Gas Flaring in Nigeria: A Multi-level Governance and Policy Coherence Analysis

Godwin O. Aigbe, Lindsay C. Stringer, Matthew Cotton
{"title":"Gas Flaring in Nigeria: A Multi-level Governance and Policy Coherence Analysis","authors":"Godwin O. Aigbe,&nbsp;Lindsay C. Stringer,&nbsp;Matthew Cotton","doi":"10.1007/s44177-023-00045-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The unnecessary flaring of natural gas impacts public and environmental health, contributes to climate change and wastes fuel resources. Though reducing flaring is an emergent global environmental governance priority, progress has been slow. We assess gas flaring policy in the critical case of Nigeria through multi-level governance (MLG) structure. Our analysis assesses policy coherence (leading to progress in reaching shared goals) and divergence (creating tension and undermining progress) amongst sectors and institutional structures across the supranational, federal, state and local government scales. A combined dataset of documents, stakeholder interviews and expert surveys is analysed using Qualitative Document Analysis (QDA) and content analysis. We identify the principal actors involved, examine the extent of gas flaring awareness and policy coherence across multiple sectors/policy domains, and assess progress towards Nigeria’s national intended contribution and national policy on climate change mitigation. We find that policy coherence around gas flaring, including efforts towards climate change mitigation, has been slowed by political partisanship, poor governance, lack of regulatory compliance, and policy conflict between environmental protection and economic development priorities. Nigeria urgently requires inclusive involvement of stakeholder voices across multiple sectors and scales of local/regional government, the strengthening of federal institutions, a revaluation of economic aspirations through revenue diversification, and leadership that can temper the power of International Oil Companies (IOCs) to exploit the complexity of the MLG structure. These actions would help the government in improving environmental justice outcomes for flaring-affected communities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100099,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Science","volume":"2 1","pages":"31 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44177-023-00045-5.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44177-023-00045-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The unnecessary flaring of natural gas impacts public and environmental health, contributes to climate change and wastes fuel resources. Though reducing flaring is an emergent global environmental governance priority, progress has been slow. We assess gas flaring policy in the critical case of Nigeria through multi-level governance (MLG) structure. Our analysis assesses policy coherence (leading to progress in reaching shared goals) and divergence (creating tension and undermining progress) amongst sectors and institutional structures across the supranational, federal, state and local government scales. A combined dataset of documents, stakeholder interviews and expert surveys is analysed using Qualitative Document Analysis (QDA) and content analysis. We identify the principal actors involved, examine the extent of gas flaring awareness and policy coherence across multiple sectors/policy domains, and assess progress towards Nigeria’s national intended contribution and national policy on climate change mitigation. We find that policy coherence around gas flaring, including efforts towards climate change mitigation, has been slowed by political partisanship, poor governance, lack of regulatory compliance, and policy conflict between environmental protection and economic development priorities. Nigeria urgently requires inclusive involvement of stakeholder voices across multiple sectors and scales of local/regional government, the strengthening of federal institutions, a revaluation of economic aspirations through revenue diversification, and leadership that can temper the power of International Oil Companies (IOCs) to exploit the complexity of the MLG structure. These actions would help the government in improving environmental justice outcomes for flaring-affected communities.

尼日利亚天然气燃除:多层次治理和政策一致性分析
不必要的天然气燃烧影响公众和环境健康,加剧气候变化,浪费燃料资源。尽管减少燃烧是全球环境治理的当务之急,但进展缓慢。我们通过多层次治理(MLG)结构评估尼日利亚关键情况下的天然气燃烧政策。我们的分析评估了超国家、联邦、州和地方政府层面的部门和体制结构之间的政策一致性(导致在实现共同目标方面取得进展)和分歧(造成紧张局势并破坏进展)。使用定性文件分析(QDA)和内容分析对文件、利益相关者访谈和专家调查的组合数据集进行分析。我们确定了参与的主要行为者,审查了多个部门/政策领域对天然气燃烧的认识和政策一致性的程度,并评估了尼日利亚在实现国家预期贡献和减缓气候变化国家政策方面的进展。我们发现,由于政治党派之争、治理不善、缺乏监管合规性以及环境保护和经济发展优先事项之间的政策冲突,围绕天然气燃烧的政策一致性,包括减缓气候变化的努力,已经放缓。尼日利亚迫切需要地方/地区政府多个部门和规模的利益相关者的包容性参与,加强联邦机构,通过收入多元化重新评估经济愿望,以及能够削弱国际石油公司利用MLG结构复杂性的权力的领导力。这些行动将有助于政府改善受燃烧影响社区的环境正义结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信