The contribution of crowdfunding for philanthropy: A systematic review and framework of donation and reward crowdfunding

IF 1.5 Q3 BUSINESS
Claire van Teunenbroek, Carolina Dalla Chiesa, Laura Hesse
{"title":"The contribution of crowdfunding for philanthropy: A systematic review and framework of donation and reward crowdfunding","authors":"Claire van Teunenbroek,&nbsp;Carolina Dalla Chiesa,&nbsp;Laura Hesse","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.1791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Which novelties do donation- and reward-based crowdfunding bring to philanthropy? Scholars interested in crowdfunding contributed to developing empirical explanations on which features impact online giving. However, the focus on theory building is limited. We developed a theoretical framework by categorizing the empirical findings reported in 198 studies, which resulted in four crowdfunding features impacting giving: (1) project creator, (2) social information, (3) rewards, and (4) project description. We explain why these features impact giving by integrating them with insights from several fields of social sciences, deriving seven giving mechanisms. We conclude that with impacting donations via crowdfunding, three giving themes exist: being affected by (1) the perceived project's quality, (2) social connections and/or (3) tangible rewards. The categorization of mechanisms for giving allows initiators to extract best practice examples for increasing the probability of successful crowdfunding projects considering the giving mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"28 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/nvsm.1791","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.1791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Which novelties do donation- and reward-based crowdfunding bring to philanthropy? Scholars interested in crowdfunding contributed to developing empirical explanations on which features impact online giving. However, the focus on theory building is limited. We developed a theoretical framework by categorizing the empirical findings reported in 198 studies, which resulted in four crowdfunding features impacting giving: (1) project creator, (2) social information, (3) rewards, and (4) project description. We explain why these features impact giving by integrating them with insights from several fields of social sciences, deriving seven giving mechanisms. We conclude that with impacting donations via crowdfunding, three giving themes exist: being affected by (1) the perceived project's quality, (2) social connections and/or (3) tangible rewards. The categorization of mechanisms for giving allows initiators to extract best practice examples for increasing the probability of successful crowdfunding projects considering the giving mechanisms.

Abstract Image

众筹对慈善事业的贡献:捐赠和奖励众筹的系统回顾与框架
基于捐赠和奖励的众筹为慈善事业带来了哪些新奇之处?对众筹感兴趣的学者们为开发哪些特征影响在线捐赠的实证解释做出了贡献。然而,对理论建设的关注是有限的。我们通过对198项研究中报告的实证结果进行分类,建立了一个理论框架,得出了影响捐赠的四个众筹特征:(1)项目创建者,(2)社会信息,(3)奖励,和(4)项目描述。我们通过将这些特征与社会科学几个领域的见解相结合,得出七种给予机制,来解释为什么这些特征会影响给予。我们得出的结论是,通过众筹影响捐赠,存在三个捐赠主题:受(1)感知项目质量的影响,(2)社会关系和/或(3)有形回报的影响。捐赠机制的分类允许发起人提取最佳实践示例,以提高考虑捐赠机制的众筹项目成功的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信