Public policy research in Colombia: State of the art (phase 1), 2008–2018

IF 1.4 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

Politics & Policy Pub Date : 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1111/polp.12536

María Victoria Whittingham

{"title":"Public policy research in Colombia: State of the art (phase 1), 2008–2018","authors":"María Victoria Whittingham","doi":"10.1111/polp.12536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>This review article presents the results of an exploratory study for illuminating the state of the research concerning public policy in Colombia. A core assumption of the project is that the national capacity (intellectual capital) for producing relevant and thorough research in public policy, theory and practice, is a key element for the quality of its democracy and the sustainability of the system. A systematic documentary review of the research papers produced between 2008 and 2018 was conducted, spanning a total of 1010 papers. The results point to the relevance of continuing this type of study within Colombia and to the need of involving all the stakeholders in a dialogue about how to improve the country's capacity to design, implement, and evaluate sound public policies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Related Articles</h3>\n \n <p>Asongu, Simplice A. 2016. “Sino-African Relations: A Review and Reconciliation of Dominant Schools of Thought.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 44(2): 351–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12152.</p>\n \n <p>De Lombaerde, Philippe. 2015. “The Political Economy of Trade Protection in Colombia.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 43(6): 855–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12140.</p>\n \n <p>Seefeldt, Jennapher Lunde. 2020. “Lessons from the Lithium Triangle: Considering Policy Explanations for the Variation in Lithium Industry Development in the ‘Lithium Triangle’ Countries of Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia.” <i>Politics & Policy</i> 48(4): 727–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12365.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51679,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Policy","volume":"51 3","pages":"397-414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/polp.12536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

This review article presents the results of an exploratory study for illuminating the state of the research concerning public policy in Colombia. A core assumption of the project is that the national capacity (intellectual capital) for producing relevant and thorough research in public policy, theory and practice, is a key element for the quality of its democracy and the sustainability of the system. A systematic documentary review of the research papers produced between 2008 and 2018 was conducted, spanning a total of 1010 papers. The results point to the relevance of continuing this type of study within Colombia and to the need of involving all the stakeholders in a dialogue about how to improve the country's capacity to design, implement, and evaluate sound public policies.

Asongu, Simplice A. 2016. “Sino-African Relations: A Review and Reconciliation of Dominant Schools of Thought.” Politics & Policy 44(2): 351–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12152.

De Lombaerde, Philippe. 2015. “The Political Economy of Trade Protection in Colombia.” Politics & Policy 43(6): 855–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12140.

Seefeldt, Jennapher Lunde. 2020. “Lessons from the Lithium Triangle: Considering Policy Explanations for the Variation in Lithium Industry Development in the ‘Lithium Triangle’ Countries of Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia.” Politics & Policy 48(4): 727–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12365.

查看原文本刊更多论文

哥伦比亚公共政策研究：最新情况（第一阶段），2008-2018年

这篇综述文章介绍了一项探索性研究的结果，以阐明哥伦比亚公共政策研究的现状。该项目的一个核心假设是，在公共政策、理论和实践方面进行相关和彻底研究的国家能力（智力资本）是其民主质量和制度可持续性的关键因素。对2008年至2018年间发表的研究论文进行了系统的文献综述，共涉及1010篇论文。研究结果表明，在哥伦比亚境内继续开展这类研究具有现实意义，需要让所有利益攸关方参与关于如何提高该国设计、实施和评估健全公共政策的能力的对话。相关文章Asongu，Simplice A.2016。《中非关系：主流思想流派的回顾与和解》，政治与经济研究所；政策44（2）：351–83。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12152.德隆巴德，菲利普。2015年，《哥伦比亚贸易保护的政治经济学》；政策43（6）：855-86。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12140.Seefeldt，Jennapher Lunde。2020.“锂三角的教训：考虑智利、阿根廷和玻利维亚‘锂三角’国家锂产业发展变化的政策解释”；政策48（4）：727-65。https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12365.

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Politics & Policy POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

23.10%

发文量