Comparative Assessment of Tree Carbon Sequestration Potential and Soil Carbon Dynamics of Major Plantation Crops and Homestead Agroforestry of Kerala, India

Usha Mina, Greeshma Geetha, Rashmita Sharma, Deepti Singh
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Tree Carbon Sequestration Potential and Soil Carbon Dynamics of Major Plantation Crops and Homestead Agroforestry of Kerala, India","authors":"Usha Mina,&nbsp;Greeshma Geetha,&nbsp;Rashmita Sharma,&nbsp;Deepti Singh","doi":"10.1007/s44177-023-00052-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Designing sustainable food and agricultural systems is a pressing need at a time when we already are at the low end of achieving SDG 13 (Climate Action) of reducing carbon emissions. In such a scenario, this study has the potential to provide an insightful framework for policymakers. The major objective of this study is to estimate the carbon sequestration of tree crops, and soil analysis in homestead agroforestry systems (AFS), monocropped rubber plantations, and monocropped coconut plantations in the Alappuzha and Kollam districts of Kerala. The soil carbon parameters analyzed were soil organic carbon (SOC) and labile carbon. Other parameters, such as pH and electrical conductivity of soil, were also measured. The soil of rubber plantations had the least pH (4.8) and EC (79 µS/cm). We found the tree carbon sequestration of rubber trees in the plantations to be the highest (13.8 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> year <sup>−1</sup>) followed by homestead AFS (2.68 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>) and coconut tree plantation (2.08 ± 0.53 t C ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>). The tree carbon sequestration potential was significantly (<i>p = </i>0.003) influenced by the treatments. In soil, the SOC content was highest in the homestead AFS (2.48%). The labile carbon was also found to be higher in the homestead AFS (0.06%) but was least in rubber plantation (0.04%). These results indicate that even though the tree carbon sequestration of homestead AFS is lesser compared to that of large tree plantations such as rubber. The soil carbon pools and other physical and chemical properties of soil promote the valuable contribution that homestead can play in the sustainability of the environment and ensuring food security.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100099,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"93 - 100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44177-023-00052-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Designing sustainable food and agricultural systems is a pressing need at a time when we already are at the low end of achieving SDG 13 (Climate Action) of reducing carbon emissions. In such a scenario, this study has the potential to provide an insightful framework for policymakers. The major objective of this study is to estimate the carbon sequestration of tree crops, and soil analysis in homestead agroforestry systems (AFS), monocropped rubber plantations, and monocropped coconut plantations in the Alappuzha and Kollam districts of Kerala. The soil carbon parameters analyzed were soil organic carbon (SOC) and labile carbon. Other parameters, such as pH and electrical conductivity of soil, were also measured. The soil of rubber plantations had the least pH (4.8) and EC (79 µS/cm). We found the tree carbon sequestration of rubber trees in the plantations to be the highest (13.8 t C ha−1 year −1) followed by homestead AFS (2.68 t C ha−1 yr−1) and coconut tree plantation (2.08 ± 0.53 t C ha−1 year−1). The tree carbon sequestration potential was significantly (p = 0.003) influenced by the treatments. In soil, the SOC content was highest in the homestead AFS (2.48%). The labile carbon was also found to be higher in the homestead AFS (0.06%) but was least in rubber plantation (0.04%). These results indicate that even though the tree carbon sequestration of homestead AFS is lesser compared to that of large tree plantations such as rubber. The soil carbon pools and other physical and chemical properties of soil promote the valuable contribution that homestead can play in the sustainability of the environment and ensuring food security.

印度喀拉拉邦主要人工林与农林业树木固碳潜力及土壤碳动态比较
在实现减少碳排放的可持续发展目标13(气候行动)的目标已经处于低端之际,设计可持续粮食和农业系统是一项迫切需要。在这种情况下,这项研究有可能为政策制定者提供一个有见地的框架。本研究的主要目的是评估喀拉拉邦Alappuzha和Kollam地区的农林复合系统(AFS)、单作橡胶园和单作椰子园中树木作物的碳固存,并进行土壤分析。分析的土壤碳参数为土壤有机碳(SOC)和土壤活性碳。其他参数,如pH值和土壤电导率,也被测量。橡胶林土壤pH值最低(4.8),EC值最低(79µS/cm)。橡胶树的固碳量最高(13.8 t C ha−1年−1年−1),其次是宅基地AFS (2.68 t C ha−1年−1年−1)和椰子树人工林(2.08±0.53 t C ha−1年−1)。不同处理对林木固碳潜力有显著影响(p = 0.003)。土壤中,宅基地AFS土壤有机碳含量最高(2.48%)。农庄AFS的活性碳含量较高(0.06%),而橡胶林的活性碳含量最低(0.04%)。这些结果表明,尽管与橡胶等大型人工林相比,宅基地AFS的树木固碳量较小。土壤碳库和土壤的其他物理和化学性质促进了宅基地在环境可持续性和确保粮食安全方面可以发挥的宝贵贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信