Global eco-innovation and its local impact in emerging economies: Boundary conditions of environmental regulations and pollution intensity

IF 10.1 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Chengang Wang, Yingqi Wei, Lichao Wu
{"title":"Global eco-innovation and its local impact in emerging economies: Boundary conditions of environmental regulations and pollution intensity","authors":"Chengang Wang,&nbsp;Yingqi Wei,&nbsp;Lichao Wu","doi":"10.1111/jpim.12675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>This paper examines the eco-innovation effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) by its economic agents, multinational enterprises (MNEs), in the context of emerging economies. It particularly focuses on environmental regulations and industrial pollution intensity as the key moderating mechanisms. We develop hypotheses by combining economic rationality of natural-resource-based view and institutional rationality of institution-based view. Our theoretical discussions highlight the importance of the intersection between the two theories in explaining the eco-innovation effects of foreign ownership and FDI spillovers, and in particular in allowing a nuanced consideration around the under-explored boundary conditions of FDI effects in the eco-innovation domain. Using the propensity score matching method to match domestically owned enterprises (DOEs) with foreign MNE-invested enterprises (FIEs) in China during the period of 2001–2013, we find clear evidence that FIEs outperform their domestic counterparts of similar characteristics in conducting eco-innovation. This superior performance is particularly pronounced in cities with higher levels of environmental regulation and industries with higher levels of pollution. Furthermore, we assess the local impact of MNEs on eco-innovation of DOEs and find evidence that the presence of FDI, in particular, that within cities, leads to increased eco-innovation in DOEs. FIEs' eco-innovation spillover effects within a city are conditional on environmental regulation and pollution intensity. Thus, in China, MNEs are found to act as agents of change who not only conduct eco-innovation in the host country but also stimulate the eco-innovation of DOEs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16900,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","volume":"40 6","pages":"761-793"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jpim.12675","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpim.12675","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the eco-innovation effects of foreign direct investment (FDI) by its economic agents, multinational enterprises (MNEs), in the context of emerging economies. It particularly focuses on environmental regulations and industrial pollution intensity as the key moderating mechanisms. We develop hypotheses by combining economic rationality of natural-resource-based view and institutional rationality of institution-based view. Our theoretical discussions highlight the importance of the intersection between the two theories in explaining the eco-innovation effects of foreign ownership and FDI spillovers, and in particular in allowing a nuanced consideration around the under-explored boundary conditions of FDI effects in the eco-innovation domain. Using the propensity score matching method to match domestically owned enterprises (DOEs) with foreign MNE-invested enterprises (FIEs) in China during the period of 2001–2013, we find clear evidence that FIEs outperform their domestic counterparts of similar characteristics in conducting eco-innovation. This superior performance is particularly pronounced in cities with higher levels of environmental regulation and industries with higher levels of pollution. Furthermore, we assess the local impact of MNEs on eco-innovation of DOEs and find evidence that the presence of FDI, in particular, that within cities, leads to increased eco-innovation in DOEs. FIEs' eco-innovation spillover effects within a city are conditional on environmental regulation and pollution intensity. Thus, in China, MNEs are found to act as agents of change who not only conduct eco-innovation in the host country but also stimulate the eco-innovation of DOEs.

Abstract Image

全球生态创新及其对新兴经济体的地方影响:环境法规和污染强度的边界条件
本文考察了新兴经济体背景下外国直接投资的经济主体跨国企业的生态创新效应。它特别关注环境法规和工业污染强度作为关键的调节机制。我们将基于自然资源的观点的经济合理性和基于制度的观点的制度合理性相结合,提出了假设。我们的理论讨论强调了这两种理论之间的交叉在解释外国所有权和外国直接投资溢出的生态创新效应方面的重要性,特别是在允许对生态创新领域中未充分探索的外国直接投资效应的边界条件进行细致入微的考虑方面。使用倾向得分匹配方法对2001-2003年期间在中国的内资企业(DOE)和外商跨国公司投资企业(FIE)进行匹配,我们发现明确的证据表明,外商投资企业在进行生态创新方面优于具有类似特征的国内同行。这种优越的表现在环境监管水平较高的城市和污染水平较高的行业尤为明显。此外,我们评估了跨国公司对指定经营实体生态创新的地方影响,并发现有证据表明,外国直接投资的存在,特别是城市内的外国直接投资,导致指定经营实体的生态创新增加。外商投资企业在城市内的生态创新溢出效应取决于环境监管和污染强度。因此,在中国,跨国公司被发现是变革的推动者,他们不仅在东道国进行生态创新,而且刺激了指定经营实体的生态创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Journal of Product Innovation Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Product Innovation Management is a leading academic journal focused on research, theory, and practice in innovation and new product development. It covers a broad scope of issues crucial to successful innovation in both external and internal organizational environments. The journal aims to inform, provoke thought, and contribute to the knowledge and practice of new product development and innovation management. It welcomes original articles from organizations of all sizes and domains, including start-ups, small to medium-sized enterprises, and large corporations, as well as from consumer, business-to-business, and policy domains. The journal accepts various quantitative and qualitative methodologies, and authors from diverse disciplines and functional perspectives are encouraged to submit their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信