Assessing the Realization of Global Land Restoration: A Meta-analysis

Sheikh Adil Edrisi, Priyanka Sarkar, Jaewon Son, Nagaraja Tejo Prakash, Himlal Baral
{"title":"Assessing the Realization of Global Land Restoration: A Meta-analysis","authors":"Sheikh Adil Edrisi,&nbsp;Priyanka Sarkar,&nbsp;Jaewon Son,&nbsp;Nagaraja Tejo Prakash,&nbsp;Himlal Baral","doi":"10.1007/s44177-022-00018-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Restoring degraded land is essential for regaining ecosystem services (ES) and attaining the UN-Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Unfortunately, 24% of the global lands are degraded, significantly affecting the lives of 3.2 billion people worldwide. Therefore, innovative restoration practices are vital during ‘UN-Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.’ A meta-analysis of 2093 documents on land degradation and restoration was conducted in this context, and 117 empirical studies were analyzed in detail. These studies were based on the different drivers of land degradation as per the criteria of IPBES and IPCC, respectively. Results suggested that woodland encroachment (18.25%), cropland expansion (18.11%), species loss/compositional shifts (16.06%), climatic factors (14.96%), infrastructure development/urbanization (14.17%), water erosion (13.87%), wind erosion (9.49%) and other demographic pressures (8.66%) were the significant drivers of land degradation. Interestingly, there was a continent-wide change in the critical drivers of land degradation and depleting ES. The infrastructure development/urbanization, demography, and economic attributes were the essential drivers in Asia–Pacific and African regions. In contrast, the fire-regime shift and invasiveness were the significant drivers in Europe, and the climatic attribute was the crucial driver in the Americas. Out of the 117 studies selected worldwide, some ongoing restoration efforts had little emphasis on research-driven on-site restoration for improving different ES. Furthermore, some restoration projects lack proper stakeholder involvement thereby, fail to attract large-scale public acceptance. Moreover, only 12.8% of the studies focused on improving the ES in highly degraded lands. Therefore, this meta-analysis suggests that site-specific, research-driven, and on-site restoration strategies coupled with proper stakeholder engagement are imperative for regaining the ES and functions of the degraded landscape to attain UN-SDG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100099,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"179 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44177-022-00018-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Restoring degraded land is essential for regaining ecosystem services (ES) and attaining the UN-Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Unfortunately, 24% of the global lands are degraded, significantly affecting the lives of 3.2 billion people worldwide. Therefore, innovative restoration practices are vital during ‘UN-Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.’ A meta-analysis of 2093 documents on land degradation and restoration was conducted in this context, and 117 empirical studies were analyzed in detail. These studies were based on the different drivers of land degradation as per the criteria of IPBES and IPCC, respectively. Results suggested that woodland encroachment (18.25%), cropland expansion (18.11%), species loss/compositional shifts (16.06%), climatic factors (14.96%), infrastructure development/urbanization (14.17%), water erosion (13.87%), wind erosion (9.49%) and other demographic pressures (8.66%) were the significant drivers of land degradation. Interestingly, there was a continent-wide change in the critical drivers of land degradation and depleting ES. The infrastructure development/urbanization, demography, and economic attributes were the essential drivers in Asia–Pacific and African regions. In contrast, the fire-regime shift and invasiveness were the significant drivers in Europe, and the climatic attribute was the crucial driver in the Americas. Out of the 117 studies selected worldwide, some ongoing restoration efforts had little emphasis on research-driven on-site restoration for improving different ES. Furthermore, some restoration projects lack proper stakeholder involvement thereby, fail to attract large-scale public acceptance. Moreover, only 12.8% of the studies focused on improving the ES in highly degraded lands. Therefore, this meta-analysis suggests that site-specific, research-driven, and on-site restoration strategies coupled with proper stakeholder engagement are imperative for regaining the ES and functions of the degraded landscape to attain UN-SDG.

评估全球土地恢复的实现:一个元分析
恢复退化土地对于恢复生态系统服务和到2030年实现联合国可持续发展目标至关重要。不幸的是,全球24%的土地退化,严重影响了全球32亿人的生活。因此,在“联合国生态系统恢复十年”期间,创新的恢复实践至关重要在此背景下,对2093份关于土地退化和恢复的文件进行了荟萃分析,并对117项实证研究进行了详细分析。这些研究分别根据IPBES和IPCC的标准,基于土地退化的不同驱动因素。结果表明,林地侵占(18.25%)、耕地扩张(18.11%)、物种损失/组成变化(16.06%)、气候因素(14.96%)、基础设施发展/城市化(14.17%)、水土流失(13.87%)、风蚀(9.49%)和其他人口压力(8.66%)是土地退化的重要驱动因素。有趣的是,整个大陆的土地退化和ES消耗的关键驱动因素发生了变化。基础设施发展/城市化、人口统计和经济特征是亚太和非洲地区的主要驱动因素。相比之下,火灾制度的转变和入侵是欧洲的重要驱动因素,而气候特征是美洲的关键驱动因素。在全球选定的117项研究中,一些正在进行的修复工作很少强调研究驱动的现场修复,以改善不同的ES。此外,一些修复项目缺乏适当的利益相关者参与,因此未能吸引大规模的公众接受。此外,只有12.8%的研究侧重于改善高度退化土地的ES。因此,该荟萃分析表明,特定地点、研究驱动和现场恢复战略,加上适当的利益相关者参与,对于恢复退化景观的生态系统和功能,以实现联合国可持续发展目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信