The European Parliament’s shifting perspectives on climate justice with regard to China and India

IF 1.6 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Sanja Petrović, Franziska Petri, Katja Biedenkopf
{"title":"The European Parliament’s shifting perspectives on climate justice with regard to China and India","authors":"Sanja Petrović,&nbsp;Franziska Petri,&nbsp;Katja Biedenkopf","doi":"10.1007/s10308-022-00647-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>Justice and responsibility are central notions shaping the international climate negotiations. However, countries have different perspectives on how to translate these concepts into solutions for climate change. In this process, actors such as the European Union (EU) play a central role, by trying to persuade other large greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters to take on their (historical) responsibilities and by supporting developing countries. At the same time, China and India have become central actors in international climate negotiations. Due to their rapid economic growth and rising GHG emissions, their climate action is crucial for achieving global goals, while their historical emissions are very different from those of Western countries. To shed light on the EU’s perspective on climate justice, and the particular role of China and India therein, this article analyses Members of European Parliament’s (MEPs) narratives in plenary debates on foreign climate policy between 1996 and 2019. MEPs’ views contribute to shaping the EU’s position on the topic, but also provide useful insights into the political dynamics of the debate. The paper finds that climate justice is mentioned in less than half of the MEPs’ speeches, but that its salience increased over time and became more diverse in terms of different dimensions of climate justice. We also uncover that MEPs’ positions on China and India evolved with the rise in their emissions, becoming increasingly critical over time. However, there is a significant variance amongst political groups’ positions, between those on the right and the left end of the political spectrum.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":45680,"journal":{"name":"Asia Europe Journal","volume":"20 4","pages":"423 - 439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10308-022-00647-5.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Europe Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10308-022-00647-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract

Justice and responsibility are central notions shaping the international climate negotiations. However, countries have different perspectives on how to translate these concepts into solutions for climate change. In this process, actors such as the European Union (EU) play a central role, by trying to persuade other large greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters to take on their (historical) responsibilities and by supporting developing countries. At the same time, China and India have become central actors in international climate negotiations. Due to their rapid economic growth and rising GHG emissions, their climate action is crucial for achieving global goals, while their historical emissions are very different from those of Western countries. To shed light on the EU’s perspective on climate justice, and the particular role of China and India therein, this article analyses Members of European Parliament’s (MEPs) narratives in plenary debates on foreign climate policy between 1996 and 2019. MEPs’ views contribute to shaping the EU’s position on the topic, but also provide useful insights into the political dynamics of the debate. The paper finds that climate justice is mentioned in less than half of the MEPs’ speeches, but that its salience increased over time and became more diverse in terms of different dimensions of climate justice. We also uncover that MEPs’ positions on China and India evolved with the rise in their emissions, becoming increasingly critical over time. However, there is a significant variance amongst political groups’ positions, between those on the right and the left end of the political spectrum.

Abstract Image

欧洲议会对中国和印度气候正义观点的转变
摘要正义与责任是影响国际气候谈判的核心理念。然而,各国对如何将这些概念转化为气候变化的解决方案有不同的看法。在这一过程中,欧盟(EU)等行为体发挥着核心作用,努力说服其他温室气体排放大国承担其(历史)责任,并支持发展中国家。与此同时,中国和印度已成为国际气候谈判的核心角色。由于经济的快速增长和温室气体排放的增加,它们的气候行动对实现全球目标至关重要,而它们的历史排放量与西方国家有很大不同。为了阐明欧盟对气候正义的看法,以及中国和印度在其中的特殊作用,本文分析了1996年至2019年欧洲议会议员在对外气候政策全体辩论中的陈述。欧洲议会议员的观点有助于塑造欧盟在这个话题上的立场,但也为辩论的政治动态提供了有用的见解。论文发现,气候正义在不到一半的欧洲议会议员的演讲中被提及,但随着时间的推移,气候正义的重要性越来越高,在气候正义的不同维度上变得更加多样化。我们还发现,欧洲议会议员对中国和印度的立场随着排放量的增加而演变,随着时间的推移变得越来越重要。然而,政治团体之间的立场存在显著差异,在政治光谱的右翼和左翼之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Europe Journal
Asia Europe Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: The Asia-Europe Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated to publishing quality academic papers and policy discussions on common challenges facing Asia and Europe that help to shape narratives on the common futures - including both risks and opportunities - of Asia and Europe. The Journal welcomes academically and intellectually rigorous research papers as well as topical policy briefs and thought pieces on issues of bi-regional interest, including management and political economy, innovation, security studies, regional and global governance, as well as on relevant socio-cultural developments and historical events. Officially cited as: Asia Eur J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信