A comprehensive test of colour-difference formulae and uniform colour spaces using available visual datasets

IF 1.2 3区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Ming Ronnier Luo, Qiang Xu, Michael Pointer, Manuel Melgosa, Guihua Cui, Changjun Li, Kaida Xiao, Min Huang
{"title":"A comprehensive test of colour-difference formulae and uniform colour spaces using available visual datasets","authors":"Ming Ronnier Luo,&nbsp;Qiang Xu,&nbsp;Michael Pointer,&nbsp;Manuel Melgosa,&nbsp;Guihua Cui,&nbsp;Changjun Li,&nbsp;Kaida Xiao,&nbsp;Min Huang","doi":"10.1002/col.22844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper describes a comprehensive test to evaluate the performance of current colour-difference models using available experimental datasets. In total, 28 individual datasets were accumulated to test 17 colour-difference formulae, 13 of them based on Uniform Colour Spaces (UCSs) in terms of the Standardized Residual Sum of Squares (<i>STRESS</i>) measure. The 28 datasets were divided into three groups: Large Colour-Difference data (LCD), Small Colour-Difference data for surface colours (SCDs), and Small Colour Difference data for display colours (SCDd). For each colour model, four versions were tested: the original model, and that including <i>k</i><sub>L</sub><i>-</i>, Gamma- and <i>k</i><sub>L</sub>/Gamma, which are the lightness parametric factor, the colour-difference exponent factor, and the combination of both, respectively, optimized to fit particular dataset(s). The statistical <i>F</i>-test was applied to test the difference between each pair of models. Furthermore, parametric effects between the large/small colour-difference magnitudes, and between surface/display colours were investigated. The results showed that CAM16-UCS significantly outperformed the other models for all groups. It accurately predicted all types of data and should be proposed for colour-difference evaluation across all industries.</p>","PeriodicalId":10459,"journal":{"name":"Color Research and Application","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/col.22844","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Color Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/col.22844","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The paper describes a comprehensive test to evaluate the performance of current colour-difference models using available experimental datasets. In total, 28 individual datasets were accumulated to test 17 colour-difference formulae, 13 of them based on Uniform Colour Spaces (UCSs) in terms of the Standardized Residual Sum of Squares (STRESS) measure. The 28 datasets were divided into three groups: Large Colour-Difference data (LCD), Small Colour-Difference data for surface colours (SCDs), and Small Colour Difference data for display colours (SCDd). For each colour model, four versions were tested: the original model, and that including kL-, Gamma- and kL/Gamma, which are the lightness parametric factor, the colour-difference exponent factor, and the combination of both, respectively, optimized to fit particular dataset(s). The statistical F-test was applied to test the difference between each pair of models. Furthermore, parametric effects between the large/small colour-difference magnitudes, and between surface/display colours were investigated. The results showed that CAM16-UCS significantly outperformed the other models for all groups. It accurately predicted all types of data and should be proposed for colour-difference evaluation across all industries.

Abstract Image

使用可用的视觉数据集对色差公式和均匀颜色空间进行综合测试
本文描述了一种使用现有实验数据集评估当前色差模型性能的综合测试。总共累积了28个单独的数据集来测试17个色差公式,其中13个基于统一颜色空间(UCS)的标准化残差平方和(STRESS)度量。28个数据集被分为三组:大色差数据(LCD)、表面颜色的小色差数据(SCD)和显示颜色的小温差数据(SCDd)。对于每个颜色模型,测试了四个版本:原始模型,以及包括kL-、Gamma-和kL/Gamma的模型,它们分别是亮度参数因子、色差指数因子和两者的组合,经过优化以适应特定的数据集。应用统计学的F检验来检验每对模型之间的差异。此外,还研究了大/小色差幅度之间以及表面/显示器颜色之间的参数效应。结果表明,CAM16-UCS在所有组中均显著优于其他模型。它准确地预测了所有类型的数据,应该用于所有行业的色差评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Color Research and Application
Color Research and Application 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Color Research and Application provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed research reviews, original research articles, and editorials of the highest quality on the science, technology, and application of color in multiple disciplines. Due to the highly interdisciplinary influence of color, the readership of the journal is similarly widespread and includes those in business, art, design, education, as well as various industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信