退休,但他继续对毛茛科、紫草科、荨麻科和苦苣苔科进行研究。从20世纪90年代初到21世纪初,他访问了欧洲和美国国外的几个主要草药库,包括BM、E、G、GH、K、LE、MHA、MO、NY、P、S、UPS和US,直到最近的2021年春天才停止了他的研究(例如,王,1993199420002002200320042006201420162018201920021)。王教授还参与了合作的《中国植物志》项目,并对毛茛科(与德志夫和梁倩丽合作)和苦苣苔科(与潘开宇和甄玉丽合作)进行了研究。1996年,他参观了史密森学会的美国国家植物标本馆(US)、哈佛大学格雷植物标本馆、纽约植物园和密苏里植物园植物标本馆。在这次访问中,他与Laurence E.Skog博士(史密森学会)共同完成了《中国苦苣苔科植物志》的修订工作(王等,1998)。除了分类学和区系学研究外,王教授还发表了几篇关于东亚地区分布格局和迁移路线的重要论文(王,19891992)。这些论文启发了许多关于东亚生物地理学的研究(Wen et al.,2014;聂等人,2016;刘等人,2021;毛等人,2021年;张等人,2022)。他编辑的关于横断山脉维管植物的两卷本(Wang et al.,19931994)记录了根据中国和西方收藏家创造的标本在这一广阔地区采集的所有植物。这是一项重大成就,当时植物标本馆的藏品不容易在网上或数字化。这两卷的完成为亚洲这个巨大的进化热点的系统、生物地理学和保护工作奠定了基础。 王教授通过在中国科学院和许多学院、大学和研究所的课程,培养了许多植物分类学的学生和工作者(图6)。他总是谦逊、谦逊、平易近人,并在植物标本馆非正式地教授了许多年轻的同事植物分类学(图7)。他以培养体育分类学家而闻名,如德志夫教授、梁倩丽教授、甄玉丽教授和许多其他学生(图8)。王教授于1973年加入《植物分类学报》(现JSE)编委会。1981年5月,作为副主编,他主持了一次常务委员会会议,为该杂志达成了一些重要协议,如发表具有重大学术价值或创新的研究,征集高质量的手稿,以及采用严格的同行评审程序,这些协议一直在该杂志上实施到今天。1982年至1988年,他担任《JSE》主编,离职后,他继续以各种方式为该杂志服务。1995年4月,他写信给编辑部,建议将新物种的模式标本存放在一个致力于长期维护的公认植物标本馆。王教授在80多岁的时候就帮助一些JSE作者修改和批准了拉丁文描述或诊断;1996年获科技基金资助,1997年获何梁何利基金科技成就奖。2018年,王教授被CAS植物研究所评为终身名誉教授。2019年获中国政府颁发的“庆祝中华人民共和国成立70周年纪念章”。为了表彰王教授在植物分类学、植物区系学和东亚生物地理学方面的贡献,以及他为培养下一代分类学家所做的努力,我们选择了过去3年中最近发表在JSE上的16篇关于基于集合的系统学的科学论文,以庆祝他的一生和遗产。我们选择的文章展示了新发现时代植物分类学、生物地理学和植物区系学的进展(Wen et al.,20152017;Funk,2018)。王教授致力于了解中国植物区系。我们提出并讨论了四篇论文,强调亚洲的植物区系多样性和聚集性。胡等人(2020)提供了一个更新的中国维管植物系统发育树,生成了一个包含15 092提示和14 878种,其中13种 中国特有种663种(44.0%),属2953属(95.7%)。除了中国植物区系发育框架的巨大科学价值外,该研究还确定了中国被子植物在属和种水平上的系统发育多样性热点;因此,利用系统发育多样性的信息,本文也具有重要的保护意义。谢等人(2021)查阅并分析了中国高等植物综合目录《中国物种目录:第一卷:植物》的区系数据。该数据库可在以下网址免费访问:http://www.sp2000.org.cn/,包括478科4052属41个条目 687个特异性和次特异性分类群。毛等人(2021)回顾了亚洲著名的生物多样性热点青藏高原物种多样性的进化起源。作者讨论了QTP的界定和命名、QTP隆起、分子系统发育树的年代测定、物种多样化和高海拔适应过程等方面的问题和进展。Low等人(2021)利用天南星科热带台风属的系统发育框架重建了亚洲古热带植物区系的生物地理起源。Typhonium s.s.被推测起源于中新世早期至中期的中印,随后该属的多样化可能是由中新世中期附近亚洲季风的增强引发的。该研究为研究亚洲古热带植物区系元素的起源和演化提供了一个重要的框架和一套假设。生命树或系统发育学已成为分类和分类学的基础(Wen et al.,2017)。系统发育系统学在过去十年中取得了巨大进展,对特征(如基因组学)和分类群进行了额外的采样,尤其是在团队同事的合作下(Zimmer&amp;Wen,2015)。我们选择了五篇论文来讨论系统发育系统学的进展,特别是在分类学和分类领域。Soreng等人。 (2022)更新了世界范围内具有重要经济意义的大型禾本科禾本科的系统发育分类。这一修订后的分类包括12个亚科、7个超部落、54个部落、5个超亚部落、109个亚部落,以及787个已接受属中每个属的物种数量更新列表,为草科的保护和科学调查奠定了系统发育框架。在另一篇具有里程碑意义的论文中,Larridon等人(2021)利用基于靶标富集序列的系统发育数据,结合形态学和其他传统数据来源,提出了一个具有新的部落重排和重新限制的莎草科大家族分类。Roalson等人(2021)使用系统发育框架和组织原则重新评估了大型且在分类学上具有挑战性的苔草属的亚属分类,这将成为苔草分类正在取得进展的路线图,以反映我们在取得进展的同时的知识现状。混合分类框架将苔草分为六个亚属,然后将其分为62个部分和49个非正式类群。王等人(2021)利用目标富集系统发育学数据,以及种树和种网络方法推断了七叶菊科的系统发育。他们还整合了分化时间和形态学的证据,并将Zabelioideae描述为Caprifoliate科中的一个新亚科。姜等人(2022)报道了一项案例研究,重点评估了从单个标本中已知的单型云南假巴尔西亚(列当科)。作者从1940年采集的植物标本中获得了叶绿体基因组和核核糖体序列数据,并利用质体对列当科植物的系统发育分析支持了Pseudobartsia的恢复。该研究展示了植物标本馆收藏在当今系统发育和生物多样性研究中的重要性。我们选择的两篇论文为物种划界提供了见解(Li et al.,2021;Lin et al.,2022)。系统学的主要目标之一是发现和描述物种;然而,由于表型可塑性、不可区分的形态和复杂的杂交,物种划界仍然存在很大争议(Wiens,2007;Wen等人,2018;Hillis等人,2021)。李等人(2021)通过测序、形态特征、物种分布模型进行基因分型,研究了横断山区广泛分布的西藏蔷薇的隐蔽多样性,以及模拟人口统计历史。系统发育基因组学和遗传结构推断支持西藏乳杆菌中的两个不同谱系,这两个谱系也得到了野外和普通花园观察中发现的几个形态特征以及基于物种分布模型的生态差异的支持。因此,系统发育基因组、形态学和生态学证据支持两个不同的物种,但最近两个谱系之间可能发生了接触。然而,异质环境中的表型可塑性和相似生境中的形态趋同使变异模式复杂化。林等人(2022)探索了一个物种复合体——中华Stewartia sinensis复合体(山茶科)的物种划界,显示了表型变异的连续性。他们整合了系统发育组学、生态学和形态学的数据。基于锚定富集的572个核直向同源物的基于多物种联合的物种划界支持北方谱系(NL)和南方谱系(SL)的互惠(但不是姐妹)单系。在NL和SL种群之间也发现了显著的气候生态位分化,物种分布模型进一步支持了它们的分离。形态计量学分析也表明多个性状的显著分化。因此,提出了两个不同的物种:SL的Stewartia gemmata和NL的S.sinensis。这两项研究强调了应用综合方法评估植物物种划界的重要性。为了表彰王教授对生物地理学的贡献,我们挑选了五篇最近发表的论文,讨论了亚洲和北半球的生物地理学起源和模式。周等人(2021)对芍药科芍药属所有物种的20个单拷贝核基因和14个叶绿体区域进行了测序,以推断系统发育和生物地理学,并记录四倍体的亲本。芍药科的时代可以追溯到白垩纪晚期,在渐新世晚期或中新世早期分化为木质和草本两个分支。它们在泛喜马拉雅地区生存并分化,从那里迁移到东亚,然后进一步迁移到西北美洲、中亚和欧洲。欧洲上新世晚期和更新世早期的冰川和间冰川周期促进了多倍体物种形成,包括同源四倍体和同源四倍体。 徐等人(2021)以岩溶特有属Primulina为模型,确定了粤北、桂东北南岭和桂北、桂西南云贵高原东南部的热点地区。对新、古地方性的分类分析表明,中国南方岩溶地区既是植物进化的“博物馆”,又是植物进化的摇篮,值得优先保护。鲁等人(2021)支持这样一种假设,即日本南部-华东地区可能既是Carex教派的祖先地区,也是其多样化的摇篮。Confertiflorae和Molculae。这项研究强调了东亚的地理异质性和对苔草多样化的重要性。董等人(2022)利用细胞核SNPs和质体数据来探索木兰属的系统发育学,并揭示了广泛的细胞核不一致性。他们的分析也暗示了教派内部的杂交事件。Yulania和教派。木兰花。年代测定和生物地理学推断表明,三个热带木兰属的间断可以追溯到始新世中晚期,两个温带的间断发生在中新世晚期,支持了木兰属的北方营养植物群假说(Nie et al.,2008)。Yao et al.(2021)构建了冬青属冬青属(冬青科)的生物地理学历史。冬青树被认为起源于亚热带亚洲,并于约30年在南美洲殖民 百万年前(Ma),北美23 马,澳大利亚8 马,欧洲6 马和非洲4 马曾多次随南美洲和北美洲殖民。该属利用有效的种子传播机制迅速在适宜的中部地区定植。该属的近世界分布反映了扩散、多样化和灭绝的动态平衡,以及远距离扩散的意义(Wen et al.,2013)。王教授的科学成就在植物学界广为人知。最后,我们想分享一下来自华盛顿的一位美国朋友Hayden Wetzel对王教授的评价,DC:“他是最令人愉快的客人和朋友——温柔、直接、总是积极和乐于助人。几乎每天晚上我回家时,他都会准备晚餐(总是一样的牛肉菜,我很满意)。”当我旅行了大约一个星期后,他告诉我,我不在的时候,家里似乎很孤独,他总是在当地的一家中餐馆吃饭。多么可爱的家伙!几年后,当我访问北京时,他每天早上都会出现在我的酒店,带我在城里转一圈,直到下午晚些时候他累了。我对这个可爱的男人有着最美好的回忆。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
Journal of Systematics and Evolution Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1368
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Systematics and Evolution (JSE, since 2008; formerly Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica) is a plant-based international journal newly dedicated to the description and understanding of the biological diversity. It covers: description of new taxa, monographic revision, phylogenetics, molecular evolution and genome evolution, evolutionary developmental biology, evolutionary ecology, population biology, conservation biology, biogeography, paleobiology, evolutionary theories, and related subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信