Paradoxes of implementing digital manufacturing systems: A longitudinal study of digital innovation projects for disruptive change

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Lukas Moschko, Vera Blazevic, Frank T. Piller
{"title":"Paradoxes of implementing digital manufacturing systems: A longitudinal study of digital innovation projects for disruptive change","authors":"Lukas Moschko,&nbsp;Vera Blazevic,&nbsp;Frank T. Piller","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital manufacturing technologies offer many opportunities for established companies to innovate. They promote data-driven gains in operational efficiency and enable the transformation of current business models or the creation of entirely new differentiation opportunities. However, many digital innovation projects in manufacturing fall short of their initial ambitions and result in incremental improvements to an existing manufacturing system, if at all. To understand the reasons for the discrepancy between initial ambitions and achieved outcomes, we conduct a longitudinal qualitative study based on a collaborative research project with eight companies and additional expert interviews. Applying a paradox lens, we identify three tensional knots that reveal interrelated, multiple tensions of digital innovation management projects in established manufacturing firms: (1) amalgamating physical and digital assets, (2) innovating in an existing modus operandi, and (3) integrating internal and external stakeholders. These tensions result in the simultaneous occurrence of dynamic and conflicting forces that turn digital innovation projects in manufacturing away from their high initial ambitions. Our findings explain why digitizing the manufacturing system is a non-trivial endeavor for established firms, which need to balance the complexities inherent in digitization efforts and manage conflicting goals. For managers, the findings provide ways to manage the interrelated tensions in their digital innovation efforts, enabling them to better capitalize on disruptive innovation ambitions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"40 4","pages":"506-529"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpim.12667","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12667","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Digital manufacturing technologies offer many opportunities for established companies to innovate. They promote data-driven gains in operational efficiency and enable the transformation of current business models or the creation of entirely new differentiation opportunities. However, many digital innovation projects in manufacturing fall short of their initial ambitions and result in incremental improvements to an existing manufacturing system, if at all. To understand the reasons for the discrepancy between initial ambitions and achieved outcomes, we conduct a longitudinal qualitative study based on a collaborative research project with eight companies and additional expert interviews. Applying a paradox lens, we identify three tensional knots that reveal interrelated, multiple tensions of digital innovation management projects in established manufacturing firms: (1) amalgamating physical and digital assets, (2) innovating in an existing modus operandi, and (3) integrating internal and external stakeholders. These tensions result in the simultaneous occurrence of dynamic and conflicting forces that turn digital innovation projects in manufacturing away from their high initial ambitions. Our findings explain why digitizing the manufacturing system is a non-trivial endeavor for established firms, which need to balance the complexities inherent in digitization efforts and manage conflicting goals. For managers, the findings provide ways to manage the interrelated tensions in their digital innovation efforts, enabling them to better capitalize on disruptive innovation ambitions.

Abstract Image

实施数字制造系统的悖论:颠覆性变革的数字创新项目纵向研究
数字化制造技术为老牌公司提供了许多创新机会。它们促进了数据驱动的运营效率提高,并使当前的商业模式转型或创造全新的差异化机会成为可能。然而,制造业的许多数字创新项目未能实现其最初的雄心,并导致对现有制造系统的逐步改进(如果有的话)。为了了解最初的抱负和实现的结果之间存在差异的原因,我们在与八家公司的合作研究项目和额外的专家访谈的基础上进行了一项纵向定性研究。运用悖论视角,我们确定了三个张力节点,揭示了老牌制造企业数字创新管理项目的相互关联的多重张力:(1)合并实物和数字资产,(2)以现有的运作方式进行创新,以及(3)整合内部和外部利益相关者。这些紧张局势导致动态和冲突的力量同时发生,使制造业的数字创新项目偏离了最初的雄心壮志。我们的研究结果解释了为什么对老牌企业来说,数字化制造系统是一项不平凡的努力,它们需要平衡数字化工作中固有的复杂性,并管理相互冲突的目标。对于管理者来说,这些发现提供了管理他们数字创新努力中相互关联的紧张关系的方法,使他们能够更好地利用颠覆性的创新雄心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信