Cyclostratigraphy at a tipping point

Geology Today Pub Date : 2023-06-08 DOI:10.1111/gto.12429
Robin Bailey
{"title":"Cyclostratigraphy at a tipping point","authors":"Robin Bailey","doi":"10.1111/gto.12429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There are key patterns of variation in the (litho-) stratigraphical record, which, with advances in computing technology in recent decades, have become amenable to objective numerical analysis. This research has chiefly focused on the search for spatially regular cycles in the sedimentary rock record, since there are theoretical grounds for believing that these would be periodic and thus provide a means of time-calibrating the stratigraphical records in which they occurred. Less popular lines of research consider the scaling relationships of the tangible, measurable sedimentary rock layers, and of the hiatuses, individually of indeterminate length, that punctuate these layers. Objective source data for all these analyses is provided, on limited (usually decametre) scales, by detailed lithological logging, sampling and dating of sections provided by exposures and cores. An objective global lithostratigraphical database, with larger, kilometre scales, is provided by the widespread practice of electric (wire-line) logging of deep wells. This involves measurement, at 6-inch (~15 cm) depth intervals of lithology-related petrophysical properties. Rapid desk top computer analysis of the hundreds or thousands of readings that comprise these two data series, searches for patterns of variation. This review considers the published evidence for ‘ubiquitous’ cyclicity and its use in chronostratigraphy, despite the contrary claims that stratigraphical records are predominantly random in character.</p>","PeriodicalId":100581,"journal":{"name":"Geology Today","volume":"39 3","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geology Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gto.12429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There are key patterns of variation in the (litho-) stratigraphical record, which, with advances in computing technology in recent decades, have become amenable to objective numerical analysis. This research has chiefly focused on the search for spatially regular cycles in the sedimentary rock record, since there are theoretical grounds for believing that these would be periodic and thus provide a means of time-calibrating the stratigraphical records in which they occurred. Less popular lines of research consider the scaling relationships of the tangible, measurable sedimentary rock layers, and of the hiatuses, individually of indeterminate length, that punctuate these layers. Objective source data for all these analyses is provided, on limited (usually decametre) scales, by detailed lithological logging, sampling and dating of sections provided by exposures and cores. An objective global lithostratigraphical database, with larger, kilometre scales, is provided by the widespread practice of electric (wire-line) logging of deep wells. This involves measurement, at 6-inch (~15 cm) depth intervals of lithology-related petrophysical properties. Rapid desk top computer analysis of the hundreds or thousands of readings that comprise these two data series, searches for patterns of variation. This review considers the published evidence for ‘ubiquitous’ cyclicity and its use in chronostratigraphy, despite the contrary claims that stratigraphical records are predominantly random in character.

处于临界点的旋回地层学
近几十年来,随着计算技术的进步,(岩性)地层记录中有一些关键的变化模式,这些模式已经可以进行客观的数值分析。这项研究主要集中在寻找沉积岩记录中的空间规则旋回,因为有理论依据相信这些旋回是周期性的,从而提供了一种时间校准它们发生的地层记录的方法。不太受欢迎的研究路线考虑了有形的、可测量的沉积岩层的比例关系,以及打断这些岩层的不确定长度的间断的比例关系。所有这些分析的目标源数据都是在有限的(通常是十米)范围内,通过详细的岩性测井、暴露和岩心提供的剖面取样和测年来提供的。深井电(线)测井的广泛实践提供了一个更大、公里尺度的客观全球岩石地层数据库。这包括在6英寸(~15 cm)与岩性相关的岩石物理性质的深度间隔。台式计算机对这两个数据系列中的数百或数千个读数进行快速分析,寻找变化模式。这篇综述考虑了“普遍存在”的旋回性及其在时间地层学中的应用的已发表证据,尽管有相反的说法认为地层记录主要是随机的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信