Are Phosphatidic Acids Ubiquitous in Mammalian Tissues or Overemphasized in Mass Spectrometry Imaging Applications?

IF 3.4 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Gregory W. Vandergrift, Jessica K. Lukowski, Michael J. Taylor, Kevin J. Zemaitis, Theodore Alexandrov, Josie G. Eder, Heather M. Olson, Jennifer E. Kyle, Christopher Anderton
{"title":"Are Phosphatidic Acids Ubiquitous in Mammalian Tissues or Overemphasized in Mass Spectrometry Imaging Applications?","authors":"Gregory W. Vandergrift,&nbsp;Jessica K. Lukowski,&nbsp;Michael J. Taylor,&nbsp;Kevin J. Zemaitis,&nbsp;Theodore Alexandrov,&nbsp;Josie G. Eder,&nbsp;Heather M. Olson,&nbsp;Jennifer E. Kyle,&nbsp;Christopher Anderton","doi":"10.1002/anse.202200112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is an invaluable tool for the spatial visualization of molecules in vivo. However, the question of whether observed annotations are endogenous or artificial (i. e., from in-source fragmentation) is critical and has been largely unexplored in multimodal MSI. In matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MSI datasets from researchers worldwide, PAs were found to represent up to 18 % of annotations in rat brain. Rat brain was additionally imaged here using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization (nano-DESI), a softer ionization strategy. No PAs observed with MALDI were present in the nano-DESI dataset. Further investigation strongly indicated lipid fragmentation to PAs for MALDI-MSI, but not with nano-DESI-MSI. We finally extend this observation to the MALDI-MSI analyses of human tissues, showing that PA annotations comprised up to 16 % of annotations. Therefore, this study shows that MSI annotations should be carefully interrogated, as in-source fragmentation or modification of lipids may contribute substantially to false annotations and incorrect biological interpretations.</p>","PeriodicalId":72192,"journal":{"name":"Analysis & sensing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anse.202200112","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analysis & sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anse.202200112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) is an invaluable tool for the spatial visualization of molecules in vivo. However, the question of whether observed annotations are endogenous or artificial (i. e., from in-source fragmentation) is critical and has been largely unexplored in multimodal MSI. In matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI)-MSI datasets from researchers worldwide, PAs were found to represent up to 18 % of annotations in rat brain. Rat brain was additionally imaged here using nanospray desorption electrospray ionization (nano-DESI), a softer ionization strategy. No PAs observed with MALDI were present in the nano-DESI dataset. Further investigation strongly indicated lipid fragmentation to PAs for MALDI-MSI, but not with nano-DESI-MSI. We finally extend this observation to the MALDI-MSI analyses of human tissues, showing that PA annotations comprised up to 16 % of annotations. Therefore, this study shows that MSI annotations should be carefully interrogated, as in-source fragmentation or modification of lipids may contribute substantially to false annotations and incorrect biological interpretations.

Abstract Image

磷脂酸在哺乳动物组织中普遍存在还是在质谱成像应用中被过度强调?
质谱成像(MSI)是体内分子空间可视化的宝贵工具。然而,观察到的注释是内源性的还是人工的问题(i。 e.来自源内碎片)是关键的,并且在多模式MSI中基本上未被探索。在来自世界各地研究人员的基质辅助激光解吸/电离(MALDI)-MSI数据集中,发现PA代表多达18 % 大鼠大脑中的注释。在这里,使用纳米喷雾解吸电喷雾电离(nano-DESI)对大鼠大脑进行了额外成像,这是一种较软的电离策略。在纳米DESI数据集中不存在用MALDI观察到的PA。进一步的研究强烈表明,MALDI-MSI的脂质片段化为PA,但纳米DESI-MSI没有。最后,我们将这一观察结果扩展到人类组织的MALDI-MSI分析,显示PA注释包含多达16个 % 的注释。因此,本研究表明,应仔细询问MSI注释,因为脂质的来源片段化或修饰可能会导致错误注释和不正确的生物学解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信