Climate Change and Biodiversity Synergies: A Scientometric Analysis in the Context of UNFCCC and CBD

Himangana Gupta, Neeraj Kumar Singh
{"title":"Climate Change and Biodiversity Synergies: A Scientometric Analysis in the Context of UNFCCC and CBD","authors":"Himangana Gupta,&nbsp;Neeraj Kumar Singh","doi":"10.1007/s44177-023-00046-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two major multilateral environmental agreements–the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)–were negotiated in 1992 to tackle the global crises of climate change and biodiversity loss. However, the interlinkages between these two concerns were less recognized and structured which impaired the development of streamlined policies to tackle both simultaneously. Over the last nearly 20 years, increased scientific output on their interlinkages seems to have galvanized the world towards synergistic approaches aimed at transformation instead of business-as-usual effort. The Paris Climate Agreement to the UNFCCC characterizes this synergy by recognizing the importance of conservation and biodiversity protection and ensuring the integrity of all ecosystems. To understand to what extent, scientific output helped reach such synergistic decisions, we studied the temporal distribution of publications on the interlinkages between climate and biodiversity, vis-à-vis important decisions and approaches recognized by the UNFCCC and CBD. The research is based on scientometric meta-analysis of publications, assessing the trends, geographic distribution, key authors, journals, and funding organizations from 1992 to 2021. This information is simultaneously mapped for its significance for major decisions of the two conventions. The later part of the paper sheds light on the science-policy interface by taking cues from outputs of this research and recent workshops and meetings on climate- and biodiversity-related topics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100099,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"5 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44177-023-00046-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Two major multilateral environmental agreements–the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)–were negotiated in 1992 to tackle the global crises of climate change and biodiversity loss. However, the interlinkages between these two concerns were less recognized and structured which impaired the development of streamlined policies to tackle both simultaneously. Over the last nearly 20 years, increased scientific output on their interlinkages seems to have galvanized the world towards synergistic approaches aimed at transformation instead of business-as-usual effort. The Paris Climate Agreement to the UNFCCC characterizes this synergy by recognizing the importance of conservation and biodiversity protection and ensuring the integrity of all ecosystems. To understand to what extent, scientific output helped reach such synergistic decisions, we studied the temporal distribution of publications on the interlinkages between climate and biodiversity, vis-à-vis important decisions and approaches recognized by the UNFCCC and CBD. The research is based on scientometric meta-analysis of publications, assessing the trends, geographic distribution, key authors, journals, and funding organizations from 1992 to 2021. This information is simultaneously mapped for its significance for major decisions of the two conventions. The later part of the paper sheds light on the science-policy interface by taking cues from outputs of this research and recent workshops and meetings on climate- and biodiversity-related topics.

气候变化与生物多样性协同效应:《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《生物多样性公约》背景下的科学计量分析
1992年谈判达成了两项主要的多边环境协定——《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)和《生物多样性公约》(CBD),以应对气候变化和生物多样性丧失的全球危机。然而,这两个关切之间的相互联系没有得到足够的认识和结构,这妨碍了制定同时解决这两个问题的精简政策。在过去的近20年里,关于它们之间相互联系的科学产出的增加似乎促使世界采取旨在转型的协同方法,而不是一切照旧的努力。《联合国气候变化框架公约》的《巴黎气候协定》确认了养护和生物多样性保护的重要性,并确保了所有生态系统的完整性,从而体现了这种协同作用。为了了解科学产出在多大程度上有助于达成这种协同决策,我们研究了关于气候与生物多样性之间相互联系的出版物的时间分布,以及《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《生物多样性公约》认可的重要决策和方法。这项研究基于对出版物的科学计量元分析,评估了1992年至2021年的趋势、地理分布、主要作者、期刊和资助组织。这一信息对两个公约的重大决策具有重要意义,因此同时进行了映射。论文的后半部分通过从这项研究的成果以及最近关于气候和生物多样性相关主题的研讨会和会议中获得线索,揭示了科学与政策的互动关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信