Combining Rainwater Harvesting and Grass Reseeding to Revegetate Denuded African Semi-arid Landscapes

Kevin Z. Mganga, Luwieke Bosma, Kevin O. Amollo, Theophilus Kioko, Nancy Kadenyi, Aphaxard J. N. Ndathi, Stephen M. Wambua, Eric M. Kaindi, Gilbert K. Musyoki, Nashon K. R. Musimba, Frank van Steenbergen
{"title":"Combining Rainwater Harvesting and Grass Reseeding to Revegetate Denuded African Semi-arid Landscapes","authors":"Kevin Z. Mganga,&nbsp;Luwieke Bosma,&nbsp;Kevin O. Amollo,&nbsp;Theophilus Kioko,&nbsp;Nancy Kadenyi,&nbsp;Aphaxard J. N. Ndathi,&nbsp;Stephen M. Wambua,&nbsp;Eric M. Kaindi,&nbsp;Gilbert K. Musyoki,&nbsp;Nashon K. R. Musimba,&nbsp;Frank van Steenbergen","doi":"10.1007/s44177-021-00007-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In African drylands, perennial grasses preferred by grazing livestock are disappearing at an alarming rate. This has led to recurrent livestock feed shortages threatening pastoralist’s livelihoods. Combining native grass reseeding and rainwater harvesting offers a viable and innovative solution to reverse this trend. However, studies to determine how biomass yields are affected by soil moisture availability attributed to in situ rainwater harvesting in African drylands are limited. We investigated how biomass yields of three grasses native to Africa, i.e., <i>Enteropogon macrostachyus</i> (Bush rye grass), <i>Cenchrus ciliaris</i> (African foxtail grass), and <i>Eragrostis superba</i> (Maasai love grass), are affected by soil moisture content in a typical semi-arid landscape. Rainwater harvesting structures included trenches, micro-catchments and furrows. Additionally, rain runoff was diverted from an adjacent road used as a catchment area. Soil moisture was measured between November 2018 and August 2019 using PlantCare Mini-Logger sensors installed at 40 and 50 cm depths and 0, 1, 5 and 15 m away from the trench. Quadrat method was used to determine biomass yields in August 2019. Peaks in soil moisture were observed after rainfall events. Soil moisture content gradually decreased after the rainy season, but was higher closer to the trench. This is attributed to the prolonged rainwater retention in the trenches. Biomass yields were in the order <i>Eragrostis superba</i> &gt; <i>Cenchrus ciliaris</i> &gt; <i>Enteropogon macrostachyus.</i> Biomass production was higher near the trenches for all the studied species. Sensitivity to soil moisture demonstrated by the magnitude to yield reduction during the growing season was in the order <i>Eragrostis superba</i> &gt; <i>Cenchrus ciliaris</i> &gt; <i>Enteropogon macrostachyus</i>. These results suggest that <i>Eragrostis superba</i> is more sensitive to drought stress than <i>Enteropogon macrostachyus</i> that is adapted to a wide range of soil moisture conditions. We demonstrated that in situ rainwater harvesting structures enhanced soil moisture availability and displayed great potential for revegetating denuded natural rangelands in semi-arid African landscapes. Thus, combining rainwater harvesting and reseeding techniques can produce measurable improvements in pastoral livelihoods and should be incorporated in dryland development policies in the region. Ultimately, incorporating such innovative strategies can strengthen the effectiveness of ecological restoration in African drylands to meet the objectives of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n <div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100099,"journal":{"name":"Anthropocene Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"80 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s44177-021-00007-9.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropocene Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44177-021-00007-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In African drylands, perennial grasses preferred by grazing livestock are disappearing at an alarming rate. This has led to recurrent livestock feed shortages threatening pastoralist’s livelihoods. Combining native grass reseeding and rainwater harvesting offers a viable and innovative solution to reverse this trend. However, studies to determine how biomass yields are affected by soil moisture availability attributed to in situ rainwater harvesting in African drylands are limited. We investigated how biomass yields of three grasses native to Africa, i.e., Enteropogon macrostachyus (Bush rye grass), Cenchrus ciliaris (African foxtail grass), and Eragrostis superba (Maasai love grass), are affected by soil moisture content in a typical semi-arid landscape. Rainwater harvesting structures included trenches, micro-catchments and furrows. Additionally, rain runoff was diverted from an adjacent road used as a catchment area. Soil moisture was measured between November 2018 and August 2019 using PlantCare Mini-Logger sensors installed at 40 and 50 cm depths and 0, 1, 5 and 15 m away from the trench. Quadrat method was used to determine biomass yields in August 2019. Peaks in soil moisture were observed after rainfall events. Soil moisture content gradually decreased after the rainy season, but was higher closer to the trench. This is attributed to the prolonged rainwater retention in the trenches. Biomass yields were in the order Eragrostis superba > Cenchrus ciliaris > Enteropogon macrostachyus. Biomass production was higher near the trenches for all the studied species. Sensitivity to soil moisture demonstrated by the magnitude to yield reduction during the growing season was in the order Eragrostis superba > Cenchrus ciliaris > Enteropogon macrostachyus. These results suggest that Eragrostis superba is more sensitive to drought stress than Enteropogon macrostachyus that is adapted to a wide range of soil moisture conditions. We demonstrated that in situ rainwater harvesting structures enhanced soil moisture availability and displayed great potential for revegetating denuded natural rangelands in semi-arid African landscapes. Thus, combining rainwater harvesting and reseeding techniques can produce measurable improvements in pastoral livelihoods and should be incorporated in dryland development policies in the region. Ultimately, incorporating such innovative strategies can strengthen the effectiveness of ecological restoration in African drylands to meet the objectives of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration and achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Graphical abstract

结合雨水收集和草种修复非洲半干旱景观
在非洲旱地,放牧牲畜喜欢的多年生牧草正在以惊人的速度消失。这导致经常性的牲畜饲料短缺,威胁到牧民的生计。将原生牧草重新播种和雨水收集相结合,为扭转这一趋势提供了可行的创新解决方案。然而,确定非洲旱地就地雨水收集导致的土壤水分有效性如何影响生物量产量的研究是有限的。在典型的半干旱景观条件下,研究了3种非洲原产禾草,即Enteropogon macrostachyus(灌木黑麦草)、Cenchrus ciliaris(非洲狐尾草)和Eragrostis superba(马赛爱草)的生物量产量如何受到土壤含水量的影响。雨水收集结构包括沟渠、微集水区和沟槽。此外,雨水径流从邻近的道路转移,用作集水区。在2018年11月至2019年8月期间,使用安装在40和50厘米深度、距离沟0、1、5和15米处的PlantCare Mini-Logger传感器测量土壤湿度。采用样方法确定2019年8月的生物质产量。降雨后土壤湿度达到峰值。雨季过后,土壤含水量逐渐降低,但靠近海沟的土壤含水量较高。这是由于雨水长期滞留在沟渠中。生物量产量比依次为:大卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶卷叶。所有研究物种的生物量产量都在海沟附近较高。生长季对土壤水分的敏感性依次为:大灰卷木(Eragrostis superba)、毛卷木(Cenchrus ciliaris)、大绒卷木(Enteropogon macrostachyus)。这些结果表明,大叶豆比大叶豆对干旱胁迫更敏感,对土壤水分条件的适应范围更广。我们证明了原位雨水收集结构提高了土壤水分的有效性,并显示了在半干旱的非洲景观中植被恢复的巨大潜力。因此,将雨水收集和补种技术结合起来可以显著改善牧民生计,并应纳入该地区的旱地发展政策。最终,采用这种创新战略可以加强非洲旱地生态恢复的有效性,以实现联合国生态系统恢复十年的目标和实现联合国可持续发展目标。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信