The deployable tectonic: mechanization and mobility in architecture

Christina McCoy, Thomas A. Duffy
{"title":"The deployable tectonic: mechanization and mobility in architecture","authors":"Christina McCoy,&nbsp;Thomas A. Duffy","doi":"10.1007/s44150-022-00045-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>Movable elements in architecture are not new, but are gaining in popularity, as evidenced in recent works of architecture such as The Shed at Hudson Yards. This type of architecture, termed “kinetic” shifts the relationship of the public to the space they inhabit. People are no longer moving bodies through the space; the space transforms around them. Further, the design process for success in these types of projects is highly layered and complex. If structural advances drive this trend, we are at a unique juncture in the history of architecture, similar to the flying buttress or standardized fabrication wherein technology is leading architectural aesthetics. From the user’s perspective, a piece of architecture becomes active; it awakens from the static. These elements bring the architectural design to the forefront of a visitor’s attention. Often the technology of mechanized architecture can be simplified into simple diagrams. Indeed there has been in recent years a small flurry around these moves, studied in small models and diagrammatic vignettes. However, in implementation, these structures are quite sophisticated. Their engineering requires a keen understanding of how forces trace through a structure in multiple scenarios of deployment. Looking at the case study of The Shed at Hudson Yards, of which the authors have first-hand project experience, it can be seen that kinetic projects possess what is posited to be called “hyper-collaboration,” as every decision has impacts upon as well as is informed by the allied disciplines within a design and construction team. Thus, a linear model wherein an architectural solution is envisioned then subsequently handed off to be implemented dissolves, and a new, more networked approach emerges.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":100117,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","volume":"2 4","pages":"613 - 628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Structures and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44150-022-00045-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract

Movable elements in architecture are not new, but are gaining in popularity, as evidenced in recent works of architecture such as The Shed at Hudson Yards. This type of architecture, termed “kinetic” shifts the relationship of the public to the space they inhabit. People are no longer moving bodies through the space; the space transforms around them. Further, the design process for success in these types of projects is highly layered and complex. If structural advances drive this trend, we are at a unique juncture in the history of architecture, similar to the flying buttress or standardized fabrication wherein technology is leading architectural aesthetics. From the user’s perspective, a piece of architecture becomes active; it awakens from the static. These elements bring the architectural design to the forefront of a visitor’s attention. Often the technology of mechanized architecture can be simplified into simple diagrams. Indeed there has been in recent years a small flurry around these moves, studied in small models and diagrammatic vignettes. However, in implementation, these structures are quite sophisticated. Their engineering requires a keen understanding of how forces trace through a structure in multiple scenarios of deployment. Looking at the case study of The Shed at Hudson Yards, of which the authors have first-hand project experience, it can be seen that kinetic projects possess what is posited to be called “hyper-collaboration,” as every decision has impacts upon as well as is informed by the allied disciplines within a design and construction team. Thus, a linear model wherein an architectural solution is envisioned then subsequently handed off to be implemented dissolves, and a new, more networked approach emerges.

可展开构造:建筑的机械化和机动性
抽象建筑中的可移动元素并不新鲜,但越来越受欢迎,最近的建筑作品如哈德逊庭院的棚屋就证明了这一点。这种被称为“动态”的建筑将公众与他们居住的空间的关系转变。人们不再在空间中移动身体;他们周围的空间发生了变化。此外,在这些类型的项目中取得成功的设计过程是高度分层和复杂的。如果结构的进步推动了这一趋势,那么我们正处于建筑史上一个独特的转折点,类似于技术引领建筑美学的飞行扶壁或标准化制造。从用户的角度来看,一个架构变得活跃起来;它从静止中醒来。这些元素使建筑设计成为游客关注的焦点。机械化建筑技术通常可以简化为简单的图表。事实上,近年来围绕这些举措出现了一场小风波,以小模型和图解的方式进行了研究。然而,在实施过程中,这些结构相当复杂。他们的工程需要敏锐地了解部队如何在多个部署场景中追踪结构。看看作者拥有第一手项目经验的哈德逊庭院棚屋的案例研究,可以看出,动态项目具有所谓的“超协作”,因为每一个决策都会影响设计和施工团队中的相关学科,并由其提供信息。因此,一个线性模型(其中设想了一个体系结构解决方案,然后将其移交给实施方案)消失了,一种新的、更网络化的方法出现了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信