State of the Art of Aviation Safety Reporting in Europe

Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio Pub Date : 2023-03-20 DOI:10.1007/s42496-023-00150-z

Lucas Fernandes da Costa Pappacena, Beatrice Conti, Giuliano Antoniciello, Giorgio Guglieri

{"title":"State of the Art of Aviation Safety Reporting in Europe","authors":"Lucas Fernandes da Costa Pappacena, Beatrice Conti, Giuliano Antoniciello, Giorgio Guglieri","doi":"10.1007/s42496-023-00150-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Since the introduction of Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council in 2014, [1], EU Member States and EASA have been required to publish the Annual Safety Review (ASR). The ASR contains an overview of the safety statistics in each Member State, reporting numerical indicators and graphical representations. Its goal is to describe national aviation safety scenarios on which appropriate preventive measures can be based. Among the diversity of reporting practices within the EU Member States, it is possible to find a common set of criteria for the analysis of ASRs, to design homogeneous and data-driven safety measures across the continent. Currently, the main obstacles to our approach arise from the wide variety of reporting styles and the lack of shared guidelines for ASRs. This paper proposes a template to assist EU Member States in the process of producing their ASRs and presents a comparative analysis of a selected subset of these documents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100054,"journal":{"name":"Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio","volume":"102 2","pages":"149 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42496-023-00150-z.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42496-023-00150-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the introduction of Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council in 2014, [1], EU Member States and EASA have been required to publish the Annual Safety Review (ASR). The ASR contains an overview of the safety statistics in each Member State, reporting numerical indicators and graphical representations. Its goal is to describe national aviation safety scenarios on which appropriate preventive measures can be based. Among the diversity of reporting practices within the EU Member States, it is possible to find a common set of criteria for the analysis of ASRs, to design homogeneous and data-driven safety measures across the continent. Currently, the main obstacles to our approach arise from the wide variety of reporting styles and the lack of shared guidelines for ASRs. This paper proposes a template to assist EU Member States in the process of producing their ASRs and presents a comparative analysis of a selected subset of these documents.

查看原文本刊更多论文

欧洲航空安全报告技术现状

自2014年欧洲议会和欧盟理事会第376/2014号法规（欧盟）出台以来，[1]，欧盟成员国和欧洲广告标准局被要求公布年度安全审查（ASR）。ASR概述了每个成员国的安全统计数据，报告了数字指标和图形表示。其目标是描述可作为适当预防措施基础的国家航空安全情景。在欧盟成员国报告做法的多样性中，可以找到一套通用的ASR分析标准，在整个欧洲大陆设计同质和数据驱动的安全措施。目前，我们方法的主要障碍来自于报告风格的多样性和缺乏ASR的共同指导方针。本文提出了一个模板，以协助欧盟成员国编制其ASR，并对这些文件的选定子集进行了比较分析。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Aerotecnica Missili & Spazio

自引率

0.00%

发文量